Conclusion: Citizens in a risky world

Citizenship Through Secondary Geography

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 199-209

  Lambert, David ^a   Machon, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Wyggeston and Queen Elizabeth I College   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139604461     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203165812-61     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Adams, J. (1995) Risk, London: University College Press.
2. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.
3. Daugherty, R. and Jones, S. (1999) ‘Community, culture and identity: Geography, the National Curriculum and Wales’, The Curriculum Journal, 10, 3, pp. 443–61.
4. Dowgill, P. (1998) ‘Pupils’ conceptions of learning geography under the National Curriculum’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Education, University of London.
5. Elliott, J. (2000) ‘Revising the national curriculum: A comment on the Secretary of State’s proposals’, Journal of Education Policy, 15, 2, pp. 247–55.
6. ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme (2000) Risky Choices, Soft Disasters: Environmental Decision Making under Uncertainty, Brighton, University of Sussex.
7. Fien, J. (1999) ‘Towards a map of commitment: A socially critical approach to geographical education’, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8, 2.
8. Goodson, I. (1992) On curriculum form: Notes toward a theory of curriculum, Sociology of Education, 65, 1, pp. 66–75.
9. Grimwade, K. (2000) Geography and the New Agenda, Sheffield: The Geographical Association
10. Harvey, D. (2000) Spaces of Hope, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
11. HMSO (1988) The Education Reform Act, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
12. Lambert, D. (1994) ‘The National Curriculum: What shall we do with it?’, Geography, 79, 1, pp. 65–76.
13. Lambert, D. (1999) ‘Geography and moral education in a supercomplex world: The significance of values education and some remaining dilemmas’, Ethics, Place and Environment, 2, 1 pp. 5–18.
14. Lambert, D. and Balderstone, D. (2000) Learning to Teach Geography in the Secondary School, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
15. Marsden, W. (1989) ‘“All in a good cause”: Geography, history and the politicisation of the curriculum in nineteenth and twentieth century England’, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 6, pp. 509–26.
16. Marston, S. (2000) ‘The social construction of scale’, Progress in Human Geography, 24, 2, pp. 219–42
17. Morgan, J. (2000) ‘To which space do I belong? Imagining citizenship in one curriculum subject’, The Curriculum Journal, 11, 1, pp. 55–68.
18. Orr, D. (1999) ‘Education for globalisation’, The Ecologist, 29, 3, pp. 166–8.
19. Proctor, J. and Smith, D.M. (1999) Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain, London: Routledge.
20. Rawling, E. (1993) ‘School geography: Towards 2000’, Geography, 78, 2, pp. 110–16.
21. Rawling E (1996) ‘The impact of the National Curriculum on school-based curriculum develop- ment in secondary geography’, in Kent, A., Lambert, D., Naish, M. and Slater, F., Geography in Education: Viewpoints on Teaching and Learning, Cambridge: CUP.
22. Smith, D.M. (2000) Moral Geographies: Ethics in a World of Difference, Edunburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
23. Wallace, W. (2000) ‘The standards bearer’, Times Educational Supplement, 19 May 2000, pp. 13–15.
24. Wilson, J. (1992) ‘Moral education, values education and prejudice reduction’, in Lynch, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S. (eds) Cultural Diversity and the Schools; Volume 2: Prejudice, Polemic or Progress?, London: Falmer.