Collaborative evaluation of learning objects

Online Education using Learning Objects

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 138-153

  Nesbit, Jhon C ^a   Belfer, Karen ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144956743     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203964538-24     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Assink, E. and van der Linden, J. (1993) Computer controlled spelling instruction: A case study in courseware design, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(1): 17-28.
2. Baumgartner, P. and Payr, S. (1996) (accessed 27 April 2002) Learning as action: A social science approach to the evaluation of interactive media. Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, (Online) http://www.webcom.com/journal/baumgart.html.
3. Dobson, M. and McCracken, J. (2001) Evaluating technology-supported teaching and learning: A catalyst to organizational change, Interactive Learning Environments, 9(2): 143-70.
4. Gibbs, W., Graves, P.R. and Bernas, R. S. (2001) Evaluation guidelines for multimedia courseware, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1): 2-17.
5. IEEE (2002) (accessed 16 March 2003) Draft standard for Learning Object Metadata (LOM), Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC), (Online) http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_WD6_4.pdf.
6. Jolicoeur, K. and Berger, D. E. (1986) Do we really know what makes educational software effective? A call for empirical research on effectiveness, Educational Technology, 26(12): 7-11.
7. Jolicoeur, K. and Berger, D. E. (1988) Implementing educational software and evaluating its academic effectiveness: Part I, Educational Technology, 28(9): 7-13.
8. Krueger, R. A. (1994) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, Sage, London.
9. McDougall, A. and Squires, D. (1995) A critical examination of the checklist approach in software selection, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(3): 263-74.
10. Nardi, B. (1996) Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Nesbit, J. et al. (2002) Communities for learning object evaluation, Paper presented at the Presentation to the Educational Technology User Group Fall Workshop, 21 November, Richmond, BC, ETUG.
12. Neuman, D. (1989) Naturalistic inquiry and computer-based instruction: Rationale, procedures, and potential, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 37(3): 39-51.
13. Patton, M. Q. (1980) Qualitative evaluation methods, Sage, Beverly Hills.
14. Patton, M. Q. (1982) Practical evaluation, Sage, Beverly Hills.
15. Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, Simon and Schuster, New York.
16. Reiser, R. A. and Dick, W. (1990) Evaluating instructional software, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 38(3): 43-50.
17. Resnick, P. and Zeckhauser, R. (2002) Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. The economics of the Internet and e-commerce, in Advances in applied microeconomics fl, ed. M. R. Baye, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
18. Shrout, P. E. and Fleiss, J. L. (1979) Intraclass correlations, Psychological Bulletin, 86: 420-28.
19. Vargo, J. et al. (2003) LO evaluation: Computer mediated collaboration and interrater reliability, International Journal of Computers and Application, 25(5).
20. Williams, D. D. (2000) (accessed 18 April 2002) Evaluation of learning objects and instruction using learning objects, (Online) http://reusability.org/read/chapters/williams.doc.
21. Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R. and Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997) Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines, Longman, New York.