Creating contexts: Writing introductions across genres

Creating Contexts: Writing Introductions across Genres

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-119

  Feak, Christine B ^a   Swales, John M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85168376518     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.3367288     Document Type: Book

References (38)

1. Árvay, A., & Tankó, G. (2004). A contrastive analysis of English and Hungarian theoretical research article introductions. IRAL, 42, 71-100.
2. Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 38-46.
3. Ayers, G. (2008). The evolutionary nature of genre: An investigation of the short texts accompanying research articles in the scientific journal Nature. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 22-41.
4. Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3-24.
5. Bondi M. (2007). Authority and expert voices in the discourse of history. In K. Fløttum, Language and discipline perspectives on academic discourse (pp. 66-88). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
6. Bowen, N. (2003). How to write a research article for the Journal of Genetic Counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(1), 5-21.
7. Charles, M. (2006). Phraseological patterns in resporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 310-331.
8. Charney, D. (1993). A study in rhetorical reading. In J. Selzer, Understanding scientific prose (pp. 203-231). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9. Clark, I. (2005). A Genre Approach to Writing Assignments. Retrieved January 8, 2010, from Composition Forum: http://compositionforum.com/ issue/14.2/clark-genre-writing.php.
10. Clugston, M. (2008). An analysis of citation forms in health science journals. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 2(1), A11-A22.
11. Corbett, J. (2007). Writing for scholarly journals: Publishing in the arts, humanities and social sciences. Glasgow: eSharp.
12. Dahl, T. (2009). How economists present their knowledge claims: The linguistic representation of rhetorical function. Written Communication, 26, 310-391.
13. Duszak, A. (1997). Analyzing digressiveness in Polish academic texts. In A. Duszak, Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 323-341). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
14. Feak, C. B., Reinhart, S. M., & Sinsheimer, A. (2000). A preliminary analysis of law review notes. English for Specific Purposes, 19(3), 197-220.
15. Feak, C. B., & Swales, J. M. (2009). Telling a research story: Writing a literature review. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16. Hartley, J. (2009). Writing an introduction to the introduction. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 39(3), 321-329.
17. Harwood, N. (2010). Research-based materials to demystify citation for postgraduates. In N. Harwood, English language teaching materials: Theory and Practice (pp. 301-321). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 341-367.
19. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
20. Johnson, C., & Green, B. (2009). Submitting manuscripts to biomedical journals: Common errors and helpful solutions. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 32(1), 1-12.
21. Lewin, B. A., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genrebased approach to social science research texts. London: Continuum.
22. Li, L. J., & Ge, G. C. (2009). Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985-2004). English for Specific Purposes, 28(2), 93-104.
23. Lim, J. M. H. (2010). Schematic strategies and supervisor's expectations: A genre-based investigation into directional determinants in American doctoral dissertations on experimental language research. Unpublished manuscript.
24. Motta-Roth, D. (1998). Discourse analysis and academic book reviews: A study of text and disciplinary cultures. In I. Fortanet, Genre studies in English for academic purposes (pp. 29-58). Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume.
25. Neill, V. (2007). How to write a scientific masterpiece. The Journal of Clinical Investigations, 117(12), 35999-33602
26. Paul, D. (2000). Inciting chaos: A study of the rhetorical use of citations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, 185-222.
27. Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
28. Shehzad, W. (2008). Move 2: establishing a niche. Ibérica, 15, 25-49.
29. Skulstad, A. S. (2005). The use of metadiscourse in introductory sections of a new genre. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 71-86.
30. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33. Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78.
34. Thompson, G., & Ye, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365-382.
35. Thompson, P. (2000). Citation practices in PhD theses. In L. Burnard, & T. McEnery, Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
36. Thompson, P., & Tribble, C. (2001). Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 91-105.
37. Tucker, P. (2003). Evaluation in the art-historical research article. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 291-312.
38. Winsor, D. (1993). Owning corporate texts. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, 179-195.