Learning to spell in different languages: How orthographic variables might affect early literacy

Handbook of Orthography and Literacy

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 497-511

  Caravolas, Marketa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118812284     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Alegria, J., & Mousty, P. (1994). On the development of lexical and nonlexical spelling procedures of French-speaking normal and disabled children. In G. B. a. N. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and invervention (pp. 211-226). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
2. Besner, D., & Smith, M. (1992). Basic processes in reading: Is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking? In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 45-66). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
3. Bissex, G. L. (1980). GNYS at work: A child learns to write and read. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Brack, M., Genesee, F., & Caravolas, M. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early literacy acquisition. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Brack, M., Treiman, R., Caravolas, M., Genesee, F., & Cassar, M. (1998). Spelling skills of children in whole language and phonics classrooms. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 669-684.
6. Bryant, P. E., Nunes, T., & Bindman, M. (1997). Children's understanding of the connection between grammar and spelling. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention. Mahwaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Byrne, B. (1998). The foundation of literacy: The child 's acquisition of the alphabetic principle: Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
8. Caravolas, M., & Brack, B. (2000). Vowel categorization skill and its relationship to early literacy skills among first-grade Québec-French children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 190-221.
9. Caravolas, M., & Brack, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children's phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1-30.
10. Caravolas, M., Brack, M., & Genesee, F. (2003). Similarities and differences between English- and French-speaking poor spellers. In N. Goulandris (Ed.), Dyslexia in different languages, (pp. 157-180). London: Whurr.
11. Caravolas, M., Hulme, C, & Snowling, M. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751-774.
12. Carney, E. (1994). A survey of English spelling. London: Routledge.
13. Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letter in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631-644.
14. Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I., Katz, L., & Tola, G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1-16.
15. Ehri, L. C. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice (pp. 237-269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Fayol, M., Hupet, M., & Largy, P. (1999). The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in written French: From novices to experts' errors. Reading and Writing, 11, 153-174.
17. Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling London: Academic Press.
18. Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
19. Gentry, J. R. (1982). Analysis of developmental spelling skills in GNYS AT WORK. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192-200.
20. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Goswami, U., Gombert, J.-E., & de Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children's orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19-52.
22. Hanna, P. R., Hanna, J. S., Hodges, R. E., & Rudorf, E. F. (1966). Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
23. Henderson, E. H., & Beers, J. W. (Eds.). (1980). Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell: A reflection of word knowledge. Newark, NJ. International Reading Association.
24. Hendrich, J., Radina, O., & Tláskal, J. (1991). Francouská Mluvnice [French Grammar]. Prague: Státní Pedagogické Nakladatelství.
25. Hlavsa, Z. (1998). Pravidla českého Pravopisu [The Rules of Czech Orthography]. Prague: Academia.
26. Justicia, F., Dehor, S., Pelegrina, S., & Martos, F. (1999). Sources of error in Spanish writing. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 198-202.
27. Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 67-84). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Publishers.
28. Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 592-617.
29. Kreiner, D. S. (1996). Effects of word familiarity and phoneme-grapheme polygraphy on oral spelling time and accuracy. Psychological Record, 46, 49-70.
30. Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: Evidence from German and English children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 243-262.
31. Liberman, I. Y, Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C, & Fischer, F. W. (1977). Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In A. S. Reber & D. Scarborough (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 128-152.
33. Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1-15.
34. Oney, B., & Goldman, S. R. (1984). Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: Effects of the regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 557-567.
35. Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401-426.
36. Palková, Z. (1997). Fonetika a fonologie češtiny [Czech phonetics and phonology]. Prague: Karolinum.
37. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1999). Lexop: A lexical database with orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 376-379.
38. Peereman, R., Content, A., & Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 151-174.
39. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Learning to spell: Variability, choice and change in children's strategy use. Child Development, 70, 332-348.
40. Sénéchal, M. (2000). Morphological effects in children's spelling of French words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 76-85.
41. Steffier, D., Varnhagen, C. K., Friesen, C. K., & Treiman, R. (1998). There's more to children's spelling than the errors they make: Strategic and automatic processes for one-syllable words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 492-505.
42. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
43. Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Treiman, R., Cassar, M., & Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development, 65, 1310-1329.
45. Treiman, R., Zukowski, A., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). What happened to the "n" of sink? Children's spellings of final consonant clusters. Cognition, 55, 1-38.
46. Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German. Cognition, 54, 91-103.
47. Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1997). How learning to spell German differs from learning to spell English. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R., & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219-249.
49. Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321-340.
50. Ziegler, J. C, Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504-515.