Tuning phrase-based segmented translation for a morphologically complex target language

10th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, WMT 2015 at the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2015 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 105-111

  Grönroos, Stig Arne ^a   Virpioja, Sami ^a   Kurimo, Mikko ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

COMPLEX TARGETS; CONSTRAINED CONDITIONS; FINNISH; LANGUAGE PAIRS; SEGMENTER; TARGET LANGUAGE; UNIVERSITY ENTRIES;

TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

EID: 85119383071     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. [Chung and Gildea2009] Tagyoung Chung and Daniel Gildea. 2009. Unsupervised tokenization for machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 2-Volume 2, pages 718-726. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. [Clifton and Sarkar2011] Ann Clifton and Anoop Sarkar. 2011. Combining morpheme-based machine translation with post-processing morpheme prediction. In Proceedings of ACL-HLT, pages 32-42. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. [Creutz and Lagus2005] Mathias Creutz and Krista Lagus. 2005. Inducing the morphological lexicon of a natural language from unannotated text. In Timo Honkela, Ville Könönen, Matti Pöllä, and Olli Simula, editors, Proceedings of AKRR'05, pages 106-113, Espoo, Finland, June. Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science.
4. [De Gispert et al.2009] Adrià De Gispert, Sami Virpioja, Mikko Kurimo, and William Byrne. 2009. Minimum Bayes risk combination of translation hypotheses from alternative morphological decompositions. In Proceedings of HLTNAACL 2009: Short Papers, pages 73-76. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. [Fishel and Kirik2010] Mark Fishel and Harri Kirik. 2010. Linguistically motivated unsupervised segmentation for machine translation. In LREC.
6. [Grönroos et al.2014] Stig-Arne Grönroos, Sami Virpioja, Peter Smit, and Mikko Kurimo. 2014. Morfessor FlatCat: An HMM-based method for unsupervised and semi-supervised learning of morphology. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 1177-1185. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. [Habash and Sadat2006] Nizar Habash and Fatiha Sadat. 2006. Arabic preprocessing schemes for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. [Koehn et al.2007] Philipp Koehn, Hieu Hoang, Alexandra Birch, Chris Callison-Burch, Marcello Federico, Nicola Bertoldi, Brooke Cowan, Wade Shen, Christine Moran, Richard Zens, et al. 2007. Moses: Open source toolkit for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the ACL on interactive poster and demonstration sessions, pages 177-180. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. [Koehn2005] Philipp Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In MT summit, volume 5, pages 79-86.
10. [Lee2004] Young-Suk Lee. 2004. Morphological analysis for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004: Short Papers, pages 57-60. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. [Mikolov et al.2010] Tomas Mikolov, Martin Karafiát, Lukas Burget, Jan Cernockỳ, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. 2010. Recurrent neural network based language model. In INTERSPEECH 2010, 11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Makuhari, Chiba, Japan, September 26-30, 2010, pages 1045-1048.
12. [Mikolov et al.2011] Tomas Mikolov, Anoop Deoras, Stefan Kombrink, Lukas Burget, and Jan Honza Cernocky. 2011. Empirical evaluation and combination of advanced language modeling techniques. In Interspeech. ISCA, August.
13. [Nießen and Ney2004] Sonja Nießen and Hermann Ney. 2004. Statistical machine translation with scarce resources using morpho-syntactic information. Computational linguistics, 30(2):181-204.
14. [Och2003] Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, pages 160-167. Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. [Papineni et al.2002] Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, pages 311-318. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. [Rissanen1989] Jorma Rissanen. 1989. Stochastic Complexity in Statistical Inquiry, volume 15. World Scientific Series in Computer Science, Singapore.
17. [Salameh et al.2015] Mohammad Salameh, Colin Cherry, and Grzegorz Kondrak. 2015. What matters most in morphologically segmented SMT models? Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation, page 65.
18. [Snyder and Barzilay2008] Benjamin Snyder and Regina Barzilay. 2008. Unsupervised multilingual learning for morphological segmentation. In ACL, pages 737-745.
19. [Stymne and Cancedda2011] Sara Stymne and Nicola Cancedda. 2011. Productive generation of compound words in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 250-260. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. [Virpioja et al.2007] Sami Virpioja, Jaakko J Väyrynen, Mathias Creutz, and Markus Sadeniemi. 2007. Morphology-aware statistical machine translation based on morphs induced in an unsupervised manner. Machine Translation Summit XI, 2007:491-498.