Exploring the Influence of Particle Filter Parameters on Order Effects in Causal Learning

Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2950-2955

  Abbott, Joshua T ^a   Griffiths, Thomas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

causal learning; order effects; particle filters; rational process models

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

A-PARTICLES; BAYESIAN MODELLING; CAUSAL LEARNING; FILTER PARAMETER; ORDERING EFFECTS; PARTICLE FILTER; PRIMACY EFFECTS; PROCESS-MODELS; RATIONAL PROCESS MODEL; RECENCY EFFECTS;

INFERENCE ENGINES;

EID: 85139458781     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Cheng, P. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405.
3. Chopin, N. (2002). A sequential particle filter method for static models. Biometrika, 89(3), 539-551.
4. Collins, D., & Shanks, D. (2002). Momentary and integrative response strategies in causal judgment. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1138.
5. Daw, N., & Courville, A. (2008). The pigeon as particle filter. Advances in neural information processing systems, 20, 369–376.
6. Dennis, M., & Ahn, W. (2001). Primacy in causal strength judgments: The effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships. Memory & Cognition, 29(1), 152.
7. Doucet, A., Freitas, N. de, & Gordan, N. (Eds.). (2001). Sequential monte carlo methods in practice. Springer.
8. Griffiths, T., Chater, N., Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. (2010). Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 357.
9. Griffiths, T., & Tenenbaum, J. (2005). Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51(4), 334–384.
10. Levy, R., Reali, F., & Griffiths, T. (2009). Modeling the effects of memory on human online sentence processing with particle filters. Advances in neural information processing systems, 21, 937–944.
11. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
12. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (Eds.). (1998). Rational models of cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Sanborn, A., Griffiths, T., & Navarro, D. (2006). A more rational model of categorization. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 726–731).
14. Schustack, M., & Sternberg, R. (1981). Evaluation of evidence in causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(1), 101.
15. Shi, L., Feldman, N., & Griffiths, T. (2008). Performing Bayesian inference with exemplar models. In Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 745–750).