Capturing Ideas in Digital Things: A New Twist on the Old Problem of Inert Knowledge

Video Research in the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 547-563

  Stevens, Reed ^a  

^a WA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145862664     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203877258-43     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Barron, B., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding:Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271-311.
2. Becker, H. (1972) School is a lousy place to learn anything in. American Behavioral Scientist, 16, 85-105.
3. Becker, H. S. (1995). The power of inertia. Qualitative Sociology, 18, 301-309.
4. Bowker, G., & Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: APA Books.
6. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Dewey, J. (1934). The logic of inquiry. New York: Holt.
8. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
9. Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370-404). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10. Goodwin, C. (2000). Practices of seeing: Visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157-182). London:Sage.
11. Goodwin, C. (2003a). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Goodwin, C. (2003b). The semiotic body in its environment. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourses of the body (pp. 19-42). New York: Palgrave.
13. Hall R. (1990). Making mathematics on paper: Constructing representations of stories about related linear functions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine.
14. Hanks, W. F. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
18. Kita, S. (Ed.). (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Psathas, G. (1979). Organisational features of direction maps. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 203-225). New York: Irvington.
22. Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Mejia Arauz, R., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 175-203.
23. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
24. Stevens, R. (2000a). Who counts what as math: Emergent and assigned mathematical problems in a project-based classroom. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 105-144). New York: Elsevier.
25. Stevens, R. (2000b). Divisions of labor in school and in the workplace: Comparing computer and paper-supported activities across settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 373-401.
26. Stevens, R. (2002b). Keeping it complex in an era of big education. In T. Koschmann, N. Miyake, & R. Hall. (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning II: Continuing the conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
27. Stevens, R. (2002a). Video traces: An Innovative digital medium supporting interpretation, exchange, and knowledge construction. Innovations in Learning Colloquium Series. Stanford University.
28. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1997). Seeing tornado: How Video Traces mediate visitor understandings of (natural?) spectacles in a science museum, Science Education, 18(6), 735-748.
29. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Stevens, R., & Toro-Martell, S. (2003). Leaving a trace: Supporting museum visitor interpretation and interaction with digital media annotation systems. Journal of Museum Education, 28(2), 25-31.
31. Warner Studios. (1993). “The Five Minute University” from Gilda Live 1980 [video recording]. Burbank, CA: Warner Studios.
32. Wenger, E. (1990). Toward a theory of cultural transparency: Elements of a social discourse of the visible and the invisible. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California at Irvine.
33. Whitehead, A. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Macmillan.