메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 29-52

What is research misconduct?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 85139684896     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780429073328-3     Document Type: Chapter
Times cited : (8)

References (35)
  • 2
    • 0033519913 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries
    • Nylenna M, Andersen, D, Dahlquist G et al. Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries. National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries. Lancet 1999; 354: 57-61.
    • (1999) Lancet , vol.354 , pp. 57-61
    • Nylenna, M.1    Andersen, D.2    Dahlquist, G.3
  • 5
    • 84859264173 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • London: The UK Research Integrity Office
    • The UK Panel for Research Integrity in Health and Biomedical Sciences (UKRIO). Code of Practice for Research. London: The UK Research Integrity Office, 2008.
    • (2008) Code of Practice for Research.
  • 6
    • 0003492165 scopus 로고
    • Washington, DC: National Academy Press
    • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. Volumes 1 and 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992/93.
    • (1992) Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. , vol.1-2
  • 7
    • 0346234012 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rethinking unscientific attitudes about scientific misconduct
    • March 28
    • Gunsalus CK. Rethinking unscientific attitudes about scientific misconduct. Chron HighEduc, March 28, 1997, B4.
    • (1997) Chron HighEduc , pp. B4
    • Gunsalus, C.K.1
  • 8
    • 33645957658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case
    • Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 609-13.
    • (2006) Ann Intern Med , vol.144 , pp. 609-613
    • Sox, H.C.1    Rennie, D.2
  • 9
  • 10
    • 23244467751 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct
    • Smith J, Godlee F. Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct. BMJ 2005; 331: 245-6.
    • (2005) BMJ , vol.331 , pp. 245-246
    • Smith, J.1    Godlee, F.2
  • 11
    • 23244440502 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Suspected research fraud: Difficulties of getting at the truth
    • White C. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth. BMJ 2005; 331: 281-8.
    • (2005) BMJ , vol.331 , pp. 281-288
    • White, C.1
  • 12
    • 23244435221 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author
    • Smith R. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author. BMJ 2005; 331: 288-91.
    • (2005) BMJ , vol.331 , pp. 288-291
    • Smith, R.1
  • 13
    • 2442640517 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies
    • White C. Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies. BMJ 2004; 328: 67.
    • (2004) BMJ , vol.328 , pp. 67
    • White, C.1
  • 14
    • 33748933011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: Case of Asim Kurjak
    • Chalmers I. Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak. BMJ 2006; 333: 594-6.
    • (2006) BMJ , vol.333 , pp. 594-596
    • Chalmers, I.1
  • 15
    • 38449116617 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • University drops case against Croatian academic accused of plagiarism
    • Kmietowicz Z. University drops case against Croatian academic accused of plagiarism. BMJ 2007; 335: 1014.
    • (2007) BMJ , vol.335 , pp. 1014
    • Kmietowicz, Z.1
  • 16
    • 0027420464 scopus 로고
    • Institutional structure to ensure research integrity
    • Gunsalus CK. Institutional structure to ensure research integrity. Acad Med 1993; 68(9 Suppl): S33-8.
    • (1993) Acad Med , vol.68 , Issue.9 , pp. S33-S38
    • Gunsalus, C.K.1
  • 17
    • 0027477048 scopus 로고
    • Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office - perhaps a new leaf
    • Rennie D, Gunsalus CK. Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office - perhaps a new leaf. JAMA 1993; 269: 915-17.
    • (1993) JAMA , vol.269 , pp. 915-917
    • Rennie, D.1    Gunsalus, C.K.2
  • 18
    • 0032490184 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An American perspective on research integrity
    • Rennie D. An American perspective on research integrity. BMJ 1998; 316: 1726-8.
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.316 , pp. 1726-1728
    • Rennie, D.1
  • 20
    • 0024964947 scopus 로고
    • Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science: Final rule
    • US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science: final rule. Fed Regist 1989; 54: 32446-51.
    • (1989) Fed Regist , vol.54 , pp. 32446-32451
  • 21
    • 0027912860 scopus 로고
    • What is misconduct in science?
    • Schachman HK. What is misconduct in science? Science 1993; 261: 148-9.
    • (1993) Science , vol.261 , pp. 148-149
    • Schachman, H.K.1
  • 22
    • 85139620455 scopus 로고
    • The investigation of scientific misconduct: Some observations and suggestions
    • Mishkin B. The investigation of scientific misconduct: some observations and suggestions. New Biol 1991; 3: 8213.
    • (1991) New Biol , vol.3 , pp. 8213
    • Mishkin, B.1
  • 23
    • 11544371871 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientists are split over finding of Research Integrity Commission
    • Goodman B. Scientists are split over finding of Research Integrity Commission. Scientist 1996: 1.
    • (1996) Scientist , pp. 1
    • Goodman, B.1
  • 24
    • 0029654149 scopus 로고
    • Commission proposes new definition of misconduct
    • Kaiser J. Commission proposes new definition of misconduct. Science 1995; 269: 1811.
    • (1995) Science , vol.269 , pp. 1811
    • Kaiser, J.1
  • 27
    • 85139640188 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific misconduct in perspective: The need to improve accountability
    • Ryan KJ. Scientific misconduct in perspective: the need to improve accountability. Chron High Edue 1997; B: 1.
    • (1997) Chron High Edue , vol.B , pp. 1
    • Ryan, K.J.1
  • 28
    • 0007920180 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Federal Policy on Research Misconduct
    • Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Fed Regist 2000; 65: 76260-4.
    • (2000) Fed Regist , vol.65 , pp. 76260-76264
  • 29
    • 0012885243 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preventing the need for whistleblowing: Practical advice for university administrators
    • Gunsalus CK, Preventing the need for whistleblowing: practical advice for university administrators. Sci Eng Ethics 1998; 4: 51-64.
    • (1998) Sci Eng Ethics , vol.4 , pp. 51-64
    • Gunsalus, C.K.1
  • 30
    • 0347593385 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards
    • Gunsalus CK. How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards. Sci Eng Ethics 1998; 4: 75-94.
    • (1998) Sci Eng Ethics , vol.4 , pp. 75-94
    • Gunsalus, C.K.1
  • 31
    • 85139710043 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Threatened walkout by Spain’s matadors leaves bewilderment
    • Saturday 1 March
    • Selsky A. Threatened walkout by Spain’s matadors leaves bewilderment. Houston Chronicle Saturday 1 March, 1997: 26.
    • (1997) Houston Chronicle , pp. 26
    • Selsky, A.1
  • 33
    • 0034231395 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidelines on good publication practice
    • Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice. J Postgrad Med 2000; 46: 217-21.
    • (2000) J Postgrad Med , vol.46 , pp. 217-221
  • 34
    • 0032490348 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Deception: Difficulties and initiatives
    • Chantler C, Chantler S. Deception: difficulties and initiatives. BMJ 1998; 316: 1731-2.
    • (1998) BMJ , vol.316 , pp. 1731-1732
    • Chantler, C.1    Chantler, S.2
  • 35
    • 0034676737 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • UK’s failure to act on research misconduct
    • Farthing M, Horton R, Smith R. UK’s failure to act on research misconduct. Lancet 2000; 356: 2030.
    • (2000) Lancet , vol.356 , pp. 2030
    • Farthing, M.1    Horton, R.2    Smith, R.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.