PERCEIVING ARTICULATORY EVENTS: LESSONS FOR AN ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOACOUSTICS

Ecological Psychoacoustics

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 219-248

  Rosenblum, Lawrence D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139656670     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9780080477442_012     Document Type: Chapter

References (148)

1. Anderson, K., Carello, C & Kunkler-Peck, A. J. (May, 1996). Rotational inertia constrains perception of object length by sound. Poster presented at the North American Society for Ecological Psychology, Hartford, CT.
2. Arnold, P., & Hill, F. (2001). Bisensory augmentation: A speech reading advantage when speech is clearly audible and intact. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 339-355.
3. Ashmead, D. H., Davis, D. L., & Northington, A. (1995). Contribution of listeners' approaching motion to auditory distance perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 239-256.
4. Bermant, R I., & Welch, R B. (1976). The effect of degree of visual-auditory stimulus separation and eye position upon the spatial interaction of vision and audition. Perception and Motor Skills, 43, 487-493.
5. Bernstein, L. E., Auer, E. T. Jr., & Moore, J. K. (In press). Audiovisual speech binding: convergence or association? In G. Calvert, and C. Spence, and B. E., (Eds.), Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Bernstein, L. E., Auer, E. T., Moore, J. K., Ponton, C., Don, M., & Singh, M. (2002). Visual speech perception without primary auditory cortex activation. NeuroReport, 13, 311-315.
7. Blumstein, S., Isaacs, E., & Mertus, J. (1982). The role of gross spectral shape as a perceptual cue to place of articulation in initial stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 43-50.
8. Borin, G., De Poli, G., & Sarti, A. (1993). Algorithms and structures for synthesis using physical models. Computer Music Journal, 16, 30-42.
9. Bradlow, A. R, Nygaard, L. c., & Pisoni, D. B. (1999). Effects of talker, rate, and amplitude variation on recognition memory for spoken words. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 206-219.
10. Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. M. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219-252.
11. Buechel, C., Price, C., & Friston, K. (1998). A multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway. Nature, 394, 274-277.
12. Cabe, P., & Pittenger, J. B. (2000). Human sensitivity to acoustic infonnation from vessel filling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Peiformance, 26, 313-324.
13. Callan, D. E., Callan, A. M., Kroos, C., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (2001). Multimodal contribution to speech perception revealed by independent component analysis: A single-sweep EEG case study. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 349-353.
14. Calvert, G. A. Brammer, M. J., Bullmore, E. T., Campbell, R, Iversen, S. D., & David, A. S. (1999). Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during crossmodal binding. Neuroreport, 10, 2619-2623.
15. Calvert, G. A., Bullmore, E., Brammer, M. J., Campbell, R., Iversen, S. D., Woodruff, P., McGuire, P., Williams, S., & David, A. S. (1997). Silent lip reading activates the auditory cortex. Science, 276, 593-596.
16. Carello, C., Anderson, K. L., & Kunkler-Peck, A. J. (1998). Perception of object length by sound. Psychological Science, 9, 211-214.
17. Carello, C., Anderson, K. L., & Peck, A. (1998). Perception of object length by sound. Psychological Science, 9, 211-214.
18. Carello, C., Wagman, J. B., & Turvey, M. T. (In press). Acoustic specification of object properties. In J. Anderson and B. Anderson (Eds.), Moving image theory: Ecological considerations.Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.
19. Cohen, L. G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Faiz, L., Corwell, B., Honda, M., Sadato, H., Gerloff, C., Catala, M. D., & Hallett, M. (1997). Functional relevance of crossmodal plasticity in the blind. Nature, 389, 180-182.
20. Corballis, M. C. (2002). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Clark, B., & Graybiel, A. (1966). Influence of Contact Cues on the Perception of the Oculogravic Illusion. U. S. Navy Aerospace Medical Institute and National Aeronautics and Space Administration Joint Report, 976.
22. Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Diehl, R L., & Kluender, K. R (1989). On the objects of speech perception. Ecological Psychology, I, 121-144.
24. Eimer, M. (2001). Crossmodallinks in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1292-1303.
25. Erwin, T. (1995). Prospective acoustic information for object pass by. In B. G. Bardy, R J. Bootsma, and Y. Guiard (Eds.), Studies in perception and action III (pp. 325-328). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Fitch, H. L., Halwes, T., Erickson, D. M., & Libennan, A. M. (1980). Perceptual equivalence of two acoustic cues for stop consonant manner. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 343-350.
27. Fitzpatrick, P., Carello, c., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the "muscular sense." Neuroscience, 60, 551-568.
28. Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3-28.
29. Fowler, C. A. (1990). Sound-producing sources as object of perception: Rate nominalization and nonspeech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1236-1249.
30. Fowler, C. A. (1996). Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1730-1741.
31. Fowler, C. A., & Dekle, D. J. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Cross-modal contributions to speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 816-828.
32. Fowler, C. A., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1991). Perception of the phonetic gesture. In I. G. Mattingly and M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the motor theory (33-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Freed, D. J. (1990). Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive events. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 311-322.
34. Gaver, W. W. (1988). Everyday listening and auditory icons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
35. Gaver, W. W. (1993a). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5, 1-29.
36. Gaver, W. W. (1993b). How do we hear in the world? Explorations in ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology, 5, 285-313.
37. Gelfer, M. P. (1987). An AER study of stop-consonant discrimination. Perception and Psychophysic, 42, 318-327.
38. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
39. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
40. Glave, R. D., & Reitveld, A. C. M. (1975). Is the effort dependence of speech loudness explicable on the basis of acoustical cues? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 133-140.
41. Goldstein, E. B. (2002). Sensation and perception (6th edition). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth Thomson.
42. Gordon, M. S. (2002). Audiovisual time-to-arrivaljudgments: Testing the primacy of multi modal integration. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
43. Gordon, M. S., & Rosenblum, L. D. (In press). Effects of intra-stimulus modality change on audiovisual time-to-arrival judgments. Perception and Psychophysics.
44. Green, K. P. (1998). The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic processing: Implications for theories of speech perception. In R. Campbell and B. Dodd (Eds.), Hearing by eye II: Advances in the psychology of speech reading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 3-25). London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Green, K. P., & Gerdman, A. (1995). Cross-modal discrepancies in coarticulation and the integration of speech information: The McGurk effect with mismatched vowels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1409-1426.
46. Green, K. P., & Norrix, L. (2001). The perception of Irl and III in a stop cluster: Evidence of crossmodal context effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Peiformance, 27, 166-177.
47. Halle, M. (1985). Speculations about the representation of words in memory. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics (pp. 101-104). New York: Academic Press.
48. Kinney, J. A., & Luria, S. M. (1970). Conflicting visual and tactual-kinesthetic stimulation. Perception and Psychophysics, S, 189-192.
49. Kitagawa, N., & Ichihara, S. (2002). Hearing visual motion in depth. Nature, 416, 172-174.
50. Knudsen, E.J. (2002). Instructed leaming in the auditory localization pathway of the bam owl. Nature, 417, 322-328.
51. Knudsen, E. I., & Knudsen, P. F. (1983). Space-mapped auditory projections from the inferior colliculus to the optic tectum in the bam owl (Tyto alba). Journal of Comparative Neurology, 21S, 187-196.
52. Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, SO, 97-126.
53. Kunkler-Peck, A., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). Hearing shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Peiformance, 1, 279-294.
54. Lachs, L. In Research on spoken language processing 241-258 (Indiana University, Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Bloomington, Indiana, 1999).
55. Ladavas, E., Pavani, F., & Fame, A. (2001). Auditory per personal space in humans: A case of auditory-tactile extinction. Neurocase, 7, 97-103.
56. Ladefoged, P., & McKinney, N. P. (1963). Loudness, sound pressure, and subglottal pressure in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 454-460.
57. Lakatos, S., McAdams, S., & Causse, R. (1997). The representation of auditory source characteristics: Simple geometric form. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1180-1190.
58. Laurienti, P. J., Burdette, J. H., Wallace, M. T., Yen, Y. F., Field, A. S., & Stein, B. E. (2002). Deactivitation of sensory-specific cortex by cross-modal stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 14, 420-429.
59. Lee, D. N. (1990). Getting around with light or sound. In R. Warren and A. Wertheim (Eds.), Perception and control of self-motion (pp. 487-505). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Lee, D., van der Weel, F. R., Hitchcock, T., Matejowssky, E., & Pettigrew, J. (1992). Common principle of guidance by echolocation and vision. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 171, 563-571.
61. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-tocollision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
62. Lehiste, I., & Peterson, G. E. (1959). Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 428-435.
63. Li, X., Logan, R J., & Pastore, R E. (1991). Perception of acoustic source characteristics: Walking sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 3036-3049.
64. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
65. Liberman, A., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1978). Phonetic perception. In R Held, H. Leibowitz, and H. L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook for sensory physiology, Vol. VIII: Perception. New York: Springer-Verlag.
66. Liberman, A. M., & Whalen, D. H. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187-196.
67. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
68. Lieberman, P., Crelin, E. S., & Klatt, D. H. (1972). Phonetic ability and related anatomy of the newborn and adult human, Neanderthal man, and the chimpanzee. American Anthropologist, 74, 287-307.
69. Locke, J. (1689). An essay concerning human understanding. 1974. New York: Anchor Books.
70. Lufti, R A., & Wang, W. (1999). Correlational analysis of acoustic cues for the discrimination of auditory motion, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 919-928.
71. MacLeod, A., & Summerfield, Q. (1990). A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.British Journal of Audiology, 24, 29-43.
72. MacNeilage, P. F. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 499-546.
73. MacSweeney, M., Amaro, E., Calvert, G. A., & Campbell, R (2000). Silent speechreading in the absence of scanner noise: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11, 1729-1733.
74. Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye. In B. Dodd and R Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 53-83). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75. Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., Gesi, A., Heredia, R, & Tsuzaki, M. (1993). Bimodal speech perception: An examination across languages. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 445-478.
76. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
77. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. W. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
78. Mergner, T., & Rosemeier, T. (1998). Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions-a conceptual model. Brain Research Reviews, 28, 118-135.
79. Mesulam, M. M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain, 121, 1013-1052.
80. Mills, A. E. (1987). The development of phonology in the blind child. In B. Dodd and R Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
81. Mottonen, R, Krause, C. M., Tiippana, K., & Sams, M. (2002). Processing of changes in visual speech in the human auditory cortex. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 417-425.
82. Munhall, K. G., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (1998). The moving face during speech communication. In R Campbell, B. Dodd, and D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by Eye: Part 2, The Psychology of Speech reading and Audiovisual Speech (pp. 123-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83. Neuhoff, J. G. (1998). Perceptual bias for rising tones. Nature, 395, 123-124.
84. Neuhoff, J. G. (2004). Localization and motion. In J. Neuhoff (Ed.), Ecological psychoacoustics. Burlington, Mass.: Elsevier.
85. Neuhoff, J. G., & McBeath, M. K. (1996). The Doppler illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 970-985.
86. Neville, H. J. (1990). Intermodal competition and compensation in development. Evidence from studies of the visual system in congenitally deaf adults. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 71-91.
87. Newton, I. (1730) Opticks, or, A treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections and colours of light (4th ed.). London: Printed for W. Innys.
88. Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 355-376.
89. Nygaard, L. c., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42-46.
90. Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of FO of voice. Phonetica, 41, 1-16.
91. Ohala, J. J. (1996). Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1718-1725.
92. Palmeri, T. J., Goldinger, S. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 309-328.
93. Pavani, F., Meneghello, F., & Ladavas, E. (2001). Deficit of auditory space perception in patients with visuospatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1401-1409.
94. Pollack, I., & Rose, M. (1967). Effect of head movement on localization of sounds in the equatorial plane. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 591-596.
95. Radeau, M., & Bertelson, P. (1974). The after-effects of ventriloquism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 63-71.
96. Rauschecker, J. P., & Korte, M. (1993). Auditory compensation for early blindness in cat cerebral cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 4538-4548.
97. Rebillard, G., Carlier, E., Rebillard, M., & Pujol, R (1977). Enhancement of visual responses on the primary auditory cortex of the cat after an early destruction of cochlear receptors. Brain Research, 129, 162-164.
98. Rebillard, G., Rebillard, M., & Pujol, R. (1980). Factors affecting the recording of visual-evoked potentials from the deaf cat primary auditory cortex (AI). Brain Research, 188, 252-254.
99. Reisberg, D., McLean, J., & Goldfield, A. (1987). Easy to hear but hard to understand: A lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. In B. Dodd and R Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
100. Remez, R E., Fellowes, J. M., & Rubin, P. E. (1997). Talker identification based on phonetic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23, 651-666.
101. Remez, R, Rubin, P., Pisoni, D., & Carrell, T. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947-950.
102. Repp, B. H. (1987). The sound of two hands clapping: An exploratory study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1100-1110.
103. Rogers, B. J., & Collett, T. S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 697-717.
104. Rosenblum, L. D. (In press). The primacy of multimodal speech perception. In D. Pisoni and R Remez (Eds.), Handbook of Speech Perception. Blackwell: Malden, MA.
105. Rosenblum, L. D., & Fowler, C A. (1991). Audiovisual investigation of the loudness-effort effect for speech and nonspeech events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 976-985.
106. Rosenblum, L. D., & Saldana, H. (1996). An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Peiformance, 22, 318-33l.
107. Rosenblum, L. D., & Saldana, H. (1998). Time-varying information for visual speech perception. In R. Campell, B. Dodd, and D. Burnham (Eds.), Hearing by eye II: Advances in the psychology of speech reading and auditory-visual speech (pp. 61-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
108. Rosenblum, L. D., Johnson, J. A., & Saldana, H. M. (1996). Visual kinematic information for embellishing speech in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39, 1159-1170.
109. Rosenblum, L. D., Schmuckler, M. A., & Johnson, J. A. (1997). The McGurk effect in infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 347-357.
110. Rosenblum, L. D., Gordon, M. S., & Jarquin, L. (2000). Echolocation by moving and stationary listeners. Ecological Psychology, 12, 181-206.
111. Rosenblum, L. D., Smith, N. M., Nichols, S., Lee, J., & Hale, S. (Under review). Hearing a face: Cross-modal speaker matching using isolated visible speech. Perception and Psychophysics.
112. Rosenblum, L. D., Wuestefeld, A., & Anderson, K. (1996). Auditory reachability: An affordance approach to the perception of distance. Ecological Psychology, 8, 1-24.
113. Rosenblum, L. D., Wuestefeld, A., & Saldana, H. (1993). Auditory looming perception: influences on anticipator judgments. Perception, 22, 1467-1482.
114. Rosenblum, L. D., Yakel, D. A., Baseer, N., Panchal, A., Nordarse, B. C., & Niehus, R P. (2002).Visual speech information for face recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 64(2), 220-229.
115. Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibanez, V., Deiber, M. P., Dold, G., & Hallett M. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380, 526-528.
116. Saldana, H. M., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1993). Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 406-416.
117. Sams, M., Aulanko, R, Hamalainen, M., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., Lu, S.-T., & Simola, J. (1991). Seeing speech: Visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 127, 141-145.
118. Schiff, W, & Oldak, R (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303-316.
119. Schwartz, D. A., Howe, C, & Purves, D. (2003). The statistical structure of human speech sounds predicts musical universals. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 7160-7168.
120. Schweinberger, S. R., & Soukup, G. R. (1998). Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1748-1765.
121. Sekiyama, K., & Tokhura, Y (1991). McGurk effect in non-English listeners: Few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1797-1805.
122. Sekiyama, K., & Tokhura, Y (1993). Inter-language differences in the influence of visual cues in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 427-444.
123. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y, Thompson, S., & Shimojo, S. (2001). Sound alters visual evoked potentials in humans. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12, 3849-3852.
124. Shaw, B. K., McGowan, R., & Turvey, M. T. (1991). An acoustic variable specifying time to contact. Ecological Psychology, 3, 253-261.
125. Sheffert, S. M., & Fowler, C. A. (1995). The effects of voice and visible speaker change on memory for spoken words. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 665--685.
126. Shimojo, S., & Shams, L. (2001). Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: Plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 505-509.
127. Silverman, K. (1986). Fo segmental cues depend on intonation: The case of the rise after voiced stops. Phonetica, 43, 76.
128. Silverman, K. (1987). The structure and processing of fundamental frequency contours. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
129. Smith, M. R. (1984). Temporal aspects of word stress. Dissertation Abstracts International. 44(10-A), 3052-3053.
130. Speigle, J. M., & Loomis, J. M. (1993). Auditory distance perception by translating observers. In Proceedings of IEEE 1993 Symposium on Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality (pp. 92-99). San Jose, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society.
131. Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A. (1993). The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
132. Stevens, K. N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 3-45.
133. Stoffregen, T. A., & Bardy, B. G. (2001). On specification and the senses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 195-261.
134. Stoffregen, T. A., & Pittenger, J. B. (1995). Human echolocation as a basic form of perception and action. Ecological Psychology, 7, 181-216.
135. Strange, W., Jenkins, J. J., & Johnson, T. L. (1983). Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 695-705.
136. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
137. Summerfield, Q. (1987). Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. In B. Dodd and R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 53-83). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
138. Thurlow, W. R., & Runge, P. S. (1967). Effect of induced head movements on localization of direction of sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 42, 480-488.
139. Vanderveer, N. J. (1979). Ecological acoustics: Human perception of environmental sounds. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40/09B, 4543 (University Microfilms No. 8004002).
140. Walley, A., & Carrell, T. (1983). Onset spectra and formant transitions in the adult's and child's perception of place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1011-1022.
141. Warren, R. M. (1981). Measurement of sensory intensity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 175-223.
142. Warren, W. H., & Verbrugge, R. R. (1983). Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: A case study in ecological acoustics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 704--712.
143. Wildes, R., & Richards, W. (1988). Recovering material properties from sound. In W. Richards (Ed.), Natural computation (pp. 356-363). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
144. Yakel, D. A. (2000) Effects of time-varying information on vowel identification accuracy in visual speech perception. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
145. Yakel, D. A., Rosenblum, L. D., & Fortier, M. A. (2000). Effects of talker variability on speechreading. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1405-1412.
146. Yakel, D. A., Rosenblum, L. D., Smith, N., & Burns, D.(In preparation). Salience of time varying information for visual speech perception.
147. Yehia, H. C., Rubin, P. E., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (1998) Quantitative association of vocal-tract and facial behavior. Speech Communication, 26, 23-43.
148. Zangaladze, A., Epstein, C. M., Grafton, S. T., & Sathian, K. (1999). Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature, 401, 587-590.