4chan and /b/: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community

Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 50-57

  Bernstein, Michael S ^a   Monroy Hernández, Andrés ^a   Harry, Drew ^a   André, Paul ^b   Panovich, Katrina ^a   Vargas, Greg ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ONLINE SYSTEMS; SIGNAL ANALYSIS;

COMMUNITY IS; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DATA PERMANENCE; DISCUSSION BOARDS; LARGE DATASETS; ON-LINE COMMUNITIES; SIGNAL-ON; USER DATA; USER IDENTITY;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 85132398985     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Barabási, A., and Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509.
2. Barbaro, M., and Jr., T. Z. 2006. A Face Is Exposed for AOL Searcher No. 4417749. New York Times.
3. Blanchette, J., and Johnson, D. G. 2002. Data retention and the panoptic society: The social benefits of forgetfulness. The Information Society: An International Journal 18(1):33.
4. boyd, d. 2010a. Harassment by q & a: Initial thoughts on form-spring.me. http://dmlcentral.net/blog/danah-boyd/harassment-qainitial-thoughts-formspringme.
5. boyd, d. 2010b. “for the lolz”: 4chan is hacking the attention economy. http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/06/12/forthe-lolz-4chan-is-hacking-the-attention-economy.html.
6. Brophy-Warren, J. 2008. Modest web site is behind a bevy of memes. Wall Street Journal.
7. Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
8. Coleman, G. 2011.”’I did it for the lulz! but i stayed for the outrage:’ anonymous, the politics of spectacle, and geek protests against the church of scientology.”. http://techtv.mit.edu/videos/10237.
9. Collins, M., and Berge, Z. 1995. Introduction: Computer-mediated communications and the online classroom in higher education. In Berge, Z., and Collins, M., eds., Computer mediated communication and the online classroom: Vol. 2. Higher education. Hampton Press. 1–10.
10. Dibbell, J. 2009. The Assclown Offensive: How to Enrage the Church of Scientology. Wired.
11. Dibbell, J. 2010. Radical Opacity. Technology Review.
12. Donath, J. 1999. Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community. In Kollock, P., and Smith, M., eds., Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
13. Dwyer, C.; Hiltz, S.; and Passerini, K. 2007. Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In Proc. of AMCIS.
14. Eble, C. 1996. Slang & sociability: In-group language among college students. The University of North Carolina Press.
15. Facebook. 2010. Statement of rights and responsibilities. http://www.facebook.com/terms.php.
16. Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. 2000. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The Am. Econ. Rev. 90(4):980–994.
17. Gómez, V.; Kaltenbrunner, A.; and López, V. 2008. Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion threads in slashdot. In Proc. of WWW, 645–654. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
18. Grudin, J. 2002. Group dynamics and ubiquitous computing. Commun. ACM 45(12):74–78.
19. Hiltz, S.; Johnson, K.; and Turoff, M. 1986. Experiments in group decision making communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research 13(2):225–252.
20. Hudson, J. M., and Bruckman, A. 2004. “Go away”: Participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. The Information Society: An International Journal 20(2):127.
21. Jessup, L.; Connolly, T.; and Galegher, J. 1990. The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly 14(3):313–321.
22. Joachims, T.; Granka, L.; Pan, B.; Hembrooke, H.; and Gay, G. 2005. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proc. of SIGIR, 154–161.
23. Joyce, E., and Kraut, R. 2006. Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. J. of Computer-Mediated Comm. 11(3):723–747.
24. Kirkpatrick, D. 2010. The Facebook Effect. Simon & Schuster.
25. Lampe, C., and Resnick, P. 2004. Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space. In Proc. of CHI, 543–550.
26. Leckart, S. 2009. The Official Prankonomy: From rickrolls to malware, a spectrum of stunts. Wired 17(9):91–93.
27. Mackey, R. 2010. ‘Operation Payback’ Attacks Target MasterCard and PayPal Sites to Avenge WikiLeaks. New York Times.
28. Mayer-Schonberger, V. 2009. Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton University Press.
29. M.G. 2010. A Blizzard of protest over privacy. Economist.
30. Millen, D. R., and Patterson, J. F. 2003. Identity disclosure and the creation of social capital. In Proc. of CHI, 720–721.
31. Millen, D. R. 2000. Community portals and collective goods: Conversation archives as an information resource. HICSS.
32. Naaman, M.; Boase, J.; and Lai, C. 2010. Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams. In Proc. of CSCW, 189–192.
33. Poole, C. 2010. The case for anonymity online. TED2010.
34. Rains, S. 2007. The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research 34(1):100.
35. Ren, Y.; Kraut, R. E.; and Kiesler, S. forthcoming. Encouraging commitment in online communities. In Kraut, R., and Resnick, P., eds., Evidence-based social design: Mining the social sciences to build online communities. MIT Press.
36. Rosen, J. 2010. The web means the end of forgetting. The New York Times.
37. Rutkoff, A. 2007. With ‘LOLcats’ Internet Fad, Anyone Can Get In on the Joke. Wall Street Journal 25.
38. Short, J.; Williams, E.; and Christie, B. 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley London.
39. Shuman, P. 2007. Fox 11 investigates: ‘anonymous’. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNO6G4ApJQY.
40. Simmel, G. 1957. Fashion. Am. J. of Soc. 62(6):541–558.
41. Smith, M., and Harper, D. 1995. Animal signals: models and terminology. Journal of Theoretical Biology 177(3):305–311.
42. Sorgatz, R. 2009. Macroanonymous is the new microfamous. http://fimoculous.com/archive/post-5738.cfm.
43. Suler, J. 2005. The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 2(2):184–188.
44. Szabo, G., and Huberman, B. A. 2010. Predicting the popularity of online content. Commun. ACM 53:80–88.
45. Tanis, M., and Postmes, T. 2007. Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior 23(2):955–970.
46. Thompsen, P. A., and Ahn, D. 1992. To be or not to be: An exploration of e-prime, copula deletion and flaming in electronic mail. Et Cetera: A Review of General Semantics 146–164.