SemEval-2015 Task 1: Paraphrase and Semantic Similarity in Twitter (PIT)

SemEval 2015 - 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, co-located with the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2015 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1-11

  Xu, Wei ^a   Callison Burch, Chris ^a   Dolan, William B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

BASELINE SYSTEMS; DATA BASELINE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING; PARAPHRASE CORPUS; PARAPHRASE IDENTIFICATIONS; PEARSON CORRELATION; RESEARCH AREAS; SEMANTIC EQUIVALENCES; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; TEXTUAL SIMILARITIES;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85122039577     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Agirre, E., Diab, M., Cer, D., and Gonzalez-Agirre, A. (2012). Semeval-2012 task 6: A pilot on semantic textual similarity. In Proceedings of SemEval.
2. Artstein, R. and Poesio, M. (2008). Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4).
3. Bertero, D. and Fung, P. (2015). HLTC-HKUST: A neural network paraphrase classifier using translation metrics, semantic roles and lexical similarity features. In Proceedings of SemEval.
4. Biçici, E. and Way, A. (2014). RTM-DCU: Referential translation machines for semantic similarity. In Proceedings of SemEval.
5. Biçici, E. and Yuret, D. (2014). Optimizing instance selection for statistical machine translation with feature decay algorithms. IEEE/ACM Transactions On Audio, Speech, and Language Processing (TASLP).
6. Bicici, E. (2015). RTM-DCU: Predicting semantic similarity with referential translation machines. In Proceedings of SemEval.
7. Bjerva, J., Bos, J., van der Goot, R., and Nissim, M. (2014). The meaning factory: Formal semantics for recognizing textual entailment and determining semantic similarity. In Proceedings of SemEval.
8. Blacoe, W. and Lapata, M. (2012). A comparison of vector-based representations for semantic composition. In Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL.
9. Chen, D. L. and Dolan, W. B. (2011). Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation. In Proceedings of ACL.
10. Das, D. and Smith, N. A. (2009). Paraphrase identification as probabilistic quasi-synchronous recognition. In Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP.
11. Derczynski, L., Ritter, A., Clark, S., and Bontcheva, K. (2013). Twitter part-of-speech tagging for all: Overcoming sparse and noisy data. In Proceedings of RANLP.
12. Dolan, B., Quirk, C., and Brockett, C. (2004). Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources. In Proceedings of COLING.
13. Eyecioglu, A. and Keller, B. (2015). ASOBEK: Twitter paraphrase identification with simple overlap features and SVMs. In Proceedings of SemEval.
14. Fellbaum, C. (2010). WordNet. In Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer.
15. Fernando, S. and Stevenson, M. (2008). A semantic similarity approach to paraphrase detection. Computational Linguistics UK (CLUK) 11th Annual Research Colloquium.
16. Francis, W. N. and Kucera, H. (1979). Brown corpus manual. Technical report, Brown University. Department of Linguistics.
17. Glavaš, G., Karan, M., Šnajder, J., Bašić, B. D., Vulić, I., and Moens, M.-F. (2015). TKLBLIIR: Detecting Twitter paraphrases with TweetingJay. In Proceedings of SemEval.
18. Guo, W. and Diab, M. (2012). Modeling sentences in the latent space. In Proceedings of ACL.
19. Guo, W., Liu, W., and Diab, M. (2014). Fast tweet retrieval with compact binary codes. In Proceedings of COLING.
20. Han, L., Kashyap, A., Finin, T., Mayfield, J., and Weese, J. (2013). UMBC EBIQUITY-CORE: Semantic textual similarity systems. In Proceedings of *SEM.
21. Hassan, S. and Mihalcea, R. (2011). Semantic relatedness using salient semantic analysis. In Proceedings of AAAI.
22. Hovy, E., Marcus, M., Palmer, M., Ramshaw, L., and Weischedel, R. (2006). OntoNotes: the 90% solution. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL.
23. Islam, A. and Inkpen, D. (2007). Semantic similarity of short texts. In Proceedings of RANLP.
24. Ji, Y. and Eisenstein, J. (2013). Discriminative improvements to distributional sentence similarity. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
25. Karampatsis, R.-M. (2015). CDTDS: Predicting paraphrases in Twitter via support vector regression. In Proceedings of SemEval.
26. Kornai, A., Makrai, M., Nemeskey, D., and Recski, G. (2015). Extending 4lang using monolingual dictionaries. Unpublished manuscript.
27. Madnani, N. and Dorr, B. J. (2010). Generating phrasal and sentential paraphrases: A survey of data-driven methods. Computational Linguistics.
28. Madnani, N., Tetreault, J., and Chodorow, M. (2012). Re-examining machine translation metrics for paraphrase identification. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT.
29. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., and Strapparava, C. (2006). Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In Proceedings of AAAI.
30. Nenkova, A. and Vanderwende, L. (2005). The impact of frequency on summarization. Technical report, Microsoft Research. MSR-TR-2005-101.
31. Ngoc Phuoc An Vo, S. M. and Popescu, O. (2015). FBK-HLT: An application of semantic textual similarity for paraphrase and semantic similarity in Twitter. In Proceedings of SemEval.
32. O'Connor, B., Krieger, M., and Ahn, D. (2010). Tweetmotif: Exploratory search and topic summarization for Twitter. In Proceedings of ICWSM.
33. Petrović, S., Osborne, M., and Lavrenko, V. (2012). Using paraphrases for improving first story detection in news and twitter. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT.
34. Qiu, L., Kan, M.-Y., and Chua, T.-S. (2006). Paraphrase recognition via dissimilarity significance classification. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
35. Ritter, A., Clark, S., and Etzioni, O. (2011). Named entity recognition in tweets: an experimental study. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
36. Robbins, H. (1985). Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments. In Herbert Robbins Selected Papers. Springer.
37. Rus, V., McCarthy, P. M., Lintean, M. C., McNamara, D. S., and Graesser, A. C. (2008). Paraphrase identification with lexico-syntactic graph subsumption. In Proceedings of FLAIRS.
38. Satyapanich, T., Gao, H., and Finin, T. (2015). Ebiquity: Paraphrase and semantic similarity in Twitter using skipgrams. In Proceedings of SemEval.
39. Socher, R., Huang, E. H., Pennin, J., Manning, C. D., and Ng, A. (2011). Dynamic pooling and unfolding recursive autoencoders for paraphrase detection. In Proceedings of NIPS.
40. Tran-Thanh, L., Stein, S., Rogers, A., and Jennings, N. R. (2012). Efficient crowdsourcing of unknown experts using multi-armed bandits. In Proceedings of ECAI.
41. van der Goot, R. and van Noord, G. (2015). ROB: Using semantic meaning to recognize paraphrases. In Proceedings of SemEval.
42. Vanderwende, L., Suzuki, H., Brockett, C., and Nenkova, A. (2007). Beyond SumBasic: Task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion. Information Processing & Management, 43.
43. Wan, S., Dras, M., Dale, R., and Paris, C. (2006). Using dependency-based features to take the para-farce out of paraphrase. In Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Workshop.
44. Wang, L., Dyer, C., Black, A. W., and Trancoso, I. (2013). Paraphrasing 4 microblog normalization. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
45. Xu, W. (2014). Data-Drive Approaches for Paraphrasing Across Language Variations. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, New York University.
46. Xu, W., Ritter, A., Callison-Burch, C., Dolan, W. B., and Ji, Y. (2014). Extracting lexically divergent paraphrases from Twitter. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 2(1).
47. Xu, W., Ritter, A., and Grishman, R. (2013). Gathering and generating paraphrases from twitter with application to normalization. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Building and Using Comparable Corpora.
48. Zanzotto, F. M., Pennacchiotti, M., and Tsioutsiouliklis, K. (2011). Linguistic redundancy in twitter. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
49. Zarrella, G., Henderson, J., Merkhofer, E. M., and Strickhart, L. (2015). MITRE: Seven systems for semantic similarity in tweets. In Proceedings of SemEval.
50. Zhao, J. and Lan, M. (2015). ECNU: Boosting performance for paraphrase and semantic similarity in Twitter by leveraging word embeddings. In Proceedings of SemEval.