Foundations of SPARQL query optimization

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 4-33

  Schmidt, Michael ^a   Meier, Michael ^a   Lausen, Georg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

complexity; query optimization; RDF; semantic query optimization; SPARQL; SPARQL algebra

Indexed keywords

CHASE ALGORITHM; COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS; EVALUATION PROBLEMS; QUERY OPTIMIZATION; RELATIONAL ALGEBRA; REWRITING RULES; SEMANTIC QUERY OPTIMIZATIONS; SET SEMANTICS;

ALGEBRA; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; OPTIMIZATION; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS;

QUERY LANGUAGES;

EID: 77954493935     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1804669.1804675     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. R. Angles and C. Gutierrez. The Expressive Power of SPARQL. In ISWC, pages 114-129, 2008.
2. C. Beeri and M. Y. Vardi. A Proof Procedure for Data Dependencies. J. ACM, 31(4):718-741, 1984.
3. C. Weiss et al. Hexastore: Sextuple Indexing for Semantic Web Data Management. In VLDB, pages 1008-1019, 2008.
4. U. S. Chakravarthy, J. Grant, and J. Minker. Logic-based Approach to Semantic Query Optimization. TODS, 15(2):162-207, 1990.
5. R. Cyganiac. A relational algebra for SPARQL. Technical report, HP Laboratories Bristol, 2005.
6. D. J. Abadi et al. Scalable Semantic Web Data Management Using Vertical Partitioning. In VLDB, pages 411-422, 2007.
7. A. Deutsch, A. Nash, and J. Remmel. The Chase Revisited. In PODS, pages 149-158, 2008.
8. A. Deutsch, L. Popa, and V. Tannen. Query Reformulation with Constraints. SIGMOD Record, 35(1):65-73, 2006.
9. E. I. Chong et al. An Efficient SQL-based RDF Querying Scheme. In VLDB, pages 1216-1227, 2005.
10. François Bry et al. Foundations of Rule-based Query Answering. In Reasoning Web, pages 1-153, 2007.
11. G. Serfiotis et al. Containment and Minimization of RDF/S Query Patterns. In ISWC, pages 607-623, 2005.
12. C. Gutierrez, C. A. Hurtado, and A. O. Mendelzon. Foundations of Semantic Web Databases. In PODS, pages 95-106, 2004.
13. A. Harth and S. Decker. Optimized Index Structures for Querying RDF from the Web. In LA-WEB, pages 71-80, 2005.
14. D. S. Johnson and A. Klug. Testing Containment of Conjunctive Queries under Functional and Inclusion Dependencies. In PODS, pages 164-169, 1982.
15. J. J. King. QUIST: a system for semantic query optimization in relational databases. In VLDB, pages 510-517, 1981.
16. L. Sidirourgos et al. Column-store Support for RDF Data Management: not all swans are white. In VLDB, page 1553, 2008.
17. G. Lausen, M. Meier, and M. Schmidt. SPARQLing Constraints for RDF. In EDBT, pages 499-509, 2008.
18. Linked Data. http://linkeddata.org/.
19. M. Schmidt et al. An Experimental Comparison of RDF Data Management Approaches in a SPARQL Benchmark Scenario. In ISWC, pages 82-97, 2008.
20. M. Stocker et al. SPARQL Basic Graph Pattern Optimization Using Selectivity Estimation. In WWW, pages 595-604, 2008.
21. D. Maier, A. Mendelzon, and Y. Sagiv. Testing Implications of Data Dependencies. In SIGMOD, pages 152-152, 1979.
22. M. Meier, M. Schmidt, and G. Lausen. On Chase Termination Beyond Stratification. In VLDB, 2009.
23. T. Neumann and G. Weikum. RDF-3X: a RISC-style engine for RDF. PVLDB, 1(1):647-659, 2008.
24. J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL. Technical report, arXiv:0605124 cs.DB, 2006.
25. J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics of SPARQL, 2006. TR/DCC-2006-16, Universidad de Chile.
26. J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez. Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 34(3), 2009.
27. A. Polleres. From SPARQL to Rules (and back). In WWW, pages 787-796, 2007.
28. R. Fagin et al. Data Exchange: Semantics and Query Answering. Theor. Comput. Sci., 336(1):89-124, 2005.
29. Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF/.
30. S. Alexaki et al. On Storing Voluminous RDF descriptions: The case of Web Portal Catalogs. In WebDB, pages 43-48, 2001.
31. J. Smith and P. Chang. Optimizing the Performance of a Relational Algebra Database Interface. Commun. ACM, 18(10):568-579, 1975.
32. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recommendation, 15 Januray 2008.
33. L. J. Stockmeyer. The polynomial-time hierarchy. Theor. Comput. Sci., 3:1-22, 1976.
34. Y. Theoharis et al. Benchmarking Database Representations of RDF/S Stores. In ISWC, pages 685-701, 2005.