REFLECTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATOR AND HIS DISCIPLINE

The Mathematics Teacher Educator as a Developing Professional: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 4

Volumn 4, Issue , 2008, Pages 177-200

  Krainer, Konrad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85147063367     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotná, J. (2005). Mirror images of an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 359-381.
2. Altrichter, H., Posch P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work. An introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.
3. Ball, D., & Even, R. (Eds.). (in preparation). The International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (ICMI) — The Fifteenth ICMI Study: The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics.
4. Bender, P., & Schreiber, A. (1985). Operative Genese der Geometrie [Operative genesis of geometry]. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
5. Bishop, A., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Laborde, C. (Eds.). (1996). International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
6. Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cooney, T. (1994). Research and teacher education. In search of common ground developed. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 608-636.
8. Cooney, T., & Krainer, K. (2000). The notion of networking: The fusion of the public and private components of teachers’ professional development. In M. Fernández (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-NA 22) (Vol. 2, pp. 531-537). Columbus, OH: ERIC.
9. Cooney, T., & Shealy, B. (1994). Conceptualizing teacher education as field of inquiry: Theoretical and practical implications. In J. Ponte & F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th PME International Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 225-232). Lisbon, Portugal: University of Lisbon.
10. Dörfler, W. (1987). Die Genese mathematischer Objekte und Operationen aus Handlungen als kognitive Konstruktion [The genesis of mathematical objects and operations from actions as cognitive constructions]. In W. Dörfler & R. Fischer (Eds.), Kognitive Aspekte mathematischer Begriffsentwicklung (pp. 55-126). Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
11. Fischer, R., Krainer, K., Malle, G., Posch, P., Zenkl, M. (Eds.). (1985). Pädagogik undFachdidaktikfür Mathematiklehrer [Pedagogy and subject-specific methodology for mathematics teachers]. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
12. Fischer, R., & Malle, G. (1985). Mensch und Mathematik: Eine Einführung in didaktisches Denken und Handeln [Man and mathematics: An introduction to didactical thinking and doing]. Mannheim, Germany: Bibliographisches Institut.
13. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
14. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
15. Grouws, D., & Schultz, K. (1966). Mathematics teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 442-458). New York: Macmillan.
16. Jaworski, B. (1999). What does it mean to promote development in teaching. A response to Ron Tzur’s paper: Becoming a mathematics teacher-educator: conceptualising the terrain through self-reflective analysis. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd PME International Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 183-193). Haifa, Israel: Israel Institute of Technology.
17. Jaworski, B., Wood, T., & Dawson, S. (1999). (Eds.). Mathematics teacher education. Critical international perspectives. London: Falmer Press.
18. Krainer, K. (1993). Powerful tasks: A contribution to a high level of acting and reflecting in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 65-93.
19. Krainer, K. (1994). PFL-Mathematics: A teacher in-service education course as a contribution to the improvement of professional practice in mathematics instruction. In P. Ponte & J. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 104-111). Lisbon, Portugal: University of Lisbon.
20. Krainer, K. (1998). Some considerations on problems and perspectives of mathematics teacher inservice education. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Perez (Eds.), The 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME 8) Selected Lectures (pp. 303-321). Sevilla, Spain: S.A.E.M. Thales.
21. Krainer, K. (1999). Promoting reflection and networking as an intervention strategy in professional development programs for mathematics teachers and mathematics teacher educators. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd PME Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 159-168). Haifa, Israel: Technion - Israel Institute of Technology.
22. Krainer, K. (2003). Innovations in mathematics, science and technology teaching (IMST2): Initial outcome of a nation-wide initiative for upper secondary schools in Austria. Mathematics Education Review, 16, 49-60.
23. Krainer, K. (2005). Pupils, teachers and schools as mathematics learners. In C. Kynigos (Ed.), Mathematics education as a field of research in the knowledge society. Proceedings of the First GARME Conference (pp. 34-51). Athens, Greece: Hellenic Letters.
24. Krainer, K. (2006). How can schools put mathematics in their centre? Improvement = content + community + context. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (V ol. 1, pp. 84-89). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
25. Krainer, K. (2007). Mathematics teacher education: A practical field and an emerging field of research. In Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach (Ed.), Professional development of mathematics teachers — Research and practice from an international perspective (pp. 43-45). Proceedings of a conference held at the MFO, 11-17 Nov. 2007, Report No. 52/2007. See http://www.mfo.de/cgi-bin/path?cgi-bin/tagung_espe?type=21&tnr=0746
26. Krainer, K., Goffree, F., & Berger, P.(Eds.). (1999). On research in mathematics teacher education. European research in mathematics education I.III. Osnabrück, Germany: Forschungsinstitut für Mathematikdidaktik.
27. Lin, F.-L., & Cooney, T. (Eds.). (2001). Making sense of mathematics teacher education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
28. Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
29. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
30. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. J., & Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Boston: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
31. Peter-Koop, A., Begg, A., Breen, C., & Santos-Wagner, V. (Eds.). (2003). Collaboration in teacher education. Examples from the context of mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
32. Rauch, F., & Kreis, I. (Eds.). (2007/ Lernen durch fachbezogene Schulentwicklung. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
33. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
34. Schuster, A. (2008). Warum Lehrerinnen undLehrer schreiben [Why teachers write]. Doctoral thesis. Klagenfurt, Austria: University of Klagenfurt.
35. Strässer, R., Brandell, G., Grevholm, B., & Helenius, O.(Eds.). (2004). Educating for the future. Proceedings of an International Research Symposium on Mathematics Teachers Education. Goeteborg, Sweden: NCM, Goeteborg University.
36. Tzur, R. (1999). Becoming a mathematics teacher-educator: conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd PME International Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 169-182). Haifa, Israel: Israel Institute of Technology.
37. Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming a mathematics teacher-educator. Conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 259-283.
38. Wagenschein, M. (1970). Ursprüngliches Verstehen und exaktes Denken [Original understanding and precise thinking]. Vol. 2. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
39. Willke, H. (1999). Systemtheorie II.ĝ Interventionstheorie [System theory II: Intervention theory]. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius UTB.
40. Wittmann, E. Ch. (1995). Mathematics education as a “Design Science”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 355-374.
41. Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (1999). Interweaving the training of Mathematics teacher-educators and the professional development of mathematics teachers. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd PME International Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 141-158). Haifa, Israel: Israel Institute of Technology.
42. Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teachers educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 5-32.