On an absolute evaluation method of the quality of television sequences

IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 26-35

  Narita, Nagato ^a   Sugiura, Yukio ^a  

^a NHK SCIENCE AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPH THEORY; IMAGE QUALITY; RELIABILITY; TESTING;

DOUBLE STIMULUS CONTINUOUS QUALITY SCALE METHOD; SINGLE STIMULUS CONTINUOUS QUALITY SCALE METHOD; TELEVISION DIGITAL CODES; TELEVISION SEQUENCES;

TELEVISION PICTURE QUALITY;

EID: 0031103284     PISSN: 00189316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/11.566821     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. J. W. Allnatt, "Subjective Assessment Method Television Digital Codecs, " Electronics Letters, 16:450-451, June 1980.
2. T. A. White and J. W. Allnatt, "Double-Stimulus Quality Rating Method for Television Digital Codecs," Electronics Letters, 16: 714-716, Aug. 1980.
3. I. F. Macdiarmid and P. J. Darby, "Double-Stimulus Assessment of Television Picture Quality," EBU Review Technical, 192:70-79, Apr. 1982.
4. "Recommendation ITU-R BT. 500-6, Method for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures," 1994 BT series (Television):348-370,1994.
5. N. Narita, "Subjective-Evaluation Method for Quality of Coded Images," IEEE Trans. Broadcasting, No. 40:7-13, Mar. 1994.
6. N. Narita, "Effect of Impairment Ranges on Reliability of the Modified EBU Method," IEICE Trans. EA, E78-A:1553-1555, Nov. 1995.
7. Y. Ohtsuka, E. Nakasu, Y. Shishikui, H. Imaizumi and H. Nakanishi, "Development of 135 Mbit/s HDTV Codec," Image Communication, 4:379-387, Aug. 1992.
8. "Recommendation ITU-R BT. 710-2, Subjective Assessment Methods for Image Quality in High-Definition Television," 1994 BT series (Television):386-405, 1994.
9. W. Volk, "Applied Statistics for Engineers," McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc. :N. Y. , 1958.
10. C. E. Osgood andG. J. Suci, "Factor Analysis of Meaning," J. Experimental Psychology, 50:325-338, 1955.
11. "Report 405-5, Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures," Recommendations and Reports of the CCIR, XI-Partl:174-201, 1986.