Negative and positive polarity items

Semantics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 1660-1712

  Giannakidou, Anastasia ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85119391731     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (147)

1. Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito 2010. Modal indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 18, 1-31.
2. Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Anastasia Giannakidou 1995. Clitics and prominence; or why specificity is not enough. In: A. Dainora et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (= CLS) 31. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 132-150.
3. Atlas, Jay D. 1993. The importance of being only: Testing the neo-gricean versus neo-entailment paradigms. Journal of Semantics 10, 301-318.
4. Atlas, Jay D. 1996. Only noun phrases, pseudo-negative quantifiers, negative polarity items, and monotonicity. Journal of Semantics 13, 265-328.
5. Baker, Carl L. 1970. Double negatives, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 169-186.
6. Beaver, David & Brady Clark 2003. Always and only: Why not all focus sensitive operators are alike. Natural Language Semantics 11, 323-362.
7. Bernardi, Raffaella 2002. Reasoning with Polarity in Categorial Type Logic. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Utrecht.
8. Bittner, Maria 1987. On the semantics of Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 53, 194-231.
9. Borkin, Ann 1971. Polarity items in questions. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (= CLS) 7. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 53-62.
10. Borschev, Vladimir, Elena V. Paducheva, Barbara H. Partee, Yakov G. Testelets & Igor Yanovich 2008. Russian genitives, non-referentiality, and the property-type hypothesis. In: A. Antonenko J. F. Bailyn & Ch. Bethin (eds.). Proceedings of the Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Stony Brook Meeting 2007 (= FASL) 16. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publishers, 48-67.
11. Carlson, Greg 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
12. Cheng, Lisa L.-Ch. & Anastasia Giannakidou 2011. The non-uniformity of wh-indeterminates with polarity and free choice in Chinese. To appear in: K.-H. Gil & G. Tsoulas (eds.). Crosslinguistic Patterns of Quantification. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Chierchia, Gennaro 2006. Broaden your views. Implicatures of domain widening and the "Logicality" of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 535-590.
14. Condoravdi, Cleo 1994. Descriptions in Context. Ph.D. dissertation. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
15. van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen 2008. About something. Towards a syntactic decomposition of polarity. Paper presented at the CUNY Syntax Supper, CUNY Graduate Center at the City University of New York, November 25, 2008.
16. Davison, Alice 1981. Any as universal or existential. In: J. van der Auwera (ed.). The Semantics of Determiners. London: Croom Helm, 11-34.
17. Dayal, Veneeta 1998. Any as inherently modal. Linguistics & Philosophy 21, 433-476.
18. den Dikken, Marcel & Anastasia Giannakidou 2002. From hell to polarity: Aggressively non-d-linked wh-phrases as polarity items. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 31-61.
19. Dowty, David 1994. The role of negative polarity and concord marking in natural language reasoning. In: M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (eds.). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (= SALT) IV. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 114-145.
20. Drenhaus, Heiner, Peter beim Graben, Stefan Frisch, Douglas Saddy 2006. Diagnosis and repair of negative polarity constructions in the light of symbolic resonance analysis. Brain & Language 96, 255-268.
21. Drenhaus, Heiner, Joanna Blaszczak & Juliane Schütte 2010. An ERP Study on the Strength of Licensers in Negative Polarity Constructions. Ms. Potsdam, University of Potsdam.
22. Duffley, Patrick & Pierre Larivée 2010. Anyone for non-scalarity? English Language and Linguistics 14, 1-17.
23. Enç, Mürvet 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1-25.
24. Ernst, Thomas 2009. Speaker oriented adverbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27, 497-544.
25. Falaus, Anamaria 2009. Polarity Items and Dependent Indefinites in Romanian. Ph.D. dissertation. Université de Nantes.
26. Farkas, Donka F. 1992. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In: P. Hirschbühler (ed.). Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 69-105.
27. Farkas, Donka F. 1998. Dependent indefinites. In: F. Corblin, D. Goddard & J.-M. Marandin (eds.). Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang, 243-267.
28. Farkas, Donka F. 2002. Extreme non-specificity in Romanian In: C. Beyssade et al. (eds.). Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 127-151.
29. Fauconnier, Gilles 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6, 353-375.
30. Fernald, Theodore B. & Ellavina Perkins 2006. Negative polarity items in Navajo. In: A. Berez, S. Gessner & S. Tuttle (eds.). Proceedings of the Dene (Athabaskan) Languages Conference (= ALC) 2006 (Alaska Native Language Center Working Papers 7). Fairbanks, AK: ANLC Publications, 19-48.
31. von Fintel, Kai 1999. NPI-licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics 16, 97-148.
32. von Fintel, Kai 2000. Whatever. In: B. Jackson & T. Matthews (eds.). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (= SALT) X. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 27-40.
33. van Geenhoven, Veerle 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tübingen. Reprinted: Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
34. Giannakidou, Anastasia 1994. The semantic licensing of NPIs and the Modern Greek subjunctive. Language and Cognition 4, 55-68.
35. Giannakidou, Anastasia 1995. Subjunctive, habituality and negative polarity. In: M. Simons & T. Galloway (eds.). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (= SALT) V. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University, 132-150.
36. Giannakidou, Anastasia 1997. The Landscape of Polarity Items. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Groningen.
37. Giannakidou, Anastasia 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
38. Giannakidou, Anastasia 1999. Affective dependencies. Linguistics & Philosophy 22, 367-421.
39. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2000. Negative ... Concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 457-523.
40. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics & Philosophy 24, 659-735.
41. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2002. Licensing and sensitivity in polarity items: From downward entailment to nonveridicality. In: M. Andronis, A. Pycha & K. Yoshimura (eds.). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (= CLS) 38. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 29-53.
42. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2006a. Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82, 575-603.
43. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2006b. N-words and negative concord. In: M. Everaert et al. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol III, 327-391. Wiley-Blackwell.
44. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2007. The landscape of EVEN. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25, 39-81.
45. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2009. The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity. Lingua (special issue on Mood) 119, 1883-1908.
46. Giannakidou, Anastasia 2011. Greek quantifiers. To appear in: E. L. Keenan & D. Paperno (eds.). Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Springer.
47. Giannakidou, Anastasia & Lisa Cheng 2006. (In)definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 23, 135-183.
48. Giannakidou, Anastasia & Josep Quer 1995. Two mechanisms for the licensing of negative indefinites. In: L. Gabriele, D. Hardison & R. Westmoreland (eds.). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America (= FLSM) 6, vol. 2: Syntax II & Semantics/ Pragmatics. Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications, 103-114.
49. Giannakidou, Anastasia & Josep Quer 1997. Long distance licensing of negative indefinites. In: D. Forget et al. (eds.). Negation and Polarity, Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 95-113.
50. Giannakidou, Anastasia & Josep Quer 2010. What we gain, and what we lose, with a Hamblin semantics for free choice: From free choice to referential vagueness. Paper presented at the Workshop on Alternative-Based Semantics, University of Nantes, October 29-30, 2010.
51. Giannakidou, Anastasia & Suwon Yoon 2010. No NPI licensing in comparatives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (= CLS) 46, April 8-10, 2010.
52. Guerzoni, Elena 2004. EVEN-NPIs in questions. Natural Language Semantics 12, 319-343.
53. Guerzoni, Elena & Yael Sharvit 2007. A question of strength: On NPIs in interrogative clauses. Linguistics & Philosophy 30, 361-391.
54. Haegeman, Liliane & Rafaella Zanuttini 1981. Neg-heads and the neg-criterion. The Linguistic Review 8, 233-251.
55. Haspelmath, Martin 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Heim, Irene 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachussetts, Amherst, MA. Reprinted: Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
57. Heim 1984. A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness. In: C. Jones & P. Sells (eds.). Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (=NELS) 14. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, 98-107.
58. Herburger, Elena 2003. A note on Spanish ni siquiera, 'even', and the analysis of NPIs. Probus 15, 237-256.
59. Herburger, Elena & Simon Mauck 2006. NPIs are low Scalar Items +F. Ms. Washington, DC, Georgetown University.
60. Hintikka, Jaakko 1962. Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press.
61. Hoeksema, Jacob 1986. Monotonie en superlatieven. In: C. Hoppenbrouwers et al. (eds.). Proeven van taalwetenschap. Groningen: Instituut RUG, 38-49.
62. Hoeksema, Jacob 1994. On the grammaticalization of negative polarity items. In: S. Gahl, A. Dolbey & C. Johnson (eds.). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (= BLS) 20. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 273-282.
63. Hoeksema, Jacob 1999. Aantekeningen bij ooit, deel 2: De opkomst van niet polair ooit. Tabu 29, 147-172.
64. Hoeksema, Jacob 2008. There is no number effect in the licensing of negative polarity items: a reply to Guerzoni and Sharvit. Linguistics & Philosphy 31, 397-407.
65. Hoeksema, Jacob 2010. Dutch ENIG: From nonveridicality to downward entailment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28, 837-859.
66. Hoeksema, Jacob & Hotze Rullmann 2001. Scalarity and polarity: A study of scalar adverbs as polarity items. In: J. Hoeksema et al. (eds.). Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 129-171.
67. de Hoop, Helen 1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Groningen.
68. Horn, Laurence 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
69. Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
70. Horn, Laurence R. 1996. Exclusive company: Only and the dynamics of vertical inference. Journal of Semantics 13, 1-40.
71. Horn, Laurence R. 2000a. Any and (-)ever: Free choice and free relatives. In: A. Z. Wyner (ed.). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics (= IATL) 15. Jerusalem: Akademon, 71-111.
72. Horn, Laurence R. 2000b. Pick a theory: Not just any theory. In: L. Horn & Y. Kato (eds.). Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147-192.
73. Horn, Laurence R. 2002. Assertoric inertia and NPI-licensing. In: M. Andronis et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (= CLS) 38, Parasession on Negation and Polarity. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 55-82.
74. Horn, Laurence R. 2005. Airport '86 revisited: Toward a unified indefinite any. In: G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.). The Partee Effect. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 179-205.
75. Horn, Laurence R. 2006. The boarder wars: A neo-Gricean perspective. In: K. von Heusinger & K. Turner (eds.). Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 21-48.
76. Israel, Michael 1996. Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics. Linguistics & Philosophy 19, 619-666.
77. Israel, Michael 2004. The pragmatics of polarity. In: L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 701-723.
78. Jackson, Eric. 1994. Negative Polarity, Definites under Quantification and General Statements. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
79. Jacobson, Pauline 1995. On the quantificational force of the English free relative. In: A. Kratzer et al. (eds.). Quantification in Natural Language, Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 451-487.
80. Jayez, Jacques & Lucia Tovena 2005. Free choiceness and non-individuation. Linguistics & Philosophy 28, 1-71.
81. Jespersen, Otto 1909-1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
82. Kadmon, Nirit & Fred Landman 1993. Any. Linguistics & Philosophy 16, 353-422.
83. Kas, Mark 1993. Essays on Boolean Semantics and Negative Polarity. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Groningen.
84. Kiparsky, Paul 1998. Partitive case and aspect. In: M. Butt & W. Geuder (eds.). The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 265-307.
85. Klima, Edward 1964. Negation in English. In: J. Fodor & J. Katz (eds.). The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 246-323.
86. König, Ekkehard 2003. The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
87. Kratzer, Angelika & Shimoyama, Junko 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In: Y. Otsu (ed.). Proceedings of the Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics 3. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo, 1-25.
88. Krifka, Manfred 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items in assertion. Linguistic Analysis 15, 209-257.
89. Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Greg Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia & Godehard Link 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In: G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1-124.
90. Ladusaw, William 1980. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. New York: Garland.
91. Ladusaw, William 1983. Logical form and conditions on grammaticality. Linguistics & Philosophy 6, 373-392.
92. Ladusaw, William 1996. Negation and polarity items. In: S. Lappin (ed.). The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 321-341.
93. Lahiri, Utpal 1998. Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics 6, 57-123.
94. Laka, Itziar 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
95. Lee, Chungmin 1997. Negative polarity and free choice: Where do they come from? In: P. Dekker, M. Stokhof & Y. Venema (eds.). Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium 11. Amsterdam: ILLC, 217-222.
96. Lee, Chungmin 1999. Types of NPIs and nonverdicality in Korean and other languages. In: G. Storto (ed.). Syntax at Sunset 2 (UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 3). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 96-132.
97. Lee, Chungmin 2003. Negative polarity items and free choice in Korean and Japanese: A contrastive study. Korean Society of Bilingualism 22.
98. Lee, Jung-Hyuck 2010. Nonveridical dependency: Korean and Japanese focus particles. Japanese/ Korean Linguistics 17, 231-245.
99. Lee, Young-Suk & Laurence R. Horn 1994. Any as an Indefinite plus even. Ms. New Haven, CT, Yale University.
100. Lin, Jo-Wang 1996. Polarity Licensing and Wh-Phrase Quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
101. Linebarger, Marcia 1980. The Grammar of Negative Polarity. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
102. Linebarger, Marcia 1987. Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics & Philosophy 10, 325-387.
103. Linebarger, Marcia 1991. Negative polarity as linguistic evidence. In: L. M. Dobrin, L. Nichols & R. Rodriguez (eds.). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (= CLS) 27, Part Two: The Parasession on Negation. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 165-188.
104. Matthewson, Lisa 1998. Determiner Systems and Quantificational Strategies. Evidence from Salish. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
105. Menéndez-Benito, Paula 2010. On universal free choice items. Natural Language Semantics 18, 33-64.
106. Merchant, Jason 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics & Philosophy 27, 661-738.
107. Montague, Richard 1969. On the nature of certain philosophical entities. The Monist 53, 159-194.
108. Nakanishi, Kimiko 2007. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (= LSA), Workshop on Semantic/Pragmatic Perspectives on Negative Polarity Items, January 4-7, 2007.
109. Nathan, Lance 1999. Either: Negative Polarity Meets Focus Sensitivity. Honors Thesis. Brown University, Providence, RI.
110. Nilsen, Oystein 2003. Eliminating Positions. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Utrecht.
111. Park, Eun-Hae. 2009. Free choice and wh-indeterminates in Korean: Definiteness, indefinites, and expressive content. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
112. Partee, Barbara H. 2008. Negation, intensionality, and aspect: Interaction with NP semantics. In: S. Rothstein (ed.). Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 291-317.
113. Partee, Barbara H. & Vladimir Borschev 2004. The semantics of Russian genitive of negation: The role and nature of perspectival structure. In: K. Watanabe & Robert B. Young (eds.). Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (= SALT) XIV. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 212-234.
114. Pereltsvaig, Asya 2000. Monotonicity-based versus veridicality-based approaches to negative polarity: Evidence from Russian. In: T. Halloway King & I. A. Sekerina (eds.). Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Philadelphia Meeting 1999. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publishers, 328-346.
115. Pereltsvaig, Asya 2008. Russian nibud'-series as markers of co-variation. In: N. Abner & J. Bishop (eds.). Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (= WCCFL) 27. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 370-378.
116. Postal, Paul M. 2000. The Ohio Lectures on squat. Ms. New York, New York University.
117. Postal, Paul M. 2003. Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
118. Potts, Christopher 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
119. Progovac, Ljiljana 1994. Positive and Negative polarity: A binding approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Progovac, Ljiljana 2005. Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items. In: S. Brown & A. Przepiorkowski (eds.). Negation in Slavic. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, 179-217.
121. Przepiórkowski, Adam & Anna Kupc 1997. Eventuality negation and negative concord in Polish and Italian. In: R. D. Borsley & Adam Przepiórkowski (eds.). Slavic in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 211-246.
122. Quer, Josep 1998. Mood at the Interface. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Utrecht.
123. Quer, Josep 1999. The Quantificational Force of Free Choice Items. Ms. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam.
124. Rooth, Mats 1985. Association with Focus. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
125. van Rooy, Robert 2003. Negative polarity items in questions: Strength as relevance. Journal of Semantics 20, 239-273.
126. Rullmann, Hotze 2003. Additive particles and polarity. Journal of Semantics 20, 329-401.
127. Saddy, Douglas, Heiner Drenhaus & Stefan Frisch 2004. Processing polarity items: Contrastive licensing costs. Brain & Language 90, 405-502.
128. Sailer, Manfred 2009. On reading-dependent licensing of strong negative polarity items. In: A. Riester & T. Solstad (eds.). Proceedings of Sinn and Bedeutung (= SuB) 13. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart, 455-468.
129. Seuren, Pieter 1984. The comparative revisited. Journal of Semantics 3, 109-141.
130. Shimoyama, Junko 2003. Wide Scope Universals in Japanese. Ms. Montreal, McGill University.
131. Stalnaker, Robert 1979. Assertion. In: P. Cole (ed.). Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 315-332.
132. Suranyi, Balazs 2006. Quantification and focus in negative concord. Lingua 116, 272-313.
133. Szabolcsi, Anna 2004. Positive polarity - negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22, 409-452.
134. Tancredi, Christopher 2007a. A Multi-Model Modal Theory of I-Semantics, Part I: Modals. Ms. Tokyo, University of Tokyo.
135. Tancredi, Christopher 2007b. A Multi-Model Modal Theory of I-Semantics, Part II: Identity and Attitudes. Ms. Tokyo, University of Tokyo.
136. Tovena, Lucia 1998. The Fine Structure of Polarity Items. New York: Garland.
137. Uribe-Etxebarria, Miriam 1994. Interface Licensing Conditions on Negative Polarity Licensing: A Theory of Polarity and Tense Interactions. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
138. Vendler, Zeno 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press.
139. Vlachou, Evangelia 2007. Free Choice Items In and Out of Context. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Utrecht.
140. van der Wouden, Ton. 1994. Negative Contexts. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Groningen.
141. Yoon, Suwon 2008. From Non-Specificity to Polarity: Korean N-Words. Ms. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago.
142. Yoshimura, Keiko 2007. Focus and Polarity in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
143. Zanuttini, Raffaella 1991. Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
144. Zwarts, Frans 1981. Negatief polaire uitdrukkingen I. Glot International 4, 35-132.
145. Zwarts, Frans 1986. Categoriale Grammatica en Algebraische Semantiek. Een studie naar negatie en polariteit in het Nederlands. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Groningen.
146. Zwarts, Frans 1993. Three Types of Polarity. Ms. Groningen, University of Groningen. Reprinted in: F. Hamm & E. Hinrichs (eds.). Plural Quantification. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998, 177-238.
147. Zwarts, Frans 1995. Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25, 286-312.