SOCIAL INFLUENCE AND INDIVIDUAL IT USE: UNRAVELING THE PATHWAYS OF APPROPRIATION MOVES

Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 113-118

  Jasperson, Jon Sean ^a   Sambamurthy, V ^b   Zmud, Robert W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85138679311     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Adams, D. A.; Nelson, R. R.; and Todd, P. A. “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), June 1992, pp. 227-247.
2. Allen, T. J.; Tushman, M. L.; and Lee, D. M. S. “Technology Transfer as a Function of Position in the Spectrum from Research through Development,” Academy of Management Journal (22:4), 1979, pp. 694-708.
3. Asch, S. E. Social Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1952.
4. Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1986.
5. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (51:6), December 1986, pp. 1173-1182.
6. Bohn, R. E. “Measuring and Managing Technological Knowledge,” Sloan Management Review (36:1), Fall 1994, pp. 61-73.
7. Contractor, N. S.; Seibold, D. R.; and Heller, M. A. “Interactional Influence in the Structuring of Media Use in Groups: Influence in Members’ Perceptions of Group Decision Support System Use,” Human Communication Research (22:4), June 1996, pp. 451-481.
8. Cooper, R. B., and Zmud, R. W. “Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach,” Management Science (36:2), February 1990, pp. 123-139.
9. Cox, D. R., and Snell, E. J. Analysis of Binary Data, New York: Chapman and Hall, 1989.
10. Davis, F. D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), September 1989, pp. 319-340.
11. Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; and Warshaw, P. R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science (35:6), August 1989, pp. 982-1003.
12. DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M. S. “Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory,” Organization Science (5:2), May 1994, pp. 121-147.
13. Dutton, J. M., and Thomas, A. “Relating Technological Change and Learning by Doing,” in Research on Technological Innovation, Management, and Policy, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 1985, pp. 187-224.
14. Fulk, J.; Schmitz, J.; and Steinfield, C. W. “A Social Influence Model of Technology Use,” in Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk and C. W. Steinfield (eds.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990, pp. 117-140.
15. Fulk, J.; Steinfield, C. W.; Schmitz, J.; and Power, J. G. “A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations,” Communication Research (14:5), October 1987, pp. 529-552.
16. Garud, R. “On the Distinction Between Know-How, Know-Why, and Know-What,” in Organizational Learning and Strategic Management, J. P. Walsh and A. S. Huff (eds.), Greenwich, CT: Press Inc., 1997, pp. 81-101.
17. Hackman, J. R. “Group Influences on Individuals,” in Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, M. D. Dunnette (ed.), Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, 1976, pp. 1455-1525.
18. Hosmer, D. W., Jr., and Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
19. Kim, D. H. “The Link Between Individual and Organizational Learning,” Sloan Management Review (35:1), Fall 1993, pp. 37-50.
20. Kling, R., and Iacono, S. “The Control of Information Systems Developments After Implementation,” Communications of the ACM (27:12), December 1984, pp. 1218-1226.
21. Kraut, R. E.; Rice, R. E.; Cool, C.; and Fish, R. S. “Varieties of Social Influence: The Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium,” Organization Science (9:4), July-August 1998, pp. 437-453.
22. Latham, G. P., and Saari, L. M. “Application of Social-Learning Theory to Training Supervisors Through Behavioral Modeling,” Journal of Applied Psychology (64:3), 1979, pp. 239-246.
23. Leonard-Barton, D. “Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations: Limits and Opportunities for Management Strategies,” Communication Research (15:5), October 1988, pp. 603-631.
24. Leonard-Barton, D., and Deschamps, I. “Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology,” Management Science (34:10), October 1988, pp. 1252-1265.
25. Lind, M. R., and Zmud, R. W. “The Influence of a Convergence in Understanding Between Technology Providers and Users on Information Technology Innovativeness,” Organization Science (2:2), May 1991, pp. 195-217.
26. Manz, C. C., and Sims, H. P. “Beyond Imitation: Complex Behavioral and Affective Linkages Resulting from Exposure to Leadership Training Models,” Journal of Applied Psychology (71:4), November 1986, pp. 571-578.
27. McKenney, J. L . Waves of Change: Business Evolution through Information Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1995.
28. Moch, M., and Seashore, S. E. “How Norms Affect Behaviors In and Of Corporations,” in Handbook of Organizational Design, P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, 1981, pp. 210-237.
29. Nonaka, I. “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science (5:1), February 1994, pp. 14-37.
30. Nonaka, I.,and Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
31. Orlikowski, W. J. “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science (3:3), August 1992, pp. 398-427.
32. Prasad, P. “Symbolic Processes in the Implementation of Technological Change: A Symbolic Interactionist Study of Work Computerization,” Academy of Management Journal (36:6), December 1993, pp. 1400-1429.
33. Rice, R. E.; Grant, A. E.; Schmitz, J.; and Torobin, J. “Individual and Network Influences on the Adoption and Perceived Outcomes of Electronic Messaging,” Social Networks (12:1), March 1990, pp. 27-55.
34. Robey, D. “Information Systems and Organizational Change: A Comparative Case Study,” Systems Objectives Solutions (3), 1983, pp. 143-154.
35. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press, 1995.
36. Saga, V. L. The Nature and Determinants of Information Technology Infusion: An Organizational Level of Analysis, Unpublished Dissertation, Information and Management Sciences, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 1994.
37. Saga, V. L., and Zmud, R. W. “The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion,” in Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology, L. Levine (ed.), Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1994, pp. 67-86.
38. Schmitz, J., and Fulk, J. “Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail: A Test of the Social Influence Model of Technology Use,” Communication Research (18:4), August 1991, pp. 487-523.
39. Tornatzky, L. G., and Klein, K. J. “Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings,” IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management (EM-29:1), February 1982, pp. 28-45.
40. Weick, K. E. “Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies,” in Technology and Organizations, P. S. Goodman, L. S. Sproull and Associates (eds.), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990, pp. 1-44.
41. Zmud, R. W., and Apple, L. E. “Measuring Technology Incorporation/Infusion,” Journal of Product Innovation Management (9:2), 1992, pp. 148-155.