Learning technology and learning relationships

Teaching & Learning Online: New Pedagogies for New Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 16-26

  Mayes, Terry ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118746320     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Anderson, J R, Boyle, C F, Farrell, R and Reiser, B J (1987) Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors, in Modeling Cognition, ed P Morris, Wiley, New York.
2. Bandura, A (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Barab, S A and Duffy, T M (2000) From practice fields to communities of practice, in Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, eds D H Jonassen and S M Land, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
4. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV) (1990) Anchored instruction and its relation to situated cognition, Educational Researcher, 19, pp 2-10.
5. Collins, A, Brown, J S and Newman, S E (1989) Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics, in Knowing and Learning: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser, ed L B Renswick, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. CTGV (1993) Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited, Educational Technology, 33, pp 52-70.
7. Cumming, G (1993) A perspective on learning for intelligent educational systems, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9,229-38.
8. Fitts, P M and Posner, MI (1967) Human Performance, Brooks-Cole, Belmont CA.
9. Fowler, C J H and Mayes, J T (1999) Learning Relationships: from theory to design, Association for Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J), 7 (3), pp 6-16.
10. Glaser, R (1990) The re-emergence of learning theory within instructional research, American Psychologist, 45 (1), 29-39.
11. Jonassen, D H and Land, S M (eds) (2000) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
12. Lave, J (1997) The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding, in Situated Cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives, eds D Kirshner and J A Whitson, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
13. Lave, J and Wenger, E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Mayes, J T (1995) Learning Technologies and Groundhog Day, in Hypermedia at work: Practice and theory in Higher Education, eds W Strang, V B Simpson and D Slater, University of Kent Press, Canterbury.
15. Mayes, J T and Fowler, C J H (1999) Learning technology and usability: a framework for understanding courseware, Interacting with Computers, 11, pp 485-97.
16. Papert, S (1990) An introduction to the fifth anniversary collection, in Constructionist Learning, ed I Harel, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA.
17. Savery, J and Duffy, T M (1996) Problem-based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework, in Constructivist Learning Environments: Case studies in instructional design, ed B Wilson, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Turner, J C (1991) Social Influence, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
19. Wenger, E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.