SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Volumn 103, Issue 36, 2006, Pages 2563-2565

Utredning av forskningsfusk: Myndigheternas ansvar

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; NORWAY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM;

GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NORWAY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SWEDEN;

EID: 33748636035 PISSN: 00237205 EISSN: None Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article

Times cited : (3)

References (14)

1
- 33646249366
- Forskningsfusk, felsteg eller något mittemellan?
- Levi R. Forskningsfusk, felsteg eller något mittemellan? Läkartidningen. 2006;103:1203-5.
- (2006) Läkartidningen , vol.103 , pp. 1203-1205
- Levi, R.¹

2
- 33645697146
- Cleaning up the paper trail
- Unger K, Couzin J. Cleaning up the paper trail. Science. 2006;312:38-43.
- (2006) Science , vol.312 , pp. 38-43
- Unger, K.¹ Couzin, J.²

3
- 0037164371
- Institutional corruption in medicine
- Wilmshurst P. Institutional corruption in medicine. BMJ. 2002;325:1232-5.
- (2002) BMJ , vol.325 , pp. 1232-1235
- Wilmshurst, P.¹

4
- 1342330454
- Better governance in academic health sciences centres: Moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex affair in Toronto
- Ferris LE, Singer PA, Naylor CD. Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex affair in Toronto. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:25-9.
- (2004) J Med Ethics , vol.30 , pp. 25-29
- Ferris, L.E.¹ Singer, P.A.² Naylor, C.D.³

5
- 0034706332
- Investigating allegations of research misconduct: The vital need for due process
- Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process. BMJ. 2000;321:752-5.
- (2000) BMJ , vol.321 , pp. 752-755
- Hey, E.¹ Chalmers, I.²

6
- 33645746409
- Outcome after neonatal continuous negative-pressure ventilation: Follow-up assessment
- Telford K, Waters L, Vyas H, Manktelow BN, Draper ES, Marlow N. Outcome after neonatal continuous negative-pressure ventilation: follow-up assessment. Lancet. 2006;367:1080-5.
- (2006) Lancet , vol.367 , pp. 1080-1085
- Telford, K.¹ Waters, L.² Vyas, H.³ Manktelow, B.N.⁴ Draper, E.S.⁵ Marlow, N.⁶

7
- 33645856144
- Southall's CNEP more than stands up to scrutiny
- Anonymous. Southall's CNEP more than stands up to scrutiny. Lancet. 2006;367:1030.
- (2006) Lancet , vol.367 , pp. 1030

8
- 33645751580
- Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP true?
- Hey E, Chalmers I. Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP true? Lancet. 2006;367:1032-3.
- (2006) Lancet , vol.367 , pp. 1032-1033
- Hey, E.¹ Chalmers, I.²

9
- 33645750309
- CNEP needs to return
- Southall DP, Samuels MP. CNEP needs to return. Lancet. 2006;367:1033-5.
- (2006) Lancet , vol.367 , pp. 1033-1035
- Southall, D.P.¹ Samuels, M.P.²

10
- 33645735180
- CNEP and research governance
- Griffiths R. CNEP and research governance. Lancet. 2006;367:1037-8.
- (2006) Lancet , vol.367 , pp. 1037-1038
- Griffiths, R.¹

11
- 33645728677
- Southall and colleagues vindicated once more
- Craft AW, McIntosh N. Southall and colleagues vindicated once more. Lancet. 2006;367:1035-7.
- (2006) Lancet , vol.367 , pp. 1035-1037
- Craft, A.W.¹ McIntosh, N.²

13
- 33748667814
- Turbulent uredelighetskontroll
- Braastad OHA. Turbulent uredelighetskontroll. Forskningspolitikk. 2006;29 årgång 2:19.
- (2006) Forskningspolitikk , vol.29 , Issue.2 , pp. 19
- Braastad, O.H.A.¹

14
- 33748659055
- Vad är god forskningssed? Synpunkter, riktlinjer och exempel
- Gustafsson B, Hermerén G, Petersson B. Vad är god forskningssed? Synpunkter, riktlinjer och exempel. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 2005;1:1-88.
- (2005) Vetenskapsrådets Rapportserie , vol.1 , pp. 1-88
- Gustafsson, B.¹ Hermerén, G.² Petersson, B.³

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.