What are real SPARQL queries like?

Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Web Information Management, SWIM 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Picalausa, Francois ^a   Vansummeren, Stijn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

acyclicity; conjunctive queries; log analysis; SPARQL

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; QUERY LANGUAGES;

ACYCLICITY; CONJUNCTIVE OPERATOR; CONJUNCTIVE QUERY; DBPEDIA; LOG ANALYSIS; QUERY EVALUATION; QUERY PROCESSING ENGINE; REAL-WORLD; SPARQL; SYNTACTICAL STRUCTURES;

QUERY PROCESSING;

EID: 85143178153     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1999299.1999306     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. D. J. Abadi, A. Marcus, S. Madden, and K. J. Hollenbach. Scalable semantic web data management using vertical partitioning. In Proceedings of VLDB 2007, pages 411-422. ACM, 2007.
2. S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
3. M. Arias, J. D. Fernández, M. A. Martínez-Prieto, and P. de la Fuente. An empirical study of real-world sparql queries. CoRR, abs/1103.5043, 2011.
4. E. I. Chong, S. Das, G. Eadon, and J. Srinivasan. An efficient SQL-based RDF querying scheme. In Proceedings of VLDB 2005, pages 1216-1227, 2005.
5. G. H. L. Fletcher and P. W. Beck. Scalable indexing of RDF graphs for efficient join processing. In D. W.-L. Cheung, I.-Y. Song, W. W. Chu, X. Hu, and J. J. Lin, editors, CIKM, pages 1513-1516. ACM, 2009.
6. G. Gottlob, N. Leone, and F. Scarcello. The complexity of acyclic conjunctive queries. J. ACM, 48(3):431-498, 2001.
7. K. Möller, M. Hausenblas, R. Cyganiak, S. Handschuh, and G. Grimnes. Learning from linked open data usage: Patterns & metrics. In Proceedings of the Web Science Conference 2010, 2010.
8. T. Neumann and G. Weikum. Scalable join processing on very large RDF graphs. In SIGMOD 2009 Conference Proceedings, pages 627-640, 2009.
9. T. Neumann and G. Weikum. The RDF-3X engine for scalable management of RDF data. VLDB J., 19(1):91-113, 2010.
10. J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 34(3), 2009.
11. A. Polleres. From SPARQL to rules (and back). In WWW 2007 Conference Proceedings, pages 787-796.
12. E. Prud'hommeaux and A. Seaborne. SPARQL query language for RDF. Technical report, W3C Recommendation, 2008.
13. Resource description framework( (RDF). Technical report, W3C. http://www.w3.org/RDF/.
14. M. Schmidt, M. Meier, and G. Lausen. Foundations of SPARQL query optimization. In ICDT 2010 Proceedings, pages 4-33, 2010.
15. L. Sidirourgos, R. Goncalves, M. L. Kersten, N. Nes, and S. Manegold. Column-store support for RDF data management: not all swans are white. PVLDB, 1(2):1553-1563, 2008.
16. M. Y. Vardi. The complexity of relational query languages (extended abstract). In STOC, pages 137-146. ACM, 1982.
17. M.-E. Vidal, E. Ruckhaus, T. Lampo, A. Martínez, J. Sierra, and A. Polleres. Efficiently joining group patterns in SPARQL queries. In 7th Extended Semantic Web Conference, volume 6088 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 228-242. Springer, 2010.
18. W3C SWEO Community Project. Linking open data. http://www.w3.org/wiki/ SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData.
19. C. Weiss, P. Karras, and A. Bernstein. Hexastore: sextuple indexing for semantic web data management. PVLDB, 1(1):1008-1019, 2008.