A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO EVIDENCE-CENTERED DESIGN

ETS Research Report Series

Volumn 2003, Issue 1, 2003, Pages i-29

  Mislevy, Robert J ^a   Almond, Russell G ^b   Lukas, Janice F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment design; delivery system; evidence; psychometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85164487709     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23308516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2003.tb01908.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Almond, R.G., Steinberg, L.S., & Mislevy, R.J. (2002). A four-process architecture for assessment delivery, with connections to assessment design. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 1(5). Retrieved June 25, 2003, from http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/jtla/journal/v1n5.shtml.
2. Cronbach, L.J. (1989). Construct validation after thirty years. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Intelligence: Measurement, theory, and public policy (pp. 147–171). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
3. Embretson, S. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.
4. Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., & Rubin, D.B. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
5. Glaser, R., Lesgold, A., & Lajoie, S. (1987). Toward a cognitive theory for the measurement of achievement. In R. Ronning, J. Glover, J. C. Conoley, & J. Witt (Eds.), The influence of cognitive psychology on testing and measurement: Vol. 3. The Buros-Nebraska Symposium on measurement and testing (, pp. 41–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Kane, M.T. (1992) An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527–535.
7. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
8. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23.
9. Mislevy, R.J. (1994). Evidence and inference in educational assessment. Psychometrika, 59, 439–483.
10. Mislevy, R.J., & Gitomer, D.H. (1996). The role of probability-based inference in an intelligent tutoring system. User-Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5, 253–282.
11. Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., & Almond, R.G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–67.
12. Mislevy, R.J., Steinberg, L.S., Breyer, F.J., Almond, R.G., & Johnson, L. (1999). A cognitive task analysis, with implications for designing a simulation-based assessment system. Computers and Human Behavior, 15, 335–374.
13. Schum, D.A. (1994). The evidential foundations of probabilistic reasoning. New York: Wiley.