Beyond Rhetoric: Realities and Complexities of Integrating Assessment into Classroom Teaching and Learning

The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 7-52

  Pellegrino, James W ^a   Goldman, Susan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142811623     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315086545-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Ball, D. L. (2003). Mathematical proficiency for all students. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
4. Bell, M., Bell, J., Bretzlauf, J., Dillard, A., Hartfield, R., Isaacs, A., et al. (2004). Everyday mathematics. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
5. Billstein, R., Williamson, J., Montoya, P., Lowery, J., Williams, D., Buck, M., et al. (1999). Middle grades maththematics. Evanston, IL: McDou-gal Littell.
6. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Assessment for learning-putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-73.
8. Chambers-Boucher, L. M., Colligan, E., Gartzman, M., Inzerillo, C., Kelso, C. R., Marsh, G. E., et al. (2003). Math trailblazers (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.
9. Commission on Instructionally Supportive Assessment. (2001). Building tests to support instruction and accountability: A guide for policymakers. Report commissioned by NEA, NAESP, NASSP, NMSP, & AASA. Retrieved October 3, 2005, from http://www.nea.org/accountability/buildingtests.html
10. Donovan, S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2004). Learning and instruction: A SERP research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Hickey, D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2005). Theory, level, and function: Three dimensions for understanding transfer and student assessment. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. (pp. 251-293) Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
12. Illinois State Board of Education. (1997, July). Illinois learning standards. Retrieved October 3, 2005, from http://www.isbe.state.il.us/ils/Default.htm
13. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
14. Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (1998). Connected mathematics. Glenview, IL: Dale Seymour Publications.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
18. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2003). Assessment in support of learning and instruction: Bridging the gap between large-scale and classroom assessment. Committee on Assessment in Support of Learning and Instruction, Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Pellegrino, J. W., Baxter, G. P., & Glaser, R. (1999). Addressing the "two disciplines" problem: Linking theories of cognition and learning with assessment and instructional practice. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education, 24, 307-353. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
21. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2004). The assessment resources available within the four standards-based K-8 mathematics curricula of the CMSI: A review, analysis and critique. (Technical Report, Chicago Public Schools, Center for the Study of Learning, Instruction, and Teacher Development). Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
23. Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Frameworks and methods for analyzing the assessment resources available within the four stan-dards-based K-8 mathematics curricula of the CMSI. (Technical Report, Chicago Public Schools, Center for the Study of Learning, Instruction, and Teacher Development). Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
24. Roberts, L., & Wilson, M. (1998a, January). Evaluating the effects of an integrated assessment system on science teachers' assessment perceptions and practice. (BEAR Research Report Series, SA-98-1). Berkeley: University of California. Retrieved October 3, 2005, from http://bear.berkeley.edu/pub.html
25. Roberts, L., & Wilson, M. (1998b, February). An integrated assessment system as a medium for teacher change and the organizational factors that mediate science teachers' professional development. (BEAR Report Series, SA-98-2.). Berkeley: University of California. Retrieved October 3, 2005, from http://bear.berkeley.edu/pub.html
26. Roberts, L., Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (1997, June). The SEPUP assessment system: An overview. (BEAR Report Series, SA-97-1). Berkeley: University of California. Retrieved October 3, 2005, from http://bear.berkeley.edu/pub.html
27. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shavelson, R. J., Hamilton, L., & Klein, S. (2002). On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 369-393.
28. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
29. Sloane, K., Wilson, M., & Samson, S. (1996). Designing an embedded assessment system: From principles to practice. (BEAR Report Series, SA-96-1). Berkeley: University of California. Retrieved October 3, 2005, from http://bear.berkeley.edu/pub.html
30. Stiggins, R. J. (1997). Student-centered classroom assessment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Stiggins, R. (2001). the unfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20, 5-15.
32. Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: the absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765.
33. Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. (Research Monograph No. 6). Washington, DC: National Institute for Science Education and Council of Chief State School Officers.
34. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Wilson, M., & Bertenthal, M. (2005). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), 181-208.