A Political Science Perspective on Education Policy Analysis

Handbook of Education Policy Research

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 57-70

  McDonnell, Lorraine M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145841406     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880968-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Abernathy, S. F. (2005). School choice of the future of American democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (Eds.). (2002). Policy dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Béland, D. (2005a). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy and Administration, 39, 1-18.
6. Béland, D. (2005b). Social Security: History and politics from the New Deal to the privatization debate. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
7. Berkman, M. B., & Pultzer, E. (2005). Ten thousand democracies: Politics and public opinion in America’s school districts. Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
8. Binder, A. J. (2002). Contentious curricula: Afrocentism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Boyd, W. L., Plank, D. N., & Sykes, G. (2000). Teachers unions in hard times. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and education reform (pp.174-210). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
10. Campbell, A. L. (2003). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 21-38.
12. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
13. Cigler, A. J. (1994). Research gaps in the study of interest group representation. In W. Crotty, M. A. Schwartz, & J. C. Green (Eds.), Representing interests and interest groups (pp.29-36). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
14. Clarke, S. E., Hero, R. E., Sidney, M. S., Fraga, L. R., & Erlichson, B. A. (2006). Multiethnic moments: The politics of urban education reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
15. Fuhrman, S. H., & Elmore, R. F. (1990). Understanding local control in the wake of state education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 82-96.
16. Geva-May, I. (2004). Riding the wave of opportunity: Termination in public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 309-333.
17. Gordon, G. (2003). Dead on arrival: The politics of health care in twentieth-century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Hacker, J. S. (2002). The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Heclo, H. (1994). Ideas, interests, and institutions. In L. C. Dodd & C. Jillson (Eds.), The dynamics of American politics: Approaches and interpretations (pp.366-392). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20. Henig, J., Hula, R., Orr, M., & Pedescleaux, D. (1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Henig, J. R., & Rich, W. C. (Eds.). (2004). Mayors in the middle: Politics, race, and mayoral control of urban schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Hochschild, J., & Scovronick, N. (2003). The American dream and the public schools. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Howell, W. G. (Ed.). (2005). Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
24. Itkonen, T. (2007). Politics of passion: Collective action from pain and loss. American Journal of Education, 113, 577-604.
25. Jenks, J. W. (1891). School-book legislation. Political Science Quarterly, 6, 90-125.
26. Kelman, S. (1987). Making public policy: A hopeful view of American government. New York: Basic Books.
27. Kingdon, J. W. (1993). Politicians, self-interest, and ideas. In G. E. Marcus & R. L. Hanson (Eds.), Reconsidering the democratic public (pp.73-89). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
28. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
29. Kirst, M. W. (2003). Mayoral influence, new regimes, and public school governance. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 102(10), 196-218.
30. Lieberman, R. C. (2002). Ideas, institutions, and political order: Explaining political change. American Political Science Review, 96, 697-712.
31. Longoria, T., Jr. (1998). School politics in Houston: The impact of business involvement. In C. Stone (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp.184-198). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
32. Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. Majone, G. (1996). Public policy and administration: Ideas, interests, and institutions. In R. E. Goodin & H. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp.610-627). New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Manna, P. (2006). School’s in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
35. Mansbridge, J. J. (Ed.). (1990). Beyond self-interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
37. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York:Free Press.
38. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2000). Democracy and schooling: An institutional perspective. In L. M. McDonnell, P. M. Timpane, & R. Benjamin (Eds.), Rediscovering the democratic purposes of education (pp.148-173). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
39. Marschall, M. J. (2005). Minority incorporation and local school boards. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp.173-198). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
40. Mawhinney, H. B. (2001). Theoretical approaches to understanding interest groups. Educational Policy, 15, 187-214.
41. Mazzoni, T. L. (1991). Analyzing state school policymaking: An arena model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 115-138.
42. McDonnell, L. M. (2004). Politics, persuasion, and educational testing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. McDonnell, L. M. (2005). No Child Left Behind and the federal role in education: Evolution or revolution? Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 19-38.
44. McGuinn, P. J. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965-2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
45. Meier, K. J., & Juenke, E. G. (2005). Electoral structure and the quality of representation on school boards. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged:School boards and the future of education politics (pp.199-227). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
46. Melnick, R. S. (1995). Separation of powers and the strategy of rights:The expansion of special education. In M. K. Landy & M. Levin (Eds.), The new politics of public policy (pp. 23-46). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
47. Mettler, S. (2005). Soldiers to citizens: The G.I. Bill and the making of the greatest generation. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 55-73.
49. Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 738-770.
50. Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion:The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60, 126-148.
51. Miskel, C., & Song, M. (2004). Passing Reading First: Prominence and processes in an elite policy network. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 89-109.
52. Moe, T. M. (1990). Political institutions: The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6(Special Issue), 213-254.
53. Moe, T. M. (2000). The two democratic purposes of public education. In L. M. McDonnell, P. M. Timpane, & R. Benjamin (Eds.), Rediscovering the democratic purposes of education (pp.127-147). Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.
54. Moe, T. M. (2005). Teacher unions and school board elections. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp.254-287). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
55. Orr, M. (1999). Black social capital: The politics of school reform in Baltimore, 1986-1998. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
56. Orr, M. (2004). Political Science and Education Research: An exploratory look at two political science journals. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 11-16.
57. Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45, 595-628.
58. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251-267.
59. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60. Pierson, P. (2005). The study of policy development. Journal of Policy History, 17, 34-51.
61. Portz, J., Stein, L., & Jones, R. R. (1999). City schools and city politics:Institutions and leadership in Pittsburgh, Boston, and St. Louis. Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.
62. Reed, D. S. (2001). On equal terms? The constitutional politics of educational opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63. Reich, R. B. (Ed.). (1988). The power of public ideas. Cambridge, MA:Ballinger.
64. Rich, W. C. (1996). Black mayors and school politics: The failure of reform in Detroit, Gary, and Newark. New York: Garland.
65. Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, pressures, and the tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.
66. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools:Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
67. Shipps, D. (2006). School reform, corporate style: Chicago 1880-2000. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
68. Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review, 93, 363-380.
69. Stone, C. N. (Ed.). (1998). Changing urban education. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
70. Stone, C. N., Henig, J. R., Jones, B. D., & Pierannunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence:University Press of Kansas.
71. Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Rev. ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
72. Tichenor, D. J. (2002). Dividing lines: The politics of immigration control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2005). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
74. Wirt, F. M., & Kirst, M. W. (2005). The political dynamics of American education (3rd ed.). Richmond, CA: McCutchon Publishing.
75. Wong, K. K., & Shen, F. X. (2005). When mayors lead urban schools:Assessing the effects of mayoral takeover. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp.81-101). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.