Video quality testing

Digital Video Image Quality and Perceptual Coding

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 125-153

  Corriveau, Philip ^a  

^a Intel Media and Acoustics Perception Lab   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85133597628     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. J. W. Allnatt. Subjective assessment method for television digital codecs. Electronics Letters, 16(12):450-451, June 1980.
2. P. Corriveau and et al. All subjective scales are not created equal: The effects of context on different scales. Signal Processing, 77:1-9, 1999.
3. P. Corriveau and A. Webster. VQEG evaluation of objective methods of video quality assessment. SMPTE Journal, 108:645-648, 1999.
4. A. F. Inglis and A. C. Luther. Video Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.
5. ITU-R. Investigation of Contextual Effects. ITU-R, Canada, France, Germany, Switzerland, March 1997. ITU-R Document 11E/34-E, 24.
6. ITU. ITU-R BT. 500-9, methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. ITU-R BT, 1998.
7. I. F. MacDiarmid and P. J. Darby. Double-stimulus assessment of television picture quality. EBU Technical Review, E78-A(192):70-78, April 1982.
8. N. Narita. Consideration of subjective evaluation method for quality of image coding. Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part 3, 77(7):84-103, 1994.
9. N. Narita. Proposal of a modified ebu method for reliable evaluation of picture quality. NHK Laboratories Note, E78-A(431):1-10, December 1994.
10. N. Narita. Effect of impairment ranges on reliability of the modified ebu method. IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, E78-A(11):1553-1555, November 1997.
11. N. Narita and Y. Sugiura. On an absolute evaluation method of the quality of television sequences. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 43(1):26-35, 1997.
12. M. H. Pinson and S. Wolf. Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies. In SPIE Video Communications and Image Processing Conference, 146-157, Lugano, Switzerland, July 2003.
13. D. R. Riskey. Use and abuses of category scales in sensory measurement. Journal of Sensory Studies I, 217-236, 1986.
14. V. Sarris. Adaptation-level theory: Two critical experiments on Helson's weighted average model. American Journal of Psychology, 80:331-334, 1967.
15. VQEG. Final Report from the Video Quality Experts Group on the Validation of Objective Models of Video Quality Assessment, Phase II. VQEG, August 2003. (Accessible at anonymous ftp site: ftp://ftp.its.bldrdoc.gov/dist/ituvidq/).
16. T. White and J. Allnatt. Double-stimulus quality rating method for television digital codecs. Electronics letters, 16(18):714-716, 1980.
17. W. Zou and P. Corriveau. Methods for evaluation of digital television picture quality. In SMPTE 138th Technical Conference and World Media Expo, 146-157, October 1996.