White Water during Inquiry Learning: Understanding the Place of Disagreements in the Process of Collaboration

Inquiry In Education: Volume II: Overcoming Barriers to Successful Implementation

Volumn 2, Issue , 2017, Pages 149-164

  Barfurth, Marion A ^a   Shore, Bruce M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145155985     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315092669-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Barfurth, M. A. (1994). The collaborative process as seen through children’s disagreements while learning science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in educational psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC.
2. Bevevino, M. M., Dengel, J., and Adams, K. (1999). Constructivist theory in the classroom:Internalizing concepts through inquiry learning. Clearing House, 72, 275-278.
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Byers, A., and Fitzgerald, M. A. (2002). Networking for leadership, inquiry, and systematic thinking: A new approach to inquiry-based learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 81-91.
5. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., and Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquirybased learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391-450.
6. Eisenberg, A. R., and Garvey, C. (1981). Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4, 149-170.
7. Emihovich, C., and Battaglia, C. (2000). Creating cultures for collaborative inquiry: New challenges for school leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3, 225-238.
8. Feldman, A., Konold, C., and Coulter, B. (2000). Network science a decade later: The Internet and classroom learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Hodson, D. (1999). Building a case for a sociocultural and inquiry-oriented view of science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 241-249.
10. Lonka, K., Hakkarainen, K., and Sintonen, M. (2000). Progressive inquiry learning for children:Experiences, possibilities, limitations. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 8, 7-27.
11. Looi, C.-K. (1999). Interactive learning environments for promoting inquiry learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 27, 3-22.
12. Maor, D., and Taylor, P. C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 839-854.
13. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards:A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Pappas, M. L. (2000). Managing the inquiry learning environment. School Library of Media Activities Monthly, 16(7), 27-30.
15. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: Viking.
16. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) and D. Kuhn and R.S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception and language (5th ed., pp. 679-744). New York: Wiley.
17. Roth, W.-M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment:Interactions and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 709-736.
18. Schmidt, P. R. (1999). Inquiry and literacy learning in science. Reading Teacher, 52, 789-792.
19. Tudge, J., and Rogoff, B. (1989). Peer influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives. In M. H. Bornstein and J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. VanFossen, P. J., and Shiveley, J. M. (1997). Things that make you go “Hmmm…": Creating inquiry “problems” in the elementary social studies classroom. Social Studies, 88, 71-77.
21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. White, B. Y., and Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Science, 16, 90-91.
23. Zack, V., and Graves, B. (2001). Making mathematical meaning through dialogue: “Once you think of it, the Z minus three seems pretty weird.” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 229-271.