Consistent physics underlying ballistic motion prediction

Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 3426-3431

  Smith, Kevin A ^a   Battaglia, Peter ^b   Vul, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

ballistic motion prediction; intuitive physics; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BALLISTICS; MOTION ESTIMATION;

BALLISTIC MOTION PREDICTION; BALLISTIC MOTIONS; HUMAN MODELLING; INTUITIVE PHYSIC; MOTION PREDICTION; PHYSICAL LAWS; PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES; PREDICTION TASKS; TASK-BASED; UNCERTAINTY;

FORECASTING;

EID: 85136522037     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Anzai, Y., & Yokoyama, T. (1984). Internal models in physics problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 1(4), 397-450.
2. Battaglia, P., & Schrater, P. R. (2007). Humans trade off viewing time and movement duration to improve visuomotor accuracy in a fast reaching task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(26), 6984-6994.
3. Brouwer, A.-M., & Knill, D. C. (2009). Humans use visual and remembered information about object locations to plan pointing movements. Journal of Vision, 9(1), 1-19.
4. Caramazza, A., McCloskey, M., & Green, B. (1981). Naive beliefs in "sophisticated" subjects: Misconceoptions about trajectories of objects. Cognition, 9, 117-123.
5. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 105-225.
6. Faisal, A. A., & Wolpert, D. M. (2009). Near optimal combination of sensory and motor uncertainty in time during a naturalistic perception-action task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 1901-1912.
7. Gerstenberg, T., Goodman, N., Lagnado, D. A., & Tenenbaum, J. (2012). Noisy Newtons: Unifying process and dependency accounts of causal attribution. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan.
8. Hamrick, J., Battaglia, P., & Tenenbaum, J. (2011). Internal physics models guide probabilistic judgments about object dynamics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA.
9. Hudson, T. E., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2008). Optimal compensation for temporal uncertainty in movement planning. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(7). doi: doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000130
10. Kaiser, M. K., Jonides, J., & Alexander, J. (1986). Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems. Memory & Cognition, 14(4), 308-312.
11. Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R., & McCloskey, M. (1985). The development of beliefs about falling objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 38(6), 533-539.
12. Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R., Whelan, S. M., & Hecht, H. (1992). Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 669-689.
13. McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A., & Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects. Science, 210(5), 1139-1141.
14. Pittenger, J. B. (1985). Estimation of pendulum length from information in motion. Perception, 14, 247-256.
15. Pittenger, J. B. (1990). Detection of violations of the law of pendulum motion: Observers' sensitivity to the relation between period and length. Ecological Psychology, 2(1), 55-81.
16. Proffitt, D. R., & Gilden, D. L. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 384-393.
17. Sanborn, A. N., Mansinghka, V. K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2013). Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. Psychological Review, 120(2), 411-437.
18. Saxberg, B. V. H. (1987). Projected free fall trajectories II: Human experiments. Biological Cybernetics, 56, 177-184.
19. Smith, K. A., & Vul, E. (2013). Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(1), 185-199.
20. Stocker, A. A., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2006). Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nature Neuroscience, 9(4), 578-585.
21. Téglás, E., Vul, E., Girotto, V., Gonzalez, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Bonatti, L. L. (2011). Pure reasoning in 12-month-old infants as probabilistic inference. Science, 332, 1054-1059.
22. Todd, J. T., & Warren, W. H. (1982). Visual perception of relative mass in dynamic events. Perception, 11, 325-335.
23. Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E. P., & Adelson, E. H. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5(6), 598-604.