Leadership Development in Europe

International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 341-366

  Møller, Jorunn ^a   Schratz, Michael ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^c Austrian Leadership Academy   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145511618     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203872239-26     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Baráth, T. (2006). Az iskolavezetés jellemzői és az intézmény eredményessége, hatékonysága. In Új Pedag- giai Szemle. 2006/7-8. 56-72. Features of school management, school efficiency and effectiveness. In New Pedagogical Review 7-8, 56-72.
2. Baráth, T. and Cseh, G. (2002). Az intézményi auton-mia feltételrendszere - Szervezeti és jogi jellemzők. Kézirat. (The condition system of institutional autonomy - Organizational and legislation characteristics. Unpublished manuscript.)
3. Baron, G. (1970). Some aspects of the headmaster tradition. In P.W. Musgrave (Ed.) Sociology, history and education. London: Methuen.
4. Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Berg, G. (2000). Steering in and steering of the school. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T.E. Hauge and J. Møller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers. International perspectives in changing times (pp.195-210). London:Falmer Press.
6. Bernstein, B. (1977). Class, codes and control: Vol. 3. Towards a theory of educational transmissions (2nd ed.), London: Routledge.
7. Bolam, R. (2004). Refl ections on the NCSL from a historical perspective. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32(3), 251-267.
8. Bredeson, P. (1996). New directions in the preparation of educational leaders. In Leithwood, K., Chapman, J., Corson, D., Hallinger, P. and Hart, A. (1996). International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 251-278). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
9. Bush, T. (2004). Editorial: The National College for School Leadership: Purpose, Power and Prospects. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32(3), 243-249.
10. Brown, M. (1998). The tyranny of the international horse race. In R. Slee and G. Weiner with S. Tomlinson (Eds.), School effectiveness for whom? Challenges to the school effectiveness and school improvement movements (pp. 33-47). London: Falmer Press.
11. Day, C. (2007). Sustaining success in challenging contexts. Leadership in English schools. In C. Day and K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change. An international perspective (pp. 59-709). Dordrecht: Springer
12. Engeström, Y. (1999). Situated learning at the threshold of the new millennium. In Bliss, J., Säljö, R. and Light, P. (Eds.), Learning sites. Social and technological resources for learning (pp. 249-258). Amsterdam:Pergamon
13. Fischer, W. and Schratz, M. (1996). Veden’ a rozvoj skoly. Do budoucnosti s novou kulturou r’zen’. Brno:Nakladatelstv’.
14. Fischer, W. and Schratz, M. (1999) Schule leiten und gestalten. Mit einer neuen Führungskultur in die Zukunft. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.
15. Grace. G. (1995). School leadership. Beyond education management. An essay in policy scholarship. London:Falmer Press.
16. Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders. Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. Thousand Oaks: Paul Chapman Publishing.
17. Hegtun, A. (2007). “Improving School Leadership”. Professional skoleledelse - noe alle vil - trenger vi OECD for å få det til? (Professional school leadership - do we need OECD to accomplish the goal?). Unpublished Master thesis in Educational Leadership, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.
18. Helsby, G. (1999). Changing teachers’ work. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Huber, S. (2004). Preparing school leaders for the 21st century. An international comparison of development programs in 15 countries. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
20. Johannesson, I.A., Lindblad, S. and Simola, H. (2002). An inevitable progress? Educational restructuring in Finland, Iceland and Sweden at the turn of the millenium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(3), 325-340.
21. Johansson, O. (2004). A democratic, learning and communicative leadership? Journal of Educational Administration, 42(6), 697-708.
22. Johnson, L., Møller, J., Jacobson, S. and Wong, K.C. (in press). Cross-national comparison in the International Successful School Principalship Project (ISSPP): The United States, Norway and China. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(5).
23. Karlsen, G. (2000). Decentralized centralism: framework for a better understanding of governance in the field of education. Journal of Education Policy, 15(5), 525-538.
24. Karlsen, G. (2002). Educational policy and educational programmes in the European Union: a tool for political integration and economic competition? In J. A. Ibàñez-Martin and J. Gonzalo (Eds.), Education in Europe policies and politics (pp. 23-49). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Leithwood, K. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 217-235.
26. Lundgren, U. (1990). Educational policy-making, decentralisation and evaluation. In Granheim, M., Kogan, M. and Lundgren, U. (Eds.), Evaluation as policymaking. Introducing evaluation into a national decentralised educational system (pp. 23-42). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
27. MacBeath, J. (2006). Evaluation in European schools: A story of change. Keynote address to the European Commission, Frascati, April 14.
28. Maritzen, N. (2000). Funktionen des Schulprogramms im Rahmen eines Steuerungskonzeptes. Pädagogik 4, 36-40.
29. Moos, L., Møller, J. and Johansson, O. (2004). A Scandinavian perspective on educational leadership. The Educational Forum, 68(3), 200-211.
30. Mulford, B. (2003). School leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness, paper commissioned by OECD Education and Training Policy Division.
31. Møller, J. (1996). Rethinking educational leadership. EERA Bulletin, 2(3), 13-24.
32. Møller, J. (2006). Democratic Schooling in Norway: Implications for Leadership in Practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, Special issue on “International Perspectives on Leadership for Social Justice”, 5(1), 53-69.
33. Møller, J. (2007). Educational leadership and the new language of learning. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(1), 31-48.
34. OECD (2007). Improving school leadership. Participating country background reports. Retrieved May 12, 2007, from http://www.oecd.org/document/53/0, 2340, en_2649_34859095_38529205_1_1_1_1, 00. html
35. Olsen, J. P. (2002). Towards a European administrative space. ARENA, Working Paper, No 26, August.
36. Pol, M. (1997). Management of Czech schools: with or without teachers’ participation? Budapest, RSS CEU. Final report.
37. Pol, M. and Rabuöicová, M. (1999). Governance and participation in Czech schools. In R. Bolan, F. v. Wieringen (Eds.), Research on educational management in Europe (pp. 110-122). Münster: Waxmann.
38. Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Educational Policy, 18(5), 459-480.
39. Reynolds, D. and Teddlie, C.; with Creemers, B., Scheerens, J, and Townsend, T. (2000). An introduction to school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie and D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 3-26). London: Falmer Press.
40. Rolff, H.-G. and Schmidt, H. J. (2002). Schulleitung und Schulaufsicht. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
41. Rosenbusch, H. S. (1995). Lehrer und Schulräte. Ein strukturell gestörtes Verhältnis. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
42. Schley, W. and Schratz, M. (2006). Leadership Academy - Professionalisierung von Führungspersonen. Schulmanagement, 2, 28-30.
43. Schratz, M. (1996a). Die neue Qualität von Schulleitung - Schule als lernende Organisation. In W. Specht and J. Thonhauser. (Eds.), Schulqualität: Entwicklungen, Befunde, Perspektiven (pp. 173-222). Innsbruck:Studienverlag.
44. Schratz, M. (1996b). Die Rolle der Schulaufsicht in der autonomen Schulentwicklung. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.
45. Schratz, M. (2003). From administering to leading a school: Challenges in German-speaking counties. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 395-416.
46. Schratz, M. (2006). Schulinspektion und die Folgen für Schulentwicklung und Schulprogramm. Lernende Schule, 9, 14-17.
47. Schratz, M. and Steiner-Löffler, U. (1997). Rady Skol v Rakousku. In M. Pol and M. Rabusicova (Eds.), Správa a Rizen’ Skol (pp. 82-95). Brno: Paido.
48. Sejersted, F. (1997). Lederskap og demokratisk kapitalisme (Leadership and democratic capitalism). In H. Byrkjefl ot (Ed.), Fra styring til ledelse (From management to leadership) (pp. 33-53). Bergen:Fagbokforlaget.
49. Slavikova, L. (2007). School leadership for an integrated Europe. Paper presented at the International Conference “New Policies for School Leadership”, 10-12 May, 2007, in Vilnius.
50. Sugrue, C. (2005). Principalship. Beyond pleasure, pain and passion. In Sugrue, C. (Ed.), Passionate principalship:Learning from life histories of school leaders (pp. 161-184). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
51. Telhaug, A.O., Mediås, O.A. and Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245-283.
52. Thrupp, M. (2005). The National College for School Leadership: A Critique. Retrieved May 9, 2007, from http://www.soc-for-ed-studies.org.uk/pdfs/thrupp.pdf
53. Tjeldvoll, A., Wales, C. and Welle-Strand, A. (2005). School leadership training under globalisation: Comparisons of the UK, the US and Norway. Managing Global Transitions, 3(1): 23-49.
54. Wales, C., and Welle-Strand, A. (2005). School Management Training. HEAD Country Report: Norway. Studies in Education Management Research, No. 16, Centre for Education Management Research (CEM), Norwegian School of Management (BI).
55. Watschinger, J. (1999). Peer-Gruppe entsteht. In P. Höllrigl and E. M. Lanthaler (Eds.), Mit kritischen Freunden unterwegs. Zu einer neuen Qualität von Schulführung (pp. 35-41). Bozen: Pädagogisches Institut der deutschen Sprachgruppe.
56. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.