TeamX: A Sentiment Analyzer with Enhanced Lexicon Mapping and Weighting Scheme for Unbalanced Data

8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2014 - co-located with the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2014, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 628-632

  Miura, Yasuhide ^a   Sakaki, Shigeyuki ^a   Hattori, Keigo ^a   Ohkuma, Tomoko ^a  

^a FUJI XEROX CO LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

LEXICAL INFORMATION; MACHINE LEARNERS; MAPPING SCHEME; SUBTASK; TEST RUNS; TEXT CATEGORIZATION; UNBALANCED DATA; WEIGHTING SCHEME;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 85122015259     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Eneko Agirre and Aitor Soroa. 2009. Personalizing PageRank for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of EACL 2009, pages 33–41.
2. Cem Akkaya, Janyce Wiebe, and Rada Mihalcea. 2009. Subjectivity word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2009, pages 190–199.
3. Enrique Amigó, Jorge Carrillo de Albornoz, Irina Chugur, Adolfo Corujo, Julio Gonzalo, Tamara Martín, Edgar Meij, Maarten de Rijke, and Damiano Spina. 2013. Overview of RepLab 2013: Evaluating online reputation monitoring systems. In CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop, Online Working Notes.
4. Stefano Baccianella, Andrea Esuli, and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2010. SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of LREC 2010, pages 2200–2204.
5. Rong-En Fan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Xiang-Rui Wang, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. In Journal of Machine Learning Research, volume 9, pages 1871–1874.
6. Christiane Fellbaum, editor. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press.
7. Guido Minnen, John Carroll, and Darren Pearce. 2001. Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3):207–223.
8. Saif Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, and Xiaodan Zhu. 2013. NRC-Canada: Building the state-of-the-art in sentiment analysis of tweets. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Semantic Evaluation Exercises (SemEval-2013), pages 321–327.
9. Preslav Nakov, Sara Rosenthal, Zornitsa Kozareva, Veselin Stoyanov, Alan Ritter, and Theresa Wilson. 2013. SemEval-2013 task 2: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Semantic Evaluation Exercises (SemEval-2013), pages 312–320.
10. Finn Årup Nielsen. 2011. A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. In Proceedings of the ESWC2011 Workshop on ‘Making Sense of Microposts’: Big things come in small packages, pages 93–98.
11. Olutobi Owoputi, Brendan O’Connor, Chris Dyer, Kevin Gimpel, Nathan Schneider, and Noah A. Smith. 2013. Improved part-of-speech tagging for online conversational text with word clusters. In Proceedings of NAACL 2013, pages 380–390.
12. Sara Rosenthal, Alan Ritter, Preslav Nakov, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2014. SemEval-2014 task 9: Sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of the eighth international workshop on Semantic Evaluation Exercises (SemEval-2014).
13. Philip Stone, Dexter Dunphy, Marshall Smith, and Daniel Ogilvie. 1966. General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press.
14. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003, pages 252–259.
15. Joseph Turian, Lev Ratinov, and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Word representations: A simple and general method for semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of ACL 2010, pages 384–394.
16. Julio Villena-Román and Janine García-Morera. 2013. TASS 2013 - Workshop on sentiment analysis at SEPLN 2013: An overview. In Proceedings of the TASS workshop at SEPLN 2013.
17. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP 2005, pages 347–354.