The Verbal Functional Domain in L2A and L3A: Tense and Agreement in Cantonese-English- French Interlanguage

The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 378-403

  Leung, Yan Kit Ingrid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144442248     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315085340-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Beck, M.-L. (1997). Regular verbs, past tense and frequency: Tracking down a potential source of NS/NNS competence differences. Second Language Research, 13, 93-115.
3. Beck, M.-L. (1998). L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 311-348.
4. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bruhn de Garavito, J., and White, L. (2002). The second language acquisition of Spanish DPs: The status of grammatical features. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux and J. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection (pp. 151-176). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
6. Cheng, L.L.-S. (1997). On the typology of wh-questions. New York: Garland.
7. Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Clahsen, H., Penke, M., and Parodi, T. (1993-1994). Functional categories in early child German. Language Acquisition, 3, 395-429.
11. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit vs. explicit learning. In C. Doughty and M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
12. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Ernst, T. (1994). Functional categories and the Chinese Infl. Linguistics, 32, 191-212.
14. Eubank, L. (1993-1994). On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition, 3, 183-208.
15. Eubank, L. (1994). Optionality and the initial state in L2 development. In T. Hoekstra and B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 369-388). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Flynn, S., Foley, C, and Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. The International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3-16.
17. Fukui, N., and Speas, M. (1986). Specifiers and projections. MIT Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 8, 128-172.
18. Gu, Y. (1994). Aspect licensing, verb movement and feature checking. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Oriéntale, 24, 49-83.
19. Hammarberg, B. (2001). Roles of LI and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, and U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 21-41). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
20. Hawkins, R. (1998). The inaccessibility of formal features of functional categories in second language acquisition. Paper presented at PacSLRF’98, Tokyo, Japan.
21. Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
22. Hawkins, R., and Chan, C.Y.-h. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The “failed functional features hypothesis.” Second Language Research, 13, 187-226.
23. Hawkins, R., and Liszka, S. (2003). Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, and R. Towell (Eds.), The lexicon-syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 21-44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Herschensohn, J. (1998). Minimally raising the verb issue. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, and H. Walsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Boston University Annual Conference on Language Development (pp. 325-336). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
25. Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 347-386.
26. Hu, J., Pan, H., and Xu, L. (2001). Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics, 39, 1117-1148.
27. Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 75, 321-337.
28. Ionin, T., and Wexler, K. (2002). Optional verb raising in L2 acquisition: Evidence from LI-Russian learners of English. In J. Costa and M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA 2001 Conference on Language Acquisition (pp. 134-141). Lisbon: Associacao Portuguesa de Linguistica.
29. Kellerman, E. (1979). Transfer and non-transfer: where we are now. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 31-51.
30. Kellerman, E. (1983). “Now you see it, now you don’t.” In S. Gass and L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 112-134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Klein, E. (1995). Second vs. third language acquisition: is there a difference? Language Learning, 45, 419-465.
32. Lardiere, D. (1998a). Case and tense in fossilized steady state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 1-26.
33. Lardiere, D. (1998b). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359-375.
34. Leung, Y.-k.I. (1998). Transfer between interlanguages. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, and H. Walsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 477-487). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
35. Leung, Y.-k. I. (2002). Functional categories in second and third language acquisition: A cross-linguistic study of the acquisition of English and French by Chinese and Vietnamese speakers. PhD dissertation, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. Distributed by McGill Working Papers in Linguistics: www.arts.mcgill.ca/programs/linguistics/mcgwpl/index.htm
36. Leung, Y.-k.I. (2003). Failed features versus full transfer full access in the acquisition of a third language: Evidence from tense and agreement. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, and H. Goodluck (Eds.), L2 Links: Proceedings of the 2002 Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Available online: http://www.lingref.eom/cpp/gasla/6/
37. Leung, Y.-k.I. (2005a). L2 vs. L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1), 39-61.
38. Leung, Y.-k. I. (2005b). Second vs. third language acquisition of tense and agreement in French by Vietnamese monolinguals and Cantonese-English bilinguals. In J. Cohen, K. McAlister, K. Rolstad, and J. MacSwan (Eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (pp. 1344-1352). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
39. Liceras, J. M., Diaz, L., and Maxwell, D. (1999). Null subjects in non-native grammars: The Spanish L2 of Chinese, English, French, German, Japanese and Korean speakers. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 109-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. Lozano, C. (2002). Universal grammar and focus constraints: The acquisition of pronouns and word order in non-native Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Essex.
41. Marantz, A. (1995). The minimalist program. In G. Webelhuth (Ed.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program (pp. 351-382). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
42. Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence. In C. Doughty and M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436-486). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
43. Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365-424.
44. Ringbom, H. (1986). Crosslinguistic influence and the foreign language process. In E. Kellerman and M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Crosslinguistc influence in second language acquisition (pp. 150-162). New York: Pergamon Press.
45. Robertson, D., and Sorace, A. (1999). Losing the V2 constraint. In E. Klein and G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 317-361). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
46. Rohrbacher, B. (1999). Morphology-driven syntax: A theory of V to I raising and pro-drop. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Schwartz, B. D., and Sprouse, R. (1994). Word order and nominative case in non-native language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (LI Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317-368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Schwartz, B. D., and Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72.
49. Sjogren, Y. (2001). About preference for V3 instead ofV2 in L3: A study of word-order in third language acquisition. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Third Language Acquisition and Trilingualism, Fryske Akademy, Ljouwert/Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
50. Smith, N., and Tsimpli, I. M. (1995). The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
51. Thrainsson, H. (1996). On the (non-)universality of functional categories. In W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thrainsson, and C. Zwart (Eds.), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework (pp. 253-281). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Vainikka, A., and Young-Scholten, M. (1994). Direct access to X’-theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 265-316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53. Vainikka, A., and Young-Scholten, M. (1996). Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12, 7-39.
54. White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
55. White, L. (1991a). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
56. White, L. (1991b). The verb-movement parameter in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 1, 337-360.
57. White, L. (1992). Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 273-286.
58. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., and Leung, Y.-k.I. (2004). Gender agreement in L2 Spanish: Evidence against failed features. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 105-133.
60. Yuan, B. (2001). The status of thematic verbs in the second language acquisition of Chinese: Against inevitability of thematic verb-raising in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17, 248-272.
61. Yuan, B. (2004). Negation in French-Chinese, German-Chinese and English-Chinese interlanguages. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 169-197.
62. Zobl, H. (1992). Prior linguistic knowledge and the conservatism of the learning procedure: Grammaticality judgements of unilingual and multilingual learners. In S. Gass and L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (rev. ed., pp. 177-196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.