Evaluation guidelines for multimedia courseware

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 2-17

  Gibbs, William ^a   Graves, Pat R ^a   Bernas, Ronan S ^a  

^a EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer based instruction; Courseware selection criteria; Evaluation guidelines; Hypermedia; Instructional software; Multimedia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84255206491     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2001.10782329     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bovée, C. L., & Thill, J. V (2000). Business communication today. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Chang, L. L., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (1987). An evaluation system for educational software: A self-instructional approach. Educational Technology 27(6), 15-19.
3. Dudley-Marling, C., & Owston, R. D. (1987). The state of educational software: A criterion-based evaluation. Educational Technology, 27(3), 25-29.
4. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Gros, B., & Spector, M. (1994). Evaluating automated instructional design systems: A complex problem. Educational Technology, 34(5), 37-46.
6. Hannafin, M. J., & Peck, K. L. (1988). The design development and evaluation of instructional software. New York: Macmillan.
7. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1996).1nstructional media and technologies for learning. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
8. Heller, R. S. (1991). Evaluating software: A review of the options. Computer Educator, 17(4), 285-291.
9. Jolicoeur, K., & Berger, D. E. (1986). Do we really know what makes educational software effective? A call for empirical research on effectiveness. Educational Technology, 26(12), 7-11.
10. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
11. Le Maistre, C. (1998). What is an expert instructional designer? Evidence of expert performance during formative evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 21-36.
12. Morrison, G. D., Lowther, D. L., & DeMeulle, L. (1999). Integrating computer technology into the classroom. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
13. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem-solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc
14. Oswalt, B. J. (1982). Identification of competencies necesstuy for computer literacy and determination of emphasis placed on each compe:ency in introduction to data processing courses offered at the high school level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis, TN.
15. Roblyer, M.D. (1988). Fundamental problems and principle of designing effective courseware. In D. J. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional design of microcomputer courseware (pp. 7-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Roblyer, M.D., Edwards, J., & Havriluk, M.A. (1997). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Columbus, OH: MerrilL
17. Sapre, P.M. (1990). Research methods in business education. Little Rock, AR: Delta Pi Epsilon.
18. Schueckler, L. M., & Shuell, T. J. (1989). A comparison of software evaluation forms and reviews. journal of Educational Computer Research, 5(1), 17-33.
19. Shuell, T. J., & Schueckler, L. M. (1989). Toward evaluating software according to principles of learning and teaching. journal of Educational Computer Research, 5(2), 135-149.
20. Smeltzer, L. R., & Leonard, D. J. (1994). Managerial communication. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
21. Tolhurst, D. (1995). Hypertext, hypermedia, multimedia defined? Educational Technology, 35(2), 21-26.
22. Zahner, J. E., Reiser, R. A., Dick, W, & Gill, B. (1992). Evaluating instructional software: A simplified model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 55-62.