Aspectual Shifts: Grammatical and Pragmatic Knowledge in L2 Acquisition

The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 455-483

  Slabakova, Roumyana ^a   Montrul, Silvina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144442420     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315085340-16     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Avrutin, S. (1999). Development of the syntax-discourse interface. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
2. Avrutin, S., and Wexler, K. (1992). Development of principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and coreference. Language Acquisition, 4, 259-306.
3. Avrutin, S., and Wexler, K. (1999-2000). Children’s knowledge of subjunctive clauses: Obviation, binding, and reference. Language Acquisition, 8(1), 69-102.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, and A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 41-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999a). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49 (4), 677-713.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999b). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 341-382.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Language Learning, 50 (Suppl. 1), xi-491.
8. Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass and J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41-68). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
9. Borer, H. (1994). The projection of arguments. UMass Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 17, 19-47.
10. Bruhn de Garavito, J. (1999). The se constructions in Spanish near-native competence. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 247-296.
11. Chien, Y., and Wexler, K. (1990). Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1, 225-295.
12. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Chomsky, N. (1972). Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
14. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Chung, S., and Timberlake, A. (1985). Tense, aspect, and mood. In T. Schopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp. 202-258). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
16. Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
17. Dahl, Ö. (1984). Temporal distance: Remoteness distinctions in tense-aspect systems. In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, and Ö. Dahl (Eds.), Explanations for language universals (pp. 105-122). Berlin: Mouton.
18. de Swart, H. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16(2), 347-385.
19. Fernández Lagunilla, M., and Miguel, E. de (1999). Relaciones entre el léxico y la sintaxis: adverbios de foco y delimitadores aspectuales. Verba, 26, 97-128.
20. Giorgi, A., and Pianesi, F. (1997). Tense and aspect: from semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
21. Godfrey, D.L. (1980). A discourse analysis of tense in adult ESL monologues. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 92-110). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
22. Grinstead, J. (2004). Subjects and interface delay in child Spanish and Catalan. Language, 80, 40-72.
23. Grodzinsky, Y., and Reinhart, T. (1993). The innateness of binding and the development of coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 69-103.
24. Hopper, P. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax (pp. 213-241). New York: Academic Press.
25. Juffs, A., and Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in L2 sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483-516.
26. Krämer, I. (2000). Interpreting indefinites: An experimental study of children’s language comprehension. MP1 Series in Psycholinguistics, 15. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
27. Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
28. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
29. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
30. Longacre, R. (1981). A spectrum and profile approach to discourse analysis. Text, 1, 337-359.
31. McDaniel, D., Cairns, H. S., and Hsu, J. R. (1990). Binding principles in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition, 1, 121-139.
32. Meisel, J. (1997). The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 227-263.
33. Miguel, E. de (1999). El aspecto léxico. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (Vol. 2, pp. 2977-3060). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
34. Montrul, S. (1999). Se o no se: A look at transitive and intransitive verbs. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3 (2), 145-194.
35. Montrul, S., and Rodríguez Louro, C. (2006). Beyond the syntax of the null subject parameter: A look at the discourse pragmatic distribution of null and overt subjects by L2 learners of Spanish. In V. Torrens and L. Escobar (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages (pp. 401-418). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Montrul, S., and Slabakova, R. (2001). Is native-like competence possible in L2 acquisition? In A. H.-J. Do, L. Domínguez, and A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 522-533). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
37. Montrul, S., and Slabakova, R. (2002). Acquiring morphosyntactic and semantic properties of preterite and imperfect tenses in L2 Spanish. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and J. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1-L2 connection (pp. 113-149). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
38. Montrul, S., and Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: an investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25 (3), 165-196.
39. Nishida, C. (1994). The Spanish refelxive clitic se as an aspectual class marker. Linguistics, 32 (3), 425-458.
40. Olsen, M. B. (1997). A semantic and pragmatic model of lexical and grammatical aspect. New York: Garland.
41. Piñango, M., Zurif, E., and Jackendoff, R. (1999). Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28 (4), 395-414.
42. Reuland, E. (2001). Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 32 (3), 439-492.
43. Sanz, M. (2000). Events and predication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Schwartz, B., and Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access hypothesis. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72.
45. Schmitt, C. (1996). Aspect and the syntax of noun phrases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.
46. Slabakova, R. (2001). Telicity in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Slabakova, R., and Montrul, S. (2002). On the semantics of viewpoint aspect and its L2 acquisition. In Y. Shirai and R. Salaberry (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 363-396). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
49. Toth, P. (1999). Preemption in instructed learners of Spanish as a foreign language: Acquiring a rule for SE. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 195-146.
50. Travis, L. (1992). Inner aspect and the structure of VP. Cahiers Linguistiques de l’UQAM, 1, 130-146.
51. van Hout, A. (1998a). Event semantics of verb phrase alternations: A case study of Dutch and its acquisition. New York: Garland.
52. van Hout, A. (1998b). On the role of direct objects and particles in learning telicity in Dutch and English. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, and H. Walsh, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 397-408). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
53. Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
54. Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.
55. Wagner, L. (1999). Acquiring tense in form and meaning. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, and C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 708-719). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
56. Zagona, K. (1996). Compositionality of aspect: Evidence from Spanish aspectual se. In C. Parodi, C. Quicoli, M. Saltarelli, and M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Aspects of Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV (pp. 475-488). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.