The pygmalion problem in early symbol use

Symbol Use and Symbolic Representation: Developmental and Comparative Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 47-67

  DeLoache, Judy S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85121566204     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Barrera, M. E., & Maurer, D. (1981). Recognition of mother's photographed face by the three-month-old. Child Development, 52, 714-716.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
3. Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meaning of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9, 200-204.
5. Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley.
6. Church, J. (1961). Language and the discovery of reality. New York: Random House.
7. Corballis, M. C. (1999). The gestural origins of language. American Scientist, 87, 138-145
8. Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001). Defining the cortical visual systems: "What", "where", and "how". Acta Psychologica, 107, 43-68.
9. Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.
10. DeLoache, J. S. (1995). Early symbolic understanding and use. In D. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 33 (pp. 65-114). New York: Academic Press
11. DeLoache, J. S., Pierroutsakos, S. L., & Troseth, G. (1996). The three R's of pictorial competence. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development (pp. 1-48). Bristol, PA: Jessica Kingsley.
12. DeLoache, J. S., Pierroutsakos, S. L., Uttal, D. H., Rosengren, K. S., & Gottleib, A. (1998). Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychological Science, 9, 205-210
13. DeLoache, J. S., Strauss, M. S., & Maynard, J. (1979). Picture perception in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 77-89.
14. DeLoache, J. S., Uttal, D. H., & Rosengren, K. S. (2003). Young children's scale errors offer evidence for two visual systems early in life. Unpublished manuscript.
15. Deregowski, J. (1989). Real space and represented space: Cross-cultural perspectives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 51-119.
16. Dirks, J. R., & Gibson, E. (1977). Infants' perception of similarity between live people and their photographs. Child Development, 48, 124-130.
17. Ganea, P., Butler, L., Preissler, M., Carey, S., & DeLoache, J. (2005). The onset of a symbolic interpretation of pictures. Research in progress, University of Virginia and Harvard University.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1971). The information available in pictures. Leonardo, 4, 27-35.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception^ Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Gibson, J. J. (1980). Foreword: A prefatory essay on the perception of surfaces versus the perception of markings on a surface. In M. A. Hagen (Ed.), The perception of pictures: Vol. 1 (pp. xi-xvii). New York: Academic Press.
21. Glover, S. (2002). Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 288-292.
22. Glover, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 3-78.
23. Gombrich, E. H. (1974). The visual image. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), Media and symbols: The forms of expression communication and education (pp. 241-270). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
25. Gregory, R. L. (1970). The intelligent eye. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1962). Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: A study of one child's performance. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 624-628.
27. Huttenlocher, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1978). Issues in the study of symbolic development. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology, Vol. 11. (pp. 98-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Ittelson, W. H. (1996). Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(2), 171-187.
29. Kennedy, J. M. (1974). A psychology of picture perception^ San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Kuhlmeier, V. A., & Boysen, S. T. (2001). The effect of response contingencies on scale model task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 300-306.
31. Kuhlmeier, V. A., & Boysen, S. T. (2002). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) recognize spatial and object correspondences between a scale model and its referent. Psychological Science, 13, 60-63.
32. Kuhlmeier, V. A., Boysen, S. T., & Mukobi, K. L. (1999). Scale-model comprehension by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 396-402.
33. Langer, S. K. K. (1942). Philosophy in a new key. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Murphy, C. M. (1978). Painting in the context of shared activity. Child Development, 49, 371-380.
36. Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37. Ninio, A., & Bruner, J. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labeling. Journal of Child Language, 5, 1-15.
38. Peirce, C. S. (1903). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. Reprinted in J. Buchler (Ed.), The philosophical writings of Peirce (1955) (pp. 98-119). New York: Dover Books.
39. Pepperberg, I. M. (1999). The Alex Studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. London: MIT Press.
41. Pierroutsakos, S. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (2003). Infants' manual exploration of objects varying in realism. Infancy, 4, 141-156.
42. Potter, M. C. (1979). Mundane symbolism: The relations among objects, names, and ideas. In N. R. Smith & M. B. Franklin (Eds.), Symbolic functioning in childhood (pp. 41-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Preissler, M. A., & Carey, S. (2004). Do both pictures and words function as symbols for 18- and 24-month-old children? Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 185-212.
44. Rose, S. A. (1977). Infants' transfer of response between two-dimensional and three-dimensional stimuli. Child Development, 48, 1086-1091.
45. Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Shanker, S. G., & Taylor, T. J. (1998). Apes, language, and the human mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1978). The earliest precursor of writing. Scientific American, 238, 50-58.
47. Sharon, T. (2003). Made to symbolize: Intentionality and children's early symbolic understanding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois.
48. Sigel, I. E. (1978). The development of pictorial comprehension. In S. Bikkar, B. S. Randhawa, & W. E. Coffman (Eds.), Visual learning, thinking and communication (pp. 93-111). New York: Academic Press.
49. Sigel, I. E. (1990). Journeys in serendipity: The development of the distancing model. In I. E. Sigel & G. H. Brody (Eds.), Methods of family research: Biographies of research projects, Vol. 1: Normal families (pp. 87-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Slater, A., Rose, D., & Morison, V. (1984). New-born infants' perception of similarities and differences between two- and three-dimensional stimuli. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 287-294.
51. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Unversity Press.
52. Tomasello, M., Striano, T., & Rochat, P. (1999). Do young children use objects as symbols? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 563-584.
53. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Werner, H., & Kaplan, H. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.
55. Yonas, A., Choy, M., Alexander, A., & Jacques, J. (April, 2003). Actions of 9-month-old infants directed at a real toy, a photographed toy, and surfaces. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.