Use of Complementary Actions Decreases with Expertise

Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2709-2714

  Destefano, Marc ^a   Lindstedt, John K ^a   Gray, Wayne D ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

complementary action; embodied cognition; epistemic action; expertise; games; pragmatic action; soft constraints hypothesis; Tetris

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY ACTION; EMBODIED COGNITION; EPISTEMIC ACTIONS; EXPERTISE; GAME; PRAGMATIC ACTION; SOFT CONSTRAINT; SOFT CONSTRAINT HYPOTHESIS; TETRIS; VIDEO-GAMES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 85139499677     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bourne, L. E., Raymond, W. D., & Healy, A. F. (2010). Strategy Selection and Use During Classification Skill Acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(2), 500-514.
2. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Gray, W. D., & Fu, W.-T. (2004). Soft constraints in interactive behavior: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 359-382.
4. Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113(3), 461-482.
5. Gray, W. D., & Veksler, V. D. (2005). The acquisition and asymmetric transfer of interactive routines. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci2005 (pp. 809-814). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
6. Kirsh, D. (1995). Complementary strategies: Why we use our hands when we think. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.), 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 212-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Kirsh, D. (1996). Adapting the environment instead of oneself. Adaptive Behavior, 4(3-4), 415-452.
8. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513–549.
9. Maglio, P., & Kirsh, D. (1996). Epistemic action increases with skill. 18th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 391-396): Cognitive Science Society.
10. Morgan, P. L., Patrick, J., Waldron, S. M., King, S. L., & Patrick, T. (2009). Improving memory after interruption: Exploiting soft constraints and manipulating information access cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 291-306.
11. Morgan, P. L., Waldron, S. M., King, S. L., & Patrick, J. (2007, Jul 22-27). Harder to access, better performance? The effects of information access cost on strategy and performance, Beijing, PEOPLES R CHINA.
12. Neth, H. (2004). Thinking by doing: Interactive problem solving with internal and external representations (No. Unpublished doctoral dissertation): School of Psychology, Cardiff University.
13. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and Automatic Human Information-Processing .1. Detection, Search, and Attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66.
14. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and Automatic Human Information-Processing .2. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127-190.
15. Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., Duggan, G. B., Banbury, S., & Howes, A. (2008). Designing information fusion for the encoding of visual-spatial information. Ergonomics, 51(6), 775-797.
16. Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., Morgan, P. L., & King, S. L. (2007). Influencing cognitive strategy by manipulating information access. Computer Journal, 50(6), 694-702.