Innovative questionnaire assessment methods to increase cross-country comparability

Handbook of International Large-Scale Assessment: Background, Technical Issues, and Methods of Data Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 277-285

  Kyllonen, Patrick C ^a   Bertling, Jonas P ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85128146863     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (15)

1. Bartram, D. 2013. Scalar equivalence of OPQ32: Big five profiles of 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 61-83.
2. Bogg, T. and Roberts, B. 2013. The case for conscientiousness: Evidence and implications for a personality trait marker of health and longevity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45, 278-288.
3. Buckley, J. 2008. Survey Context Effects in Anchoring Vignettes. Working Paper 822. (retrieved from http://polmeth.wustl.edu/mediaDetail.php?docId=822 on 1 March 2013. Washington University in St. Louis.
4. Buckley, J. 2009. Cross-National Response Styles in International Educational Assessments: Evidence from PISA 2006. https://edsurveys.rti.org/PISA/documents/Buckley_PISAresponsestyle.pdf
5. Freedman, D.A. 1999. Ecological inference and the ecological fallacy, In N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 6: 4027-4030. Oxford: Elsevier.
6. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
7. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., and Gupta, V. (Eds.) 2004. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. King, G. and Wand, J. 2007. Comparing incomparable survey responses: New tools for anchoring vignettes. Political Analysis, 15, 46-66.
9. King, G., Murray, C.J.L., Salomon, J. A., and Tandon, A. 2004. Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98, 191-207.
10. McRae, R.R. 2002. NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In R. R. McCrae and J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality across Cultures (pp. 105-125). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
11. Mickelson, R.A. 1990. The attitude-achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44-61.
12. Mõttus, R., Allik, J., Realo, A., Rossier, J., Zecca, G., Ah-Kion, J. et al. 2012. The effect of response style on self-reported conscientiousness across 20 countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1423-1436.
13. Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalek, A.M., Adam, N.A., Adamovova, L., Ahn, C.-K., Ahn, H.-N. et al. 2005. National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310, 96-100.
14. Van de Gaer, E., Grisay, A., Schulz, W., and Gebhardt, E. 2012. The reference group effect: An explanation of the paradoxical relationship between academic achievement and self-confidence across countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(8), 1205-1228.
15. Wand, J., King, G., and Lau, O. 2011. Anchors: Software for anchoring vignettes data. Journal of Statistical Software, 42, 1-25.