A blind deconvolution method for neural spike identification

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24: 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2011, NIPS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Ekanadham, Chaitanya ^a   Tranchina, Daniel ^a   Simoncelli, Eero P ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; NEURAL NETWORKS; NEURONS; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS;

'CURRENT; BLIND DECONVOLUTION; CLUSTERINGS; DECONVOLUTION METHOD; EXTRACELLULAR VOLTAGES; HUMAN SUPERVISION; NEURAL SPIKE; SPIKE IDENTIFICATION; SPIKE TRAIN; STATISTICAL INFERENCE;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 85162506342     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. M. S. Lewicki. A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network, 9(4):R53-R78, Nov 1998.
2. M. Sahani. Latent variable models for neural data analysis. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 1999.
3. M Wehr, J S Pezaris, and M Sahani. Simultaneous paired intracellular and tetrode recordings for evaluating the performance of spike sorting algorithms. Neurocomputing, 26-27:1061-1068, 1999.
4. Maneesh Sahani, John S. Pezaris, and Richard A. Andersen.On the separation of signals fromneighboring cells in tetrode recordings. In In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10, pages 222-228. MIT Press, 1998.
5. P. H. van Cittert. Zum einflu der spaltbreite auf die intensittsverteilung in spektrallinien. ii. Zeitschrift fr Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei, 69:298-308, 1931. 10.1007/BF01391351.
6. J. Mendel.Optimal Seismic Deconvolution: An Estimation Based Approach. Academic Press, 1983.
7. Evan Smith and Michael S Lewicki. Efficient coding of time-relative structure using spikes. Neural Computation, 17(1):19-45, Jan 2005.
8. Roger Grosse Rajat Raina, Helen Kwong, and Andrew Y. Ng. Shift-invariant sparse coding for audio classification. In UAI, 2007.
9. J W Pillow, J Shlens, L Paninski, A Sher, A M Litke, E J Chichilnisky, and E P Simoncelli. Spatiotemporal correlations and visual signaling in a complete neuronal population. Nature, 454(7206):995-999, Aug 2008.
10. Jason S. Prentice, Jan Homann, Kristina D. Simmons, Gaper Tkaik, Vijay Balasubramanian, and Philip C. Nelson. Fast, scalable, bayesian spike identification for multi-electrode arrays. PLoSONE, 6(7):e19884, 07 2011.
11. R. Quian Quiroga, Z. Nadasdy, and Y. Ben-Shaul. Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput., 16:1661-1687, August 2004.
12. Ki Yong Kwon and K.Oweiss. Wavelet footprints for detection and sorting of extracellular neural action potentials. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 609 -612, may 2011.
13. Markus Meister, Jerome Pine, and Denis A. Baylor. Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 51(1):95-106, 1994.
14. S. Nirenberg, S. M. Carcieri, A. L. Jacobs, and P. E. Latham. Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders. Nature, 411:698-701, 2001.
15. R. Segev, J. Goodhouse, J. Puchalla, and M. J. Berry. Recording spikes from a large fraction of the ganglion cells in a retinal patch. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10):1154-1161,October 2004.
16. C. Pouzat,O. Mazor, and G. Laurent. Using noise signature to optimize spike-sorting and to assess neuronal classification quality. J Neurosci Methods, 122(1):43-57, 2002.
17. Frank Wood, Michael J. Black, Carlos Vargas-irwin, Matthew Fellows, and John P. Donoghue.On the variability of manual spike sorting. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51:912-918, 2004.
18. Kenneth D. Harris, Darrell A. Henze, Jozsef Csicsvari, Hajime Hirase, Kenneth D, Darrell A. Henze, and Jozsef Csicsvari. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J Neurophysiol, 84:401-414, 2000.
19. Emery N. Brown, Robert E. Kass, and Partha P. Mitra. Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nature neuroscience, 7(5):456-461, May 2004.
20. C Ekanadham, D Tranchina, and E P Simoncelli. Sparse decomposition of transformation-invariant signals with continuous basis pursuit. In Proc. Int'l Conf Acoustics Speech Signal Processing (ICASSP), Los Angeles, CA, May 22-27 2011. IEEE Sig Proc Society.
21. C Ekanadham, D Tranchina, and E P Simoncelli. Sparse decomposition of translation-invariant signals with continuous basis pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011. Accepted for publication.
22. B. A.Olshausen and D. J. Field. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381(6583):607-609, Jun 1996.
23. Ingrid Daubechies, Ronald DeVore, Massimo Fornasier, and C. Sinan Gntrk. Iteratively reweighted least squares minimization for sparse recovery. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 63(1):1-38, 2010.
24. Emmanuel J. C. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted 1 minimization. J. Fourier Analysis and Applications, pages 877-905, 2008.
25. R. Chartrand and Wotao Yin. Iteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2008. ICASSP 2008. IEEE International Conference on, pages 3869 -3872, 31 2008-april 4 2008.
26. Honglak Lee, Alexis Battle, Rajat Raina, and Andrew Y. Ng. Efficient sparse coding algorithms. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, pages 801-808. 2007.
27. M. Grant and S. Boyd. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 1.21. http://cvxr.com/cvx,October 2010.