Performance-Based Seismic Design and Evaluation of Building Structures

Earthquake Engineering for Structural Design

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 5-

  Kunnath, Sashi K ^a  

^a University of California Davis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85128544067     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. ATC 3-06 (1978). Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
2. ATC-40 (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Report SSC 96-01, California Seismic Safety Commission, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
3. Cheok, G., Stone, W., and Kunnath, S.K. (1998). Seismic response of precast concrete frames with hybrid connections. ACI Struct. J. 95(5), 527-539.
4. Chopra, A. (2001). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, New York.
5. Chopra, A. and Goel, R. (2001). Direct displacement-based design: use of inelastic vs. elastic design spectra. Earthquake Spectra 17(1), 47-64.
6. Chopra, A. and Goel, R. (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31 (3), 561-582.
7. Clough, R. and Penzien, J. (1993). Dynamics of Structures. McGraw-Hill, New York.
8. Cornell, C.A. (1996). Calculating building seismic performance reliability: a basis for multilevel design norms. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2122. Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam.
9. Cornell, C.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2000). Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 3(2), 1.
10. Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O., and Foutch, D.A. (2002). Probabilistic basis for 200 sac federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 128(4), 526-533.
11. Fajfar, P. (1999). Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. In Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. Vol. 28, pp. 979-993.
12. Fajfar, P. and Gasperic, P. (1996). The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 28(1), 31-46.
13. Fajfar, P. and Krawinkler, H., eds (1997). Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam.
14. FEMA-350 (2000). Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. Developed by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
15. FEMA-356 (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
16. Freeman, S.A. (1978). Prediction of response of concrete buildings to severe earthquake motion. Douglas McHenry International Symposium on Concrete and Concrete Structures, ACI SP-55. American Concrete Institute, Detroit MI. pp. 589-605.
17. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (2000). Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake Spectra 16(2), 367-392.
18. Haukaas, T. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2003). Finite element reliability and sensitivity analysis in performance-based engineering. Proceedings, ASCE Structures Congress, Seattle, WA.
19. IBC (2000). International Building Code. International Code Council, ICBO, Whittier, CA.
20. Krawinkler, H. (1997). Research issues in performance based seismic engineering. In Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes (P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds). Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam.
21. Krawinkler, H. and Miranda, E. (2004). Performance-based earthquake engineering. In Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering (Y. Bozorgnia and V.V. Bertero, eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
22. Kunnath, S.K. (2004). IDASS: inelastic dynamic analysis of structural systems. http://cee.engr.ucdavis.edu/ faculty/kunnath/idass.htm.
23. Kunnath, S.K. (2004). Identification of modal combinations for nonlinear static analysis of building structures. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 19, 282-295.
24. Kunnath, S.K., Mander, J.B., and Lee, F. (1997). Parameter identification for degrading and pinched hysteretic structural concrete systems. Eng. Struct. 19(3), 224-232.
25. Kunnath, S.K., Reinhorn, A.M., and Lobo, R.F. (1992). IDARC Version 3.0 - A Program for Inelastic Damage Analysis of RC Structures. Technical Report NCEER-92-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, SUNY, Buffalo, NY.
26. Luco, N. and Cornell, A. (1998). Effects of random connection fractures on the demands and reliability for a 3-story pre-Northridge SMRF structure. Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA.
27. Mahaney, J.A., Paret, T.F., Kehoe, B.E., and Freeman, S. (1993). The capacity spectrum method for evaluating structural response during the Loma Prieta earthquake. Proceedings of the National Earthquake Conference, Memphis, TN.
28. May, P.J. (2002). Barriers to Adoption and Implementation of PBEE Innovations. Technical Report PEER 2002/20, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
29. Miranda, E. and Aslani, H. (2003). Probabilistic Response Assessment for Building Specific Loss Estimation. Report PEER 2003/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
30. Moehle, J.P. (1992) Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes. EERI Spectra, 8(3), 403-428.
31. Moehle, J.P. (1996). Displacement based seismic design criteria. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico.
32. OpenSees (2003). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
33. Park, R. and Paulay, T. (1976). Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons, New York
34. Porter, K.A. (2002). An overview of PEER's performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. Proceedings, Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), July 6-9, 2003, San Francisco, CA.
35. Priestley, M.J.N. and Calvi, G.M. (1997). Concepts and procedures for direct-displacement based design. In Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes (P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler eds). Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, pp. 171-181.
36. Reinhorn, A.M. (1997). Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations. In Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes (P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds). Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam. pp. 277-287.
37. SEAOC (1995). Vision 2000: Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), Sacramento, CA.
38. Sivaselvan, M.V. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2000). Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures. J. Eng. Mech. 126(6), 633-640.
39. Uang, C.-M. (1991). Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 117(1), 19-28.
40. Uang, C.-M. and Bertero, V.V. (1991). UBC seismic serviceability regulations: critical review. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 117(7), 2055-2068.
41. Umemura, H. and Takizawa, H. (1982). Dynamic Response of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Structural Engineering Documents 2, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), Switzerland.
42. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31(3), 491-514.