The Semantic Publishing and Referencing Ontologies

Law, Governance and Technology Series

Volumn 15, Issue , 2014, Pages 121-193

  Peroni, Silvio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bibliographic Record; Bibliographic Reference; Citation Context; Ontology Module; Reference Ontology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85125953642     PISSN: 23521902     EISSN: 23521910     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04777-5_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Accomazzi, A., and R. Dave. 2011. Semantic interlinking of resources in the virtual observatory era. ArXiv:1103.5958. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.5958. Accessed 30 July 2013.
2. Aranguren, M. E., E. Antezana, M. Kuiper, and R. Stevens. 2008. Ontology design patterns for bio-ontologies: A case study on the cell cycle ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 9 (5): S1. (London, United Kingdom: BioMed Central). doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-S5-S1.
3. Attwood, T. K., D. B. Kell, P. McDermott, J. Marsh, S. R. Pettifer, and D. Thorne. 2010. Utopia documents: Linking scholarly literature with research data. Bioinformatics 26 (18): 568–574. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq383.
4. Barabucci, G., L. Cervone, M. Palmirani, S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. 2009. Multi-layer markup and ontological structures in Akoma Ntoso. In Proceeding of the international workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems II (AICOL-II), lecture notes in computer science 6237, ed. P. Casanovas, U. Pagallo, G. Sartor, and G. Ajani, 133–149. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_9.
5. Berjon, R., T. Leithead, E. D. Navara, E. O’Connor, and S. Pfeiffer. 2013. HTML5: A vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML. W3C candidate recommendation 6 August 2013. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
6. Bojars, U., and J. G. Breslin. 2010. SIOC core ontology specification. 25 March 2010. http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
7. Brickley, D., and L. Miller. 2010. FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98. Namespace document, 9 August 2010-Marco Polo Edition. http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
8. Casanovas, P., N. Casellas, C. Tempich, D. Vrandecic, and R. Benjamins. 2007. OPJK and DILI-GENT: Ontology modeling in a distributed environment. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2): 171–186. doi:10.1007/s10506-007-9036-2.
9. Ciccarese, P., and T. Groza. 2011. Ontology of Rhetorical Blocks (ORB). Editor’s draft, 5 June 2011. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/orb/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
10. Ciccarese, P., and S. Peroni. 2013. The collections ontology: Creating and handling collections in OWL 2 DL frameworks. To appear in Semantic Web–Interoperability, Usability, Applicability. doi:10.3233/SW-130121.
11. Ciccarese, P., E. Wu, J. Kinoshita, G. Wong, M. Ocana, A. Ruttenberg, and T. Clark. 2008. The SWAN biomedical discourse ontology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41 (5): 739–751. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.04.010.
12. Ciccarese, P., D. Shotton, S. Peroni, and T. Clark. 2011. CiTO + SWAN: The web semantics of bibliographic records, citations, evidence and discourse relationships. To appear in Semantic Web–Interoperability, Usability, Applicability. doi:10.3233/SW-130098.
13. Cimiano, P., and J. Volker. 2005. Text2Onto—A framework for ontology learning and data-driven change discovery. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on applications of natural language to information systems (NLDB05), lecture notes in computer science 3513, ed. A. Montoyo, R. Munoz, and E. Metais, 227–238. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/11428817_21.
14. Crofts, N., M. Doerr, T. Gill, S. Stead, and M. Stiff. 2011. Definition of the CIDOC conceptual reference model. Version 5.0.4, November 2011. ICOM/CIDOC CRM special interest group. http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.4.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
15. D’Arcus, B., and F. Giasson. 2009. Bibliographic ontology specification. Specification document, 4 November 2009. http://bibliontology.com/specification. Accessed 30 July 2013.
16. Dattolo, A., A. Di Iorio, S. Duca, A. A. Feliziani, and F. Vitali. 2007. Structural patterns for descriptive documents. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on web engineering 2007 (ICWE 2007), lecture notes in computer science 4607, ed. L. Baresi, P. Fraternali, and G. Houben, 421–426. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73597-7_35.
17. De Waard, A. 2010a. From proteins to fairytales: Directions in semantic publishing. IEEE Intelligent Systems 25 (2): 83–88. doi:10.1109/MIS.2010.49.
18. De Waard, A. 2010b. Medium-grained document structure. http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure/models/medium. Accessed 30 July 2013.
19. Di Iorio, A., D. Gubellini, and F. Vitali. 2005. Design patterns for document substructures. Proceedings of the extreme markup languages 2005. Rockville: Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://conferences.idealliance.org/extreme/html/2005/Vitali01/EML2005Vitali01.html. Accessed 30 July 2013.
20. Di Iorio, A., S. Peroni, F. Poggi, and F. Vitali. 2012. A first approach to the automatic recognition of structural patterns in XML documents. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM symposium on Document Engineering (DocEng 2012), 85–94. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2361354.2361374.
21. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 2012. DCMI metadata terms. DCMI recommendation. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/. Accessed 30July 2013.
22. Gangemi, A. 2010a. Submission: Participation. http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submi ssions:Participation. Accessed 30 July 2013.
23. Gangemi, A. 2010b. Submission: Region. http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions: Region. Accessed 30 July 2013.
24. Gangemi, A. 2010c. Submission: Sequence. http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissi-ons:Sequence. Accessed 30 July 2013.
25. Gangemi, A. 2010d. Submission: TimeIndexedSituation. http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:TimeIndexedSituation. Accessed 30 July 2013.
26. Gangemi, A., S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. 2010. Literal reification. Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Pattern 2010 (WOP 2010), CEUR workshop proceedings 671, 65–66. Aachen: CEUR-WS.org. http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-671/pat04.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
27. Garlik, S. H., and A. Seaborne. 2013. SPARQL 1.1 query language. W3C recommendation 21 March 2013. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
28. Groza, T., K. Möller, S. Handschuh, D. Trif, and S. Decker. 2007. SALT: Weaving the claim web. In Proceedings of 6th International Semantic Web Conference and of the 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007 +ASWC 2007), lecture notes in computer science 4825, ed. K. Aberer, K. Choi, N. F. Noy, D. Allemang, K. Lee, L. J. B. Nixon, J. Golbeck, P. Mika, D. Maynard, R. Mizoguchi, G. Schreiber, and P. Cudré-Mauroux, 197–210. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_15.
29. Groza, T., S. Handschuh, K. Möller, and S. Decker. 2007. SALT–semantically annotated LaTeX for scientific publications. In Proceedings of the fourth European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007), lecture notes in computer science 4519, ed. E. Franconi, M. Kifer, and W. May, 518–532. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72667-8_37.
30. Groza, T., S. Handschuh, and S. Decker. 2011. Capturing rhetoric and argumentation aspects within scientific publications. Journal on Data Semantics 15: 1–36. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22630-4_1.
31. Gruber, T. R. 1995. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 43 (5–6): 907–928. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081.
32. Guarino, N., and C. Welty. 2002. Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM 45 (2): 61–65. doi:10.1145/503124.503150.
33. Hammond, T. 2008. RDF site summary 1.0 modules: PRISM. http://nurture.nature.com/rss/modules/mod_prism.html. Accessed 30 July 2013.
34. Hayes, P., and C. Welty. 2006. Defining N-ary relations on the semantic web. W3C working group note 12 April 2006. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
35. Hobbs, J. R., and F. Pan. 2006. Time ontology in OWL. W3C working draft, 27 September 2006. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
36. Horridge, M., and P. Patel-Schneider. 2012. OWL 2 web ontology language Manchester syntax. 2nd ed. W3C working group note 11 December 2012. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
37. Horrocks, I., P. F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean. 2004. SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission 21 May 2004. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
38. Iannella, R. 2013. vCard ontology: For describing people and organisations. W3C working draft 24 September 2013. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
39. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 2009. Functional requirements for bibliographic records final report. International federation of library associations and institutions. http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
40. Kircz, J. G. 1991. Rhetorical structure of scientific articles: The case for argumentational analysis in information retrieval. Journal of Documentation 47 (4): 354–372. doi:10.1108/eb026884.
41. Masolo, C., L. Vieu, E. Bottazzi, C. Catenacci, R. Ferrario, A. Gangemi, and N. Guarino. 2004. Social roles and their descriptions. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on the principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR2004), 267–277. https://www.aaai.org/Papers/KR/2004/KR04-029.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
42. Miles, A., and S. Bechhofer. 2009. SKOS simple knowledge organization system reference. W3C recommendation 18 August 2009. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
43. Moller, K., S. Bechhofer, and T. Heath. 2009. Semantic web conference ontology. http://data.semanticweb.org/ns/swc/swc_2009-05-09.html. Accessed 30 July 2013.
44. Peroni, S., and D. Shotton. 2012. FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 17:33–43. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2012.08.001.
45. Peroni, S., E. Motta, and M. d’Aquin. 2008. Identifying key concepts in an ontology, through the integration of cognitive principles with statistical and topological measures. In Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC 2008), ed. J. Domingue and C. Anutariya. Berlin: Springer.
46. Picca, D., A. Gliozzo, and A. Gangemi. 2008. LMM: An OWL-DL MetaModel to represent heterogeneous lexical knowledge. Proceedings of the 6th Language Resource and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2008). Luxembourg: European Language Resources Association. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008/pdf/608_paper.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2013.
47. Presutti, V., and A. Gangemi. 2008. Content ontology design patterns as practical building blocks for web ontologies. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on conceptual modeling (ER 2008), lecture notes in computer science 5231, ed. Q. Li, S. Spaccapietra, E. S. K. Yu, and A. Olivé, 128–141. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87877-3_11.
48. Prud’hommeaux, E., and G. Carothers. 2013. Turtle, Terse RDF triple language. W3C candidate recommendation 19 February 2013. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/. Accessed 30 July 2013.
49. Rector, A. 2003. Modularisation of domain ontologies implemented in description logics and related formalisms including OWL. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2003), ed. J. H. Gennari, B. W. Porter, and Y. Gil. New York: ACM.
50. Schneider, J., T. Groza, and A. Passant. 2011. A review of argumentation for the social semantic web. Semantic Web–Interoperability, Usability, Applicability 4 (2): 159–218. doi:10.3233/SW-2012-0073.
51. Shotton, D. 2009. Semantic publishing: The coming revolution in scientific journal publishing. Learned Publishing 22 (2): 85–94. doi:10.1087/2009202.
52. Shotton, D. 2010. CiTO, the citation typing ontology. Journal of Biomedical Semantics 1 (1): S6. doi:10.1186/2041-1480-1-S1-S6.
53. Shotton, D., C. Caton, and G. Klyne. 2010. Ontologies for sharing, ontologies for use. http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/2010/01/22/ontologies-for-sharing/. Accessed 12 March 2012.
54. Toulmin, S. 1959. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (ISBN 0521827485).
55. Varma, P. 2010. Project documents ontology. http://vocab.deri.ie/pdo. Accessed 30 July 2013.
56. Walsh, N. (2010). DocBook 5: The definitive guide. Sebastopol: O’Really Media. Version 1.0.3. (ISBN: 0596805029).
57. Wan, S., C. Paris, and R. Dale. 2010. Supporting browsing-specific information needs: Introducing the citation-sensitive in-browser summariser. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 8 (2–3): 196–202. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2010.03.002.