AFFECT IN MATHEMATICAL THINKING AND LEARNING: Towards Integration Of Emotion, Motivation, and Cognition

New Mathematics Education Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 209-232

  Hannula, Markku S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b TALLINN UNIVERSITY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85141556218     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789087903510_019     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Boaler, J. (1997). Reclaiming school mathematics: The girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9, 285-305.
2. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457.
3. Boekaerts, M. (2002). The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students’ context sensitivity. In P. R. Pintrich and M. L. Maehr (Eds.) Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Vol. 12, New directions in measures and methods. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 77-120.
4. Boekaerts, M., and Niemivirta, M. (2000) Self-regulated learning: Finding a balance between learning goals and ego-protective goals. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 417-450.
5. Brown, L. and Reid, D. A. (In print). Embodied cognition: Somatic markers, purposes and emotional orientations. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
6. Buck, R. (1999). The biological affects: A typology. Psychological Review, 106 (2), 301-336.
7. Carlson, M. P. (2000). A study of the mathematical behaviours of mathematicians: The role of metacognition and mathematical intimacy in solving problems. In. T. Nakahara and M. Koyama (Eds.) Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2). Japan: Hiroshima University, 137-144.
8. Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E. and Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 145-152.
9. Covington, M. V. and Dray, E. (2002). The developmental course of Achievement motivation: A needbased approach. In A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles (Eds.) Development of achievement motivation. London: Academic Press, 33-56.
10. Dai, D. Y. (2004). Epiloque: Putting it all together: Some concluding thoughts. In D. Y. Dai and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.) Motivation, emotion, and cognition; Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 419-431.
11. Dai, D. Y. and Sternberg, R. J. (2004). (Eds.) Motivation, emotion, and cognition; Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Damasio, A. R. (1995). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. London: Avon Books.
13. DeBellis V. A. and Goldin, G. A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem-solving. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.) Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 26. Lahti, Finland, 209-221.
14. DeBellis V. A. and Goldin, G. A (In print). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
15. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln. (Eds). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1-29.
16. DiMartino, P.and Zan, R. (2001). Attitude towards mathematics, some theoretical issues. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.) Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3. Utrecht, The Netherlands, 351-358.
17. Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles (Eds.) Development of achievement motivation. London: Academic Press, 57-88.
18. Dweck, C. S., Mangels, J. A. and Good, C. (2004). Motivational effects on attention, cognition, and performance. In D. Y. Dai and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.) Motivation, emotion, and cognition; Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 41-56.
19. Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed. New York: Henry Holt.
20. Elfenbein, H. A., and Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203-235.
21. Evans, J. (2000). Adults’ mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practices. London:Routledge Falmer.
22. Furinghetti, F., and Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In. G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen and G. Törner (Eds.) Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 39-58.
23. Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representation in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2 (3), 209-219.
24. Gottman, J. M. (1993). Studying emotion in social interaction. In M. Lewis and J. M. Haviland (Eds.) Handbook of emotions. New York: Guilford, 475-488.
25. McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualisation. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of research in mathematics education teaching and learning. New York:Macmillan, 575-596.
26. Hannula, M. (1998a). The case of Rita: “Maybe I started to like math more.” In A. Olivier and K. Newstead (Eds.) Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol 3. Stellenbosch, South Africa, 33-40.
27. Hannula, M. (1998b). Changes of beliefs and attitudes. In E. Pehkonen and G. Törner (Eds.) The state-ofart in mathematics-related belief research; Results of the MAVI activities, Research Report 184. University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education, 198-222.
28. Hannula, M. S. (2001). The metalevel of cognition-emotion interaction. In M. Ahtee, O. Björkqvist, E. Pehkonen, and V. Vatanen, (Eds.) Research on mathematics and science education. From beliefs to cognition, from problem solving to understanding. Finland: University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research, 55-65.
29. Hannula, M. S. (2002a). Attitude towards mathematics: emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25-46.
30. Hannula, M. S. (2002b). Goal regulation: needs, beliefs, and emotions. In A. D. Cockburn and E. Nardi (Eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4. Norwich, UK, 73-80.
31. Hannula, M. S. (2004a). Affect in mathematical thinking and learning. Turku, Finland: Annales universitatis Turkuensis B 273.
32. Hannula, M. S. (2004b). Regulating motivation in mathematics. A paper presented at the Topic Study Group 24 of ICME-10 conference. Retrieved September 15th 2005 at http://www.icmeorganisers. dk/tsg24/Documents/Hannula.doc
33. Hannula. M. (2005). A case study of two students’ belief systems and goal systems in a conflict over teaching methods. In C. Bergsten and B. Grevholm (Eds.) Conceptions of mathematics. Proceedings of Norma 01. Third Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education. Linköping: SMDFs Skriftserie, 140-147.
34. Hannula, M.S., Maijala, H., and Pehkonen, E. (2004). Development of understanding and self-confidence in mathematics; grades 5-8. In M. J. Høines and A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol 3. Bergen University College, 17-24.
35. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33-46.
36. Isoda, M. and Nagagoshi, A. (2000). A case study of a student emotional change using changing heart rate in problem posing and solving Japanese classroom in mathematics. In T. Nakahara and M Koyama (Eds.) Proceedings of the 24th conference of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol 3. Hiroshima, Japan, 87-94.
37. Izard, C. E. (1983, revised). The maximally discriminative facial movement coding system. Newark:University of Delaware, Instructional Resources Center.
38. Kaasila, R., Hannula, M. S., Laine, A. and Pehkonen, E. (2005). Autobiograpical narratives, identity and view of mathematics. In Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education 17.-21.2. 2005 in Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain. Retrieved 3.11.2005 at http://cerme4.crm.es/Papers%20definitius/2/wg2listofpapers.htm
39. Kloosterman, P. (2002). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning in the secondary school:Measurement and implications for motivation. In. G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen and G. Törner (Eds.) Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht, The Neatherlands: Kluwer, 247-269.
40. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
41. Leder, G. (1995). Equity inside the mathematics classroom: Fact or artifact? In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema and L. B. Adaijan (Eds.) New directions for equity in mathematics education. Cambridge:University Press.
42. LeDoux, J. (1998). The Emotional Brain. London: Phoenix/Orion.
43. Lemos, M. S. (1999). Students’ goals and self-regulation in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Researc, 31, 471-486.
44. Lincoln Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. (Eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 163-188.
45. Linnanmäki, K. (2002). Matematikprestationer och självuppfattning, en uppföljninggsstudie I relation till skolspråk och kön. [Mathematical proficiency and self-concept; a longitudinal study with an attention to language and gender]. Turku: Åbo Akademi University Press.
46. Liljedahl, P. (2005). Sustained engagement: Preservice teachers’ experience with a chain of discovery. In Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education 17.-21.2. 2005 in Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Spain. Retrieved 3.11.2005 at http://cerme4.crm.es/Papers%20definitius/2/wg2listofpapers.htm
47. Linnenbrink E. A. and Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fostering adaptive motivation, affect, and cognition. In C. Sansone and J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. New York: Academic Press, 195-227.
48. Linnenbrink, E. A. and Pintrich, P. R. (2004). Role of affect in cognitive processing in academic contexts. In D. Y. Dai and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.) Motivation, emotion, and cognition; Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 57-88.
49. Ma, X. and Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analyses. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47.
50. Mandler, G. (1989). Affect and learning: Causes and consequences of emotional interactions. In D. B. McLeod and V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag, 3-19.
51. McLeod, D.B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D.A.Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching, 575-596. New York: MacMillan.
52. Meyer, D. K. and Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist 37 (2), 107-114.
53. Murphy, P. K. and Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3-53.
54. Nuttin, J. (1984). Motivation, planning, and action: A relational theory of behavior dynamic. Leuven University Press.
55. Op’t Eynde P., De Corte, E. and Verschaffel, L. (In print). Accepting emotional complexity: A socioconstructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
56. Op’t Eynde, P. and Hannula, M. S. (In print). The case study of Frank. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
57. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., and Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions and students’ self regulated learning and achievement: A program for qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37 (2), 91-105.
58. Philippou, G, and Christou, C. (2002). A study of the mathematics teaching, Efficacy beliefs of Primary Teachers. In. G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen and G. Törner (Eds.) Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 211-232.
59. Polkinghorne, D. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In J. Hatch and R. Wisniewski (Eds.) Life history and narrative. London: Falmer Press, 5-23.
60. Popper, K. R. and Ecceles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer International.
61. Power, M. and Dalgleish, T. (1997). Cognition and emotion: From order to disorder. UK: Psychology Press.
62. Reid, D.A. (1996). Enactivism as a methodology. In L. Puig and A Gutiérrez, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4. Valencia, Spain, 203-210.
63. Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000). When rewards compete with nature: The undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In C. Sansone and J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. New York: Academic Press, 13-55.
64. Salovey, P. and Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185-211.
65. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.
66. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4 (1), 1-94.
67. Schwarz, N. and Skrunik, I. (2003). Feeling and thinking: Implications for problem solving. In J. E. Davidson and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). The psychology of problem solving. Cambridge, UK: University Press, 263-290.
68. Shah, J. Y. and Kruglanski, A. W. (2000). The structure and substance of intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone and J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. New York: Academic Press, 105-129.
69. Vermeer, H. J. (1997). Sixth-grade students’ mathematical problem solving behavior: Motivational variables and gender differences. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.
70. Vinner, S. (2000). Mathematics education-Procedures, rituals and man’s search for meaning. In ICME 9, Abstracts of plenary lectures and regular lectures, July 31-August 6, 2000. Tokyo/Makuhari, Japan, 120-121.
71. Yakel, E. and Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27 (4), 458-477.
72. Zan, R., Brown. L., Evans, J. and Hannula, M. S. (In print). Affect in mathematics education: an introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
73. Zimmerman, B. J. and Campillio, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. I J. E. Davidson and R. J. Sternberg (Es.) The psychology of problem solving. UK: Cambridge University Press, 233-262.
74. Zimmerman, B. J. and Schunk, D.H. (2004). Self-regulating intellectual processes and outcomes: A social cognitive perspective. In D. Y. Dai and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.) Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum, 323-350.