Thesaurus-based Retrieval of Case Law

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 152, Issue , 2006, Pages 61-70

  Klein, Michel C A ^a   Van Steenbergen, Wouter ^a   Uijttenbroek, Elisabeth M ^a   Lodder, Arno R ^a   Van Harmelen, Frank ^a  

^a Vrije Universiteit   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

case law; ontology; retrieval; thesaurus

Indexed keywords

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

CASE LAW; EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE; LEGAL CONCEPTS; ONTOLOGY'S; RETRIEVAL; STATISTICAL MEASURES;

THESAURI;

EID: 85139052869     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. The Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 6-11, 2005, Bologna, Italy. ACM, 2005.
2. J. Bing. Designing text retrieval systems for conceptual searching. In ICAIL, pages 43–51, 1987.
3. P. Casanovas, J. Gorroñogoitia, J. Contreras, M. Blázquez, N. Casellas, J.-J. Vallbé, M. Poblet, F. Ramos, and V. R. Benjamins. Iuriservice II: Ontology development and architectural design. In ICAIL [1], pages 188–194.
4. B. R. de Vries, R. Leenes, and J. Zeleznikow. Fundamentals of providing negotiation support online: the need for developing batnas. In J. Zeleznikow and A. R. Lodder, editors, Second international ODR Workshop (odrworkshop.info). Wolf Legal Publishers, 2005.
5. J. P. Dick. Representation of legal text for conceptual retrieval. In ICAIL, pages 244–253, 1991.
6. J. C. Hage, R. Leenes, and A. R. Lodder. Hard cases: a procedural approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2(1):113–167, 1994.
7. M.-F. Moens. Innovative techniques for legal text retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9(1):29–57, 2001.
8. E. L. Rissland, D. B. Skalak, and M. T. Friedman. BankXX: Supporting legal arguments through heuristic retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4(1):1–71, 1996.
9. G. Salton. Automatic text processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1989.
10. G. Salton and C. Buckley. Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Technical report, Ithaca, NY, USA, 1987.
11. C. C. van der Eijk, E. M. van Mulligen, J. A. Kors, B. Mons, and J. van den Berg. Constructing an associative concept space for literature-based discovery. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 55(5):436–444, 2004.
12. R. van Laarschot, W. van Steenbergen, H. Stuckenschmidt, A. R. Lodder, and F. van Harmelen. The legal concepts and the layman’s terms. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Brussels, Dec.8-10 2005. IOS Press.
13. E. van Mulligen, M. Diwersy, M. Schmidt, H. Buurman, and B. Mons. Facilitating networks of information. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, pages 868–872, 2000.
14. E. van Mulligen, C. van der Eijk, J. Kors, B. Schijvenaars, and B. Mons. Research for research: tools for knowledge discovery and visualization. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, pages 835–839, 2002.
15. K. van Noortwijk, J. Visser, and R. V. D. Mulder. Re-usable retrieval concepts for the classification of legal documents. In ICAIL [1], pages 252–253.