FROM LEARNING HISTORY TODOING HISTORY: Beyond the Coverage Model

Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 19-35

  Sipress, Joel M ^a   Voelker, David J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SUPERIOR   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85166145289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003444732-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Andrews, T., & Burke, F. (2007). What does it mean to think historically? Perspectives: The Newsmagazine of the American Historical Association 45(1), 32-35.
2. Bain, R. (2000). Into the breach: using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, & learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331-352). 352.
3. Booth, A. (2000). Creating a context to enhance student learning in history. In A. Booth & P. Hyland (Eds.), The practice of university history teaching (pp. 31-46). 46.
4. Booth, A. (2003). Teaching history at university: Enhancing learning and understanding. London: Routledge.
5. Booth, A., & Hyland, P. (2000). Developing scholarship in history teaching. In A. Booth & P. Hyland (Eds.), The practice of university history teaching (pp. 1-13). 13.
6. Calder, L. (2002, March). Looking for learning in the history survey. Perspectives: The Newsmagazine of the American Historical Association 40(3), 43-45.
7. Calder, L. (2006a). Uncoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. Journal of American History 92, 1358-70.
8. Calder, L. (2006b). Uncoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. Retrieved on January 10, 2008 from http://www.indiana.edu/~jah/textbooks/2006/calder/index.html
9. Cohen, D. (2005). By the book: Assessing the place of textbooks in U.S. survey courses. Journal of American History, 91, 1405-1415.
10. Estes, T. (2007). Constructing the syllabus: Devising a framework for helping students learn to think like historians. History Teacher, 40, 183-201.
11. Filene, P. (2007). Reframing the survey course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Organization of American Historians, Minneapolis.
12. Grim, V., Pace, D., & Shopkow, L. (2004). Learning to use evidence in the study of history. In D. Pace & J. Middendorf (Eds.), Decoding the disciplines: Helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking (pp. 57-65). 65.
13. Holt, T. (1990). Thinking historically: Narrative, imagination, and understanding. New York: College Entrance Exam Board.
14. Jeffrey, J. (2003, April). The survey, again. OAH Magazine of History 17(3), 52-54.
15. Kornblith, G., & Lasser, C. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the American history survey at the opening of the twenty-first century: A round table discussion. Journal of American History, 87, 1409-1441.
16. Kornblith, G., & Lasser, C. (2006). Beyond best practices: Taking seriously the scholarship of teaching and learning. Journal of American History 92, 1356-57.
17. Lee, P. (2004). Understanding history. In P. Seixas (Ed.), Theorizing historical consciousness (pp. 129-164). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
18. Manning, P. (2006, March). Presenting history to policy makers: Three position papers. Perspectives: The Newsmagazine of the American Historical Association 44(3), 22-24.
19. Musselman, E. (2004). Using structured debate to achieve autonomous students discussion. The History Teacher 37, 335-349.
20. Nelson, C. (1999). On the persistence of unicorns: The trade-off between content and critical thinking revisited. In B. Pescosolido & R. Amizade (Ed.), The social worlds of higher education: Handbook for teaching in a new century (pp. 168-184). Boston: Pine Forge Press.
21. Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
22. Stearns, P., Seixas, P., & Wineburg, S. (Eds.). (2000). Knowing, teaching, & learning history: National and international perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
23. Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (1997). Perspectives on learning history: A case study. Journal of Literacy Research 29, 363-395.
24. Sipress, J. (2004). Why students don’t get evidence and what we can do about it. The History Teacher 37, 351-363.
25. Spoehr, K., & Spoehr, L. (1994). Learning to think historically. Educational Psychologist 29, 71-77.
26. Townsend, R. B. (2005, August). College board examines survey course. OAH Newsletter, 33, 1, 8, 12.
27. Voelker, D. (2008, August). Assessing student understanding in introductory courses: A sample strategy. History Teacher 41, 505-518.
28. Walvoord, B., & Breihan, J. (1990). Arguing and debating: Breihan’s history course. In B. Walvoord & L. McCarthy (Eds.), Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines (pp. 97-143). 143.
29. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
30. Wineburg, S. (1992, March). Probing the depths of students’ historical knowledge. [Electronic version] Perspectives 30(3). Retrieved from http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/1992/9203/9203TEC1.cfm
31. Wineburg, S. (2001a). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32. Wineburg, S. (2001b). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. In S. Wineburg, Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past (pp. 63-88). 88.
33. Wineburg, S. (2004, March). Crazy for history. Journal of American History 90, 1401-1414.