A Quantitative Assessment of Operational Use Evaluation of Information Technology: Benefits and Barriers

10th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 688-692

  Al Yaseen, Hussein ^a   Paul, Ray J ^a   Eldabi, Tillal ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation; information technology; operational use evaluation

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EVALUATION; OPERATIONAL USE; OPERATIONAL USE EVALUATION; POST-IMPLEMENTATION; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 85139028763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bradford, M. and Florin, J. (2003) Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resources planning systems, International Journal of Accounting Information systems, Issue 4, pp. 205-225.
2. Dabrowska, E. K. and Cornford, T. (2001) Evaluation and Telehealth – an Interpretative Study. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)-34. January 2001, Maui, Hawaii, Computer Society Press of the IEEE. Piscataway, N.J., June 2001.
3. Eldabi, T., Paul, R. and Sbeih, H. (2003) Operational Use Evaluation / Post Implementation Evaluation of IT, UKAIS, 2003, Warwick.
4. Farbey, B., Land, F. and Targett, D. (1993) How to Assess your IT Investment: A Study of Methods and Practice, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., London.
5. Farbey, B., Land, F. and Targett, D. (1999) Moving IS Evaluation Forward: Learning Themes and Research Issues, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol.8, pp.189-207.
6. Galal, G. H., McDonnell, J. T. and Paul, R. J. (2000) The Role of Interpretative Evaluation in Engineering Information Systems Requirements. Proceedings of the 2000 Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (10-13 August, Long Beach, Ca.), Editor: Chung, H. M., Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, pp. 1102-1108.
7. Gunasekaran, A., Love, P.E.D., Rahimi, F. and Miele, R. (2001) A Model for Investment Justification in Information Technology Projects, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 21, pp. 349-364.
8. Irani, Z., Sharif, A., Love, P.E.D. and Kahraman, C. (2002) Applying concepts of fuzzy cognitive mapping to model: The IT/IS investment evaluation process, International Journal of Production Economics, Issue 75, pp. 199-211.
9. Jones, S. and Hughes, J. (2000) Understanding IS Evaluation as a Complex Social Process. Proceedings of the 2000 Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (10-13 August, Long Beach, Ca.), Editor: Chung, H. M., Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, pp. 1123-1127.
10. Kumar, K. (1990) Post Implementation Evaluation of Computer Information Systems: Current Practices. Communications of the Association for Computer Machinery (ACM), Vol. 33, No. 2, N.Y., (January), Pp. 203-212.
11. Lin, C. and Pervan, G. (2003) The practice of IS/IT benefits management in large Australian organisations, International Journal of Information and Management, Issue 41, pp. 13-24.
12. Liu, Y., Yu, F., Su, S.Y.W. and Lam, H. (2003) A Cost-Benefit Evaluation Server for decision support in e-business, Journal of Decision Support Systems, Issue 36, pp. 81-97.
13. Remenyi, D., Money, A., Sherwood-Smith, M. and Irani, Z. (2000), The effective management and management of IT costs and benefits, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., London.
14. Skok, w., Kophamel, A. and Richardson, I. (2001) Diagnosing information systems success: importance-performance maps in the health club industry, International Journal of Information and Management, Issue 38, pp. 409-419.
15. Willcocks, L. and Lester, S. (1999) Beyond the IT Productivity Paradox, Chichester, UK: Wiley.