The concept of scientific dishonesty: Ethics, value systems, and research

Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, Fourth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 3-13

  Riis, Povl ^a  

^a EU Stakeholder Boards for Brain Research   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139604925     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780429073328-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Riis P. Sociology and psychology within the scope of scientific dishonesty. Sci Eng Ethics 2000; 6: 35-9.
2. Lomborg B. The Sceptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
3. Danish Boards on Scientific Dishonesty. Annual Report 2005. Copenhagen: Directorate of Science and Innovation, 2006.
4. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Acceptable secondary publication. In: Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication, Section III.D.3. www.icmje.org (updated October 2007).
5. Danish National Committees on Scientific Dishonesty. Annual Reports 1993-1997. Copenhagen: The Research Councils, 1993-1997.
6. Riis P, Andersen D. Scientific authorship. In Annual Report 1996. Copenhagen: The Research Councils, 1996: 31-5.
7. Andersen D. Guidelines for good scientific practice. In: Annual Report 1997. Copenhagen: The Research Councils, 1997: 15-18.
8. European Group on Ethics (EGE). Opinion on the Ethical Aspects of Nanomedicine. Brussels: European Commission, 2007.
9. Working Party of Nuffield Council of Bioethics. The Ethics of Research Related to Health Care in Developing Countries. London: Nuffield Foundation, 2002.
10. Marshall PA. Ethical Challenges in Study Design and Informed Consent for Health Research in Resource-Poor Settings. Geneva: UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme on Research and Training on Tropical Diseases, 2007. www.who.int/tdr/publications/publications/seb_topic5.htm.
11. Andersen D, Attrup L, Axelsen N, Riis P. Scientific Dishonesty and Good Scientific Practice. Copenhagen: Danish Medical Research Council, 1992.
12. Danish Ministry of Science. Instruction: Committees on Scientific Dishonesty. Supplement to Law No. 676 of 19 August 1997.
13. Philips M. Should coauthors share liability? Science 2002; 298: 1554.
14. Werkö L. Utredning av forskningsfusk: myndigheternas ansvar. Läkartidningen 2006; 103: 2563-5.
15. Ulfendahl M, Rydqvist B. Sverige behover ny instans som utreder forskningsfusk. Läkartidningen 2006; 103: 3261-2.
16. Chalmers I. Role of systematic reviews detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak. BMJ 2006; 333: 594-6.
17. Danish National Committee on Scientific Dishonesty. Guidelines for agreements at the initiation of research projects, on the rights and duties in the storage and use of research data, and guidelines concerning authorship. Dan Med Bull 1999; 46: 60-7.
18. Andersen D. Cases during the Committee’s first five years. In: Annual Report 1997. Copenhagen: The Research Councils, 1997: 9-14.