Kernel-based Extraction of Slow Features: Complex Cells Learn Disparity and Translation Invariance from Natural Images

NIPS 2002: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 253-260

  Bray, Alistair ^a   Martinez, Dominique ^a  

^a LORIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; IMAGE CODING;

COMPLEX CELLS; GENERAL MODEL; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER; INVARIANT PROPERTIES; LEARN+; NATURAL IMAGES; SIMPLE++; SLOW FEATURE ANALYSIS(SFA); TRANSLATION INVARIANCE;

INVARIANCE;

EID: 85156213773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. L. Wiskott and T.J. Sejnowski. Slow feature analysis: Unsupervised learning of invariances. Neural Computation, 14(4), 2002.
2. J. V. Stone and A. J. Bray. A learning rule for extracting spatio-temporal invariances. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 6(3):429-436, 1995.
3. James V. Stone. Blind source separation using temporal predictability. Neural Computation, (13):1559-1574, 200l.
4. P. Foldiak. Learning invariance from transformation sequences. Neural Computation, 3(2):194-200, 1991.
5. H. G. Barrow and A. J. Bray. A model of adaptive development of complex cortical cells. In 1. Aleksander and J. Taylor, editors, Artificial Neural Networks II: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Elsevier Publishers, 1992.
6. K. Fukushima. Self-organisation of shift-invariant receptive fields. Neural Networks, 12:826-834, 1999.
7. M. Stewart Bartlett and T.J. Sejnowski. Learning viewpoint invariant face representations from visual experience in an attractor network. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 9(3):399-417, 1998.
8. E. T. Rolls and T. Milward. A model of invariant object recognition in the visual system: Learning rules, activation functions, lateral inhibition, and information-based performance measures. Neural Computation, 12:2547-2572, 2000.
9. J. V. Stone. Learning perceptually salient visual parameters using spatiotemporal smoothness constraints. Neural Computation, 8(7):1463-1492, October 1996.
10. K. Kayser, W. Einhiiuser, O. Dummer, P. Konig, and K. Kording. Extracting slow subspaces from natural videos leads to complex cells. In ICANN 2001, LNCS 2130, pages 1075-1080. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001, 200l.
11. J. Hurri and A. Hyvarinen. Simple-cell-like receptive fields maximise temporal coherence in natural video. Submitted, http://www.cis.hut.fi/)armo/publications. 2002.
12. D. Martinez and A. Bray. Nonlinear blind source separation using kernels. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 14(1):228-235, Jan. 2003.
13. G. Baudat and F. Anouar. Kernel-based methods and function approximation. International Joint Conference of Neural Networks IJCNN, pages 1244-1249, 200l.
14. A. J. Bell and T. J. Sejnowski. The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research, 37:3327-3338, 1997.
15. B.A. Olhausen and D.J. Field. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381:607-609, 1996.
16. E.T. Rolls and G. Deco. Computational Neuroscience of Vision. Oxford University Press, 2002.