Emerging personalized home rehabilitation: Integrating service with interface

Medical Instrumentation: Accessibility and Usability Considerations

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 355-372

  Feng, Xin ^a   Winters, Jack M ^a  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85130018540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Greshman G.E., Duncan P.W., Stason W.B. et al., Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral and Patient Management, Clinical practice guidelines, Aspen Publ., Gaithersburg, 1996, see also http://www.ninds.nih.gov/health_and_medical/pubs/ poststrokerehab.htm.
2. Winters, J.M. and Herman, W., Report of the Workshop on Home Care Technologies for the 21st Century, Technical Report HCTR-10-v1.0, Catholic University of America, Washington, 1999, 96 p., see also http://www.eng.mu.edu/wintersj/HCTWorkshop.
3. Winters, J.M., TeleRehabilitation research: emerging opportunities, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 4, 287-320, 2002.
4. Taub, E. and Crago, J.E., Behavioral plasticity following central nervous system damage in monkeys and man, in Julesz, B. and Kovacs, I., Eds., Maturational Windows and Adult Cortical Plasticity, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1995.
5. Wolf, S.L., Lecraw, D.E., Barton, L.A., and Jann, B.B. Force use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients, Exp. Neurol, 104, 125-132, 1989.
6. Taub, E. and Wolf, S.L., Constraint-Induced Movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients, Top. Stroke Rehabil., 3, 38-61, 1997.
7. Reinkensmeyer, D., Lum, P., and Winters, J.M., Emerging technologies for improving access to movement therapy following neurologic injury, in Emerging and Accessible Telecommunications, Information and Healthcare Technologies, Winters, J.M., Robinson, C., Simpson, R., and Vanderheiden, G., Eds., RESNA Press, Arlington, VA, 2001.
8. Volpe, B., Krebs, H., Hogan, N., Edelstein, L., Diels, C., and Aisen M., A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation, Neurology, 54, 1938-44, 2000.
9. Lum, P.S., Burgar, C.G., and Shor, P. Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 12(2), 186-194, 2004.
10. Adamovich, S., Merians, A., Boian, R., Tremaine, M., Burdea, G., Recce, M., and Poizner, H., A virtual reality based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke, presence, Special Issue on Virtual Rehabilitation, 14(2), 161-174, 2005.
11. Holden, M.K., Dyar, T., Dayan-Cimadoro, L., Schwamm, L., and Bizzi, E., Virtual environment training in the home via telerehabilitation, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 85(8), E12, 2004.
12. Winters, J.M., Harris, G., Schmit, B., and Scheidt, R., Report of the Workshop on Innovations in Neurorehabilitation. Future Possibilities for Technology-Assisted Neuromotor Assessment and Movement Therapy, Milwaukee, 2001, http://www.eng.mu.edu/ rehab/falk-workshop-sum.htm.
13. Winters, J.M. and Winters, J.M., A telehomecare model for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes, J. Telemed. E-Health, 10, 200-212, 2004.
14. Zhang, C., Yu, Z., and Chin, C.-Y., Context-aware infrastructure for personalized healthcare, The International Workshop on Personalized Health, IOS Press, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
15. Wang, Y. and Winters, J.M., A dynamic neuro-fuzzy model providing bio-state estimation and prognosis prediction for wearable intelligent assistants, J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., 2005 (in press).
16. The Bandwidth Report, see also http://www.websiteoptimization.com/bw/0509/.
17. W3C, XML Linking Language (XLink) Version 1.0, see also http://www.w3.org/ TR/xlink/.
18. W3C, XML Pointer Language (XPointer) Version 1.0, see also http://www.w3.org/ TR/WD-xptr.
19. W3C, XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0, see also http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.
20. W3C, XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition, see also http://www.w3.org/ TR/xmlschema-1/.
21. W3C, XForms 1.0, see also http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/.
22. Gottschalk, K., Graham, S., Kreger, H., and Snell, J., Introduction to Web services architecture, IBM Syst. J., 41(2), 2002.
23. W3C, Semantic Web, see also http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
24. Vanderheiden, G. and Zimmermann, G., State of the science: access to information technologies, in Emerging and Accessible Telecommunications, Information and Healthcare Technologies, Winters, J.M., Robinson, C., Simpson, R., Vanderheiden, G., Eds., RESNA Press, Arlington, VA, 2002.
25. Health Level 7 Standard, see also http://www.hl7.org/.
26. SNOMED Clinical Terms (CT), see also http://www.snomed.org/.
27. Korhonen, I., Pärkkä, J., and van Gils, M., Health monitoring in the home of the future: infrastructure and usage models for wearable sensors, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol., 22(3), 66-73, 2003.
28. Winters, J.M., Wang, Y., and Winters, J.M., Wearable Sensors and Telerehabilitation: Integrating Intelligent Telerehabilitation Assistants With a Model for Optimizing Home Therapy, IEEE/EMBS Magazine, Special Issue on Wearable Medical Technologies, 22, June 2003, pp. 56-65.
29. Lymberis A., Smart wearable systems for personalized health management: current R&D and future challenges, Proc. 25th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS, Cancun, Mexico, 2003.
30. Gaudiosi, J., New Systems Give Games New Life, Video Store, 23(48), 8, 33, 2001.
31. Microsoft Xbox, see also http://www.xbox.com/.
32. Levander, M., Where Does Fantasy End?, Time, June 4, 2001, p. 22.
33. Chang, D., Haptics: gaming's new sensation, Computer, 35(8), 84-86, 2002.
34. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Medical Device Advice, see also http://www.fda.gov/ cdrh/devadvice/3132.html.
35. Bach-y-Rita, P., Conceptual issues relevant to present and future neurologic rehabilitation, in Levin, H. and Grafman, J., Eds., Neuroplasticity and Reorganization of Function after Brain Injury, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000, pp. 357-379.
36. IEEE 1073 Medical Device Communications Standard, see http://www.ieee1073.org/.
37. Nichols, J. and Myers, B.A., Automatically generating interfaces for multi-device environments, Ubicomp 2003 Workshop on Multi-Device Interfaces for Ubiquitous Peripheral Interaction, October, 2003, Seattle, WA.
38. Abrams, M. et al., UIML: an appliance-independent XML user interface language, WWWS Conference, May 1999, Toronto, Canada.
39. American National Standards Institute, (ANSI)/InterNational Committee for Information Technoloy Standards, (INCITS) 389-393 2005 Standard, August, 2005, Washington, D.C., see also http://www. incits. org/tc_home/ v2.htm.
40. Vanderheiden, G., Zimmermann, G., and Trewin, S., Interface Sockets, Remote Consoles, and Natural Language Agents: A V2 URC Standards Whitepaper, see http://www.myurc.com/.
41. Microsoft DirectX standard, see also http://www.microsoft.com/DirectX.
42. Johnson, L.M. and Winters, J.M., Target Tracking Patterns Using Rehabilitation Interfaces, BMES, 2005 (in press).
43. Johnson, M.J., Trickey, M., Brauer E., and Feng, X., TheraDrive: a new stroke therapy concept for home-based computer-assisted motivating rehabilitation, Proc. IEEE/EMBS, San Francisco, CA, 2004.
44. Mahoney, F.I., Barthel, D.W., Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md. State Med. J. 14, 61-5, 1965.
45. Feng, X. and Winters, J.M., UniTherapy: a computer-assisted motivating neurorehabilitation platform for teleassessment and remote therapy, Proc. Int. Congr. Rehabil. Robotics (ICORR), 4 p, 2005.
46. Feng, X. and Winters, J.M., Progress towards a service-oriented universal access telerehabilitation platform, Proc. Int. Congr. Rehabil. Robotics (ICORR), 4 p, 2005.
47. Koutikias, V.G., Meletiadis, S.L., and Maglavera, N., WAP-based Personalized Healthcare Systems. Health Inf. J., 7(3-4), 183-189, 2001.
48. Yao, J., Schmitz, R., and Warren, S.A. Wearable point-of-care system for home use that incorporates plug-and-play and wireless standards, IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 9(3), 2005.