A telehomecare model for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 200-212

  Winters, Jack M ^a   Winters, Jill M ^b  

^a Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University   (United States)

^b MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; BIO-SYSTEMS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; EMPIRICAL FINDINGS; KEY COMPONENT; NURSING CURRICULA; OPTIMIZATION PROCESS; REHABILITATION OUTCOMES; TELEHEALTH; TELEHOMECARE; TELEREHABILITATION; WEAK LINKS;

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CURRICULA; MEDICAL COMPUTING; PATIENT REHABILITATION;

OPTIMIZATION;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; REHABILITATION; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; REHABILITATION; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WISCONSIN;

EID: 66749163592     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.200     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Rosen MJ, Winters JM, Lauderdale D. State of the Science Conference: Telerehabilitation. In: Winters JM, Robinson C, Simpson R, et al., eds. Emerging and accessible telecommunications, information and healthcare technologies. Arlington: RESNA Press, 2002;220-245.
2. Winters JM. Telerehabilitation research: emerging possibilities. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2002;4:287-320.
3. Granger CV, Brownscheidle CM. Outcome measurement in medical rehabilitation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995;11:262-268.
4. Davies AR, Doyle MA, Lansky D, et al. Outcomes assessment in clinical settings: a consensus statement on principles and best practices in project management. In: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Commission, 1994:6-16.
5. American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to physical therapy practice, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association, 2001.
6. Bashshur R. Telemedicine effects: Cost, quality and access. J Med Syst 1995;19:81-91.
7. Winters JM, Herman W. Report of the Workshop on Home Care Technologies for the 21st Century. Tech. Rep. HCTR-10-v1.0. Washington DC: Cathol. Univ. Am., 2000. Available at http://www.eng.mu.edu/wintersj/ HCTWorkshop, 2000.
8. Winters JM. Emerging rehabilitative telehealthcare anywhere: Was the homecare technologies workshop visionary? In: Winters JM, Robinson C, Simpson R, et al., eds. Emerging and accessible telecommunications, information and healthcare technologies. Arlington: RESNA Press, 2002:95-111.
9. Brandt EN, Pope AM, eds. Enabling America. Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington: National Academy Press, 1997.
10. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Neurological rehabilitation: optimizing motor performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.
11. Armstrong TJ. Tools for assessment of ergonomic aspects of telecommunication equipment. In: Winters JM, Robinson C, Simpson R, et al., eds. Emerging and accessible telecommunications, information and health technologies. Arlington: RESNA Press, 2002:29-36.
12. Nielsen J. Usability engineering. Boston: AP Professional, 1993.
13. Card S, Moran T, Newell A. The model human processor. In: Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J, eds. Handbook of perception and human performance, vol 2. New York: Wiley, 1986.
14. Lathan CE, Kinsella A, Rosen MJ, et al. Aspects of human factors engineering in home telemedicine and telerehabilitation systems. Telemed J 1999;5:169-175.
15. Winters JM. Mobile telerehabilitative healthcare technologies. In: Rosen MJ, Lauderdale D, eds. Proceedings of the state of the science conference on telerehabilitation and application of virtual reality. Washington: NRH Press, 2001:102-108.
16. Winters JM, Wang Y, Winters JM. Wearable sensors and telerehabilitation: Integrating intelligent telerehabilitation assistants with a model for optimizing home therapy. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2003;22:56-65.
17. Winters JM, Lathan C, Sukthankar S, et al. Human performance and rehabilitation technologies. In: Winters JM, Crago PE, eds. Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000:493-551.
18. Winters JM, Feng X, Wang Y, Johnson LM, Foil J. Progress toward universal interface technologies for telerehabilitation. IEEE Eng Med Biol 2004 (in press).
19. Miller NH, Hill M, Kottke T, et al. The multilevel compliance challenge: recommendations for a call to action. A statement for healthcare professionals. Circulation 1997;95:1085-1090.
20. Kyngas H. Motivation as a crucial predictor of good compliance in adolescents with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Nurs Pract 2002;8:336-341.
21. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, et al. The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of a stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke 2002;33:444-448.
22. McDaniel J. Physical disability and human behavior. New York: Permagon Press, 1976.
23. Bandura A. Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
24. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman, 1997.
25. Bach-y-Rita P. Conceptual issues relevant to present and future neurologic rehabilitation. In: Levin H & Grafman J, eds. Neuroplasticity and reorganization of function after brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000;357-379.
26. Reinkensmeyer D, Lum P, Winters JM. Emerging technologies for improving access to movement therapy following neurologic injury. In: Winters JM, Robinson C, Simpson R, et al., eds. Emerging and accessible telecommunications, information and healthcare technologies. Arlington: RESNA Press, 2002: 136-150.
27. Ellsworth C, Winters JM. An innovative system to enhance upper-extremity stroke rehabilitation, Joint IEEE-EMBS/BMES Conf., Houston, October, 2002.
28. Stanislaus AA, Winters JM. Use of remote functional assessment tools to enhance rehabilitation research and practice. Joint EMBS/BMES Conf., Houston, October, 2002.
29. Wang Y, Winters JM. An event-driven dynamic recurrent neuro-fuzzy system for adaptive prognosis in rehabilitation, Proc. IEEE/EMBS, Cancun, October, 2003:4.
30. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2004 update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2003.
31. Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2001;104:2996-3007.
32. Moser DK. Heart failure management: optimal health care delivery programs. Annu Rev Nurs Res 2000;18: 91-126.
33. Shaw DK, Sparks KE, Jennings HS. Transtelephonic exercise monitoring: a review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1998;18:263-270.