THE ROLE OF PERSONAL INNOVATIVENESS AND SELF-EFFICACY IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE: AN EXTENSION OF TAM WITH NOTIONS OF RISK

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2001

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 469-474

  Kishore, Rajiv ^a   Lee, Jungwoo ^b   McLean, Ephraim R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

computer self efficacy; personal innovativeness; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE TESTS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS;

COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; MODEL RELATIONSHIPS; PERCEIVED EASE-OF-USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PERSONAL INNOVATIVENESS; RESEARCH EFFORTS; SELF EFFICACY; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85138736575     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J. “A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology,” Information Systems Research (9:2), 1998, pp. 204-215.
2. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., and Stair, R. M. “Research Report: The Evolving Relationship between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy: An Empirical Assessment,” Information Systems Research (11:4), 2000, pp. 418-430.
3. Bandura, A. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review (84:2), 1977a, pp. 191-215.
4. Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977b.
5. Bandura, A. “Reflections on Self-Efficacy,” in Advances in Behavioral Research and Therapy (1), S. Rachman (ed.), Permagon Press, Oxford, England, 1978, pp. 237-269.
6. Barki, H., Rivard, S., and Talbot, J. “Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk,” Journal of Management Information Systems (10:2), 1993, pp. 203-225.
7. Brockhaus, R. H. “Risk-Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs,” Academy of Management Journal (23), 1980, pp. 509-520.
8. Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. “Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills,” Information Systems Research (6:2), 1995a, pp. 118-143.
9. Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. “Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,” MIS Quarterly (19:2), 1995b, pp. 189-211.
10. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., and Huff, S. “Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study,” MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, pp. 145-158.
11. Davis, F. D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, pp. 319-340.
12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science (35:8), 1989, pp. 982-1003.
13. DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research (3:1), 1992, pp. 60-95.
14. Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., and Rosen, B. “Effects of Alternative Training Methods on Self-Efficacy and Performance in Computer Software Training,” Journal of Applied Psychology (74:6), 1989, pp. 882-889.
15. Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly (19:2), 1995, pp. 213-236.
16. Hill, T., Smith, N. D., and Mann, M. F. “Communicating Innovations: Convincing Computer Phobics to Adopt Innovative Technologies,” in Advances in Consumer Research, R. J. Lutz (ed.), Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, 1986, pp. 419-422.
17. Hill, T., Smith, N. D., and Mann, M. F. “Role of Efficacy Expectations in Predicting the Decision to Use Advanced Technologies: The Case of Computers,” Journal of Applied Psychology (72:2), 1987, pp. 307-313.
18. Igbaria, M., and Iivari, J. “The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Computer Usage,” OMEGA. The International Journal of Management Science (23:6), 1995, pp. 587-605.
19. Johnson, R. D., and Marakas, G. M. “Research Report: The Role of Behavioral Modeling in Computer Skills Acquisition— Toward Refinement of the Model,” Information Systems Research (11:4), 2000, pp. 402-417.
20. Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K.-K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., and Wassenaar, A. “A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects,” MIS Quarterly (24:2), 2000, pp. 299-325.
21. Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., and Johnson, R. D. “The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research,” Information Systems Research (9:2), 1998, pp. 126-163.
22. Mellers, B. A., and Chang, S.-J. “Representations of Risk Judgments,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (57:2), 1994, pp. 167-184.
23. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, 1995.
24. Sitkin, S. B., and Pablo, A. L. “Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior,” Academy of Management Review (17:1), 1992, pp. 9-38.
25. Sitkin, S. B., and Weingart, L. R. “Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity,” Academy of Management Journal (38:6), 1995, pp. 1573-1592.
26. Venkatesh, V. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Information Systems Research (11:4), 2000, pp. 342-365.
27. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences (27:3), 1996, pp. 451-481.
28. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science (46:2), 2000, pp. 186-204.
29. Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M. G. “Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior,” MIS Quarterly (24:1), 2000, pp. 115-139.
30. Vlek, C., and Stallen, P. J. “Rational and Personal Aspects of Risk,” Acta Psychologica (45), 1980, pp. 273-300.