Spike timing-dependent plasticity as dynamic filter

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23: 24th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2010, NIPS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Schmiedt, Joscha T ^a   Albers, Christian ^a   Pawelzik, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BANDPASS FILTERS; MODULATION; NEURAL NETWORKS; NEURONS; NONLINEAR FILTERING; TIMING CIRCUITS;

ACTION-POTENTIALS; ARBITRARY TIME; COMPLEX ACTIONS; DYNAMIC FILTER; FILTER PROPERTIES; MINIMAL MODEL; PRESYNAPTIC; SPIKE TIMING DEPENDENT PLASTICITIES; SYNAPTIC MODIFICATION; TIME COURSE;

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS;

EID: 85161962260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. W. Levy and O. Steward. Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus. Neuroscience, 8(4):791-797, 1983.
2. H. Markram, J. Lubke, M. Frotscher, and B. Sakmann. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science, 1997.
3. G. Q. Bi and M. M. Poo. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(24):10464-72, 1998.
4. P. J. Sjöström, E. A. Rancz, A. Roth, and M. Häusser. Dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity. Physiological Reviews, 88(2):769-840, 2008.
5. N. Caporale and Y. Dan. Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. Annual Review in Neuroscience, 2008.
6. R. C. Froemke and Y. Dan. Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature, 2002.
7. R. C. Froemke, I. A. Tsay, M. Raad, J. D. Long, and Y. Dan. Contribution of individual spikes in burst-induced long-term synaptic modification. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95(3):1620-9, 2006.
8. H. X. Wang, R. C. Gerkin, D. W. Nauen, and G. Q. Bi. Coactivation and timing-dependent integration of synaptic potentiation and depression. Nature Neuroscience, 8(2):187-93, 2005.
9. A. Morrison, M. Diesmann, and W. Gerstner. Phenomenological models of synaptic plasticity based on spike timing. Biological Cybernetics, 98(6):459-78, 2008.
10. P. J. Sjöström, G. G. Turrigiano, and S. B. Nelson. Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron, 32(6):1149-1164, 2001.
11. C. Clopath, L. Büsing, E. Vasilaki, and W. Gerstner. Connectivity reflects coding: a model of voltage-based STDP with homeostasis. Nature Neuroscience, 13(3):344-52, 2010.
12. B. Kosco. Differential Hebbian learning. AIP Conference Proceedings 151 on Neural Networks for Computing, 1987.
13. A. H. Klopf. A drive-reinforcement model of single neuron function: An alternative to the Hebbian neuronal model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 151(1):265-270, 1986.
14. P. D. Roberts. Computational consequences of temporally asymmetric learning rules: I. differential Hebbian learning. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 7(3):235-246, 1999.
15. A. Saudargiene, B. Porr, and F. Wörgötter. How the shape of pre-and postsynaptic signals can influence STDP: a biophysical model. Neural Computation, 2004.
16. T. Nevian and B. Sakmann. Spine Ca2+ signaling in spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(43):11001-13, 2006.
17. M. V. Tsodyks and H. Markram. The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(2):719-723, 1997.
18. E. Tanaka, H. Higashi, and S. Nishi. Membrane properties of guinea pig cingulate cortical neurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol, 65(4):808-821, 1991.
19. L. Nowak, P. Bregestovski, P. Ascher, A. Herbet, and A. Prochiantz. Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones. Nature, 307(5950):462-5, 1984.
20. J. E. Lisman. A Mechanism for Memory Storage Insensitive to Molecular Turnover: A Bistable Autophosphorylating Kinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 82(9):3055-3057, 1985.
21. U. S. Bhalla and R. Iyengar. Emergent Properties of Networks of Biological Signaling Pathways. Science, 283(5400):381-387, 1999.
22. J. P. Pfister andW. Gerstner. Triplets of spikes in a model of spike timing-dependent plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(38):9673-82, 2006.
23. G. Bi and M. Poo. Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24:139-66, 2001.
24. M. Tsodyks, K. Pawelzik, and H. Markram. Neural networks with dynamic synapses. Neural Computation, 10(4):821-35, 1998.
25. M. Lengyel, J. Kwag, O. Paulsen, and P. Dayan. Matching storage and recall: hippocampal spike timing-dependent plasticity and phase response curves. Nature Neuroscience, 8(12):1677-83, 2005.
26. F. Wörgötter and B. Porr. Temporal sequence learning, prediction, and control: a review of different models and their relation to biological mechanisms. Neural Computation, 17(2):245-319, 2005.
27. E. M. Izhikevich. Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling. Cerebral Cortex, 17(10):2443-52, 2007.
28. U. Rutishauser, I. B. Ross, A. N. Mamelak, and E. M. Schuman. Human memory strength is predicted by theta-frequency phase-locking of single neurons. Nature, 464(7290):903-7, 2010.
29. Y. Yamaguchi, N. Sato, H. Wagatsuma, Z. Wu, C. Molter, and Y. Aota. A unified view of theta-phase coding in the entorhinal-hippocampal system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(2):197-204, 2007.
30. A. Jeewajee, C. Lever, S. Burton, J. O'Keefe, and N. Burgess. Environmental novelty is signaled by reduction of the hippocampal theta frequency. Hippocampus, 18(4):340-8, 2008.