Challenging perspectives, changing practices: Doctoral education in transition

Changing Practices of Doctoral Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 239-248

  Green, Bill ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145513324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203870488-28     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Carter, P. (2004) Material Thinking, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
2. Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, Cambridge: Blackwell.
3. Clark, W. (2006) Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London:Sage.
5. Green, B. (2005) Unfinished business? Subjectivity and supervision, Higher Education Research and Development, 24(2): 151-163.
6. Green, B. and Lee, A. (1995) Theorising Postgraduate Pedagogy, Australian Universities Review, 38(2): 40-45.
7. Green, B. and Lee, A. (1999) Educational research, disciplinarity and postgraduate pedagogy: on the subject of supervision, in A. Holbrook and S. Johnston (eds), Supervision of Postgraduate Research in Education, Coldstream, Victoria: Australian Association for Research in Education, pp. 207-222.
8. Hainge, G. (2004) The death of education, a sad tale (DEST): of anti-pragmatic pragmatics and the loss of the absolute in Australian tertiary education, in J. Kenway, E. Bullen and S. Rob (eds), Innovation and Tradition: The Arts, Humanities and the Knowledge Economy, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 35-45.
9. Hoskin, K. (1993) Education and the genesis of disciplinarity: an unexpected reversal, in E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway and D. J. Sylvan (eds), Knowledge: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, pp. 271-304.
10. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001) Objectual relations, in T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina and E. van Savigny (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, New York: Routledge, pp. 175-188.
11. Lee, A. and Williams, C. (1999) ‘Forged in fire’: narratives of trauma in PhD pedagogy, Southern Review, 32(1): 6-26.
12. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2003) ‘Mode 2' revisited: the new production of knowledge, Minerva, 41: 179-194.
15. Park, C. (2005) New variant PhD: the changing nature of the doctorate in the UK, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2): 189-207.
16. Pinar, W. F. (2004) What Is Curriculum Theory?, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Pinar, W. F. (2006) The problem with curriculum and pedagogy, in The Synoptic Text and Other Essays: Curriculum Development and the Reconceptualization, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 109-120.
18. Rip, A. (2004) Strategic research, post-modern universities and research training, Higher Education Policy, 17: 153-166.
19. Schatzki, T. R. (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Schatzki, T. R. (2001) Practice theory, in T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina and E. van Savigny (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, New York: Routledge, pp. 1-14.
21. Somerville, M. (2007) Postmodern emergence, Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2): 225-243.
22. Thrift, N. (1996) ‘Strange country’: meaning, use and style in non-representational theories, in Spatial Formations, London: Sage, pp. 1-50.