Beyond NomBank: A study of implicit arguments for nominal predicates

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2010-July, Issue , 2010, Pages 1583-1592

  Gerber, Matthew ^a   Chai, Joyce Y ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CLASSIFICATION MODELS; SEMANTIC PROCESSING; SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85118462249     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Aljoscha Burchardt, Anette Frank, and Manfred Pinkal. 2005. Building text meaning representations from contextually related frames - a case study. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics.
2. Xavier Carreras and Lluís Màrquez. 2005. Introduction to the CoNLL-2005 shared task: Semantic role labeling.
3. Nathanael Chambers and Dan Jurafsky. 2008. Unsupervised learning of narrative event chains. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 789-797, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):3746.
5. Bradley Efron and Robert J. Tibshirani. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York.
6. Rong-En Fan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Xiang-Rui Wang, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871-1874.
7. Christiane Fellbaum. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database (Language, Speech, and Communication). The MIT Press, May.
8. C.J. Fillmore and C.F. Baker. 2001. Frame semantics for text understanding. In Proceedings of WordNet and Other Lexical Resources Workshop, NAACL.
9. Matthew Gerber, Joyce Y. Chai, and Adam Meyers. 2009. The role of implicit argumentation in nominal SRL. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 146-154, Boulder, Colorado, USA, June.
10. David Graff. 2003. English Gigaword. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.
11. Jan Hajič, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Richard Johansson, Daisuke Kawahara, Maria Antònia Martí, Lluís Màrquez, Adam Meyers, Joakim Nivre, Sebastian Padó, Jan Štěpánek, Pavel Straňák, Mihai Surdeanu, Nianwen Xue, and Yi Zhang. 2009. The CoNLL-2009 shared task: Syntactic and semantic dependencies in multiple languages. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2009): Shared Task, pages 1-18, Boulder, Colorado, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. Ryu Iida, Mamoru Komachi, Kentaro Inui, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2007. Annotating a Japanese text corpus with predicate-argument and coreference relations. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop in ACL-2007, page 132139.
13. Kenji Imamura, Kuniko Saito, and Tomoko Izumi. 2009. Discriminative approach to predicate-argument structure analysis with zero-anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pages 85-88, Suntec, Singapore, August. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. P. Kingsbury, M. Palmer, and M. Marcus. 2002. Adding semantic annotation to the Penn TreeBank. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT'02).
15. Karin Kipper. 2005. VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania.
16. Mitchell Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn TreeBank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313-330.
17. Adam Meyers. 2007. Annotation guidelines for NomBank - noun argument structure for PropBank. Technical report, New York University.
18. Martha S. Palmer, Deborah A. Dahl, Rebecca J. Schiffman, Lynette Hirschman, Marcia Linebarger, and John Dowding. 1986. Recovering implicit information. In Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 10-19, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Patrick Pantel and Deepak Ravichandran. 2004. Automatically labeling semantic classes. In Daniel Marcu Susan Dumais and Salim Roukos, editors, HLT-NAACL 2004: Main Proceedings, pages 321-328, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, May 2 - May 7. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. Rashmi Prasad, Alan Lee, Nikhil Dinesh, Eleni Miltsakaki, Geraud Campion, Aravind Joshi, and Bonnie Webber. 2008. Penn discourse treebank version 2.0. Linguistic Data Consortium, February.
21. P. Pudil, J. Novovicova, and J. Kittler. 1994. Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters, 15:1119-1125.
22. Vasin Punyakanok, Dan Roth, and Wen-tau Yih. 2008. The importance of syntactic parsing and inference in semantic role labeling. Comput. Linguist., 34(2):257-287.
23. Josef Ruppenhofer, Caroline Sporleder, Roser Morante, Collin Baker, and Martha Palmer. 2009. Semeval-2010 task 10: Linking events and their participants in discourse. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Evaluations: Recent Achievements and Future Directions (SEW-2009), pages 106-111, Boulder, Colorado, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. Ryohei Sasano, Daisuke Kawahara, and Sadao Kurohashi. 2004. Automatic construction of nominal case frames and its application to indirect anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of Coling 2004, pages 1201-1207, Geneva, Switzerland, Aug 23-Aug 27. COLING.
25. Mihai Surdeanu, Richard Johansson, Adam Meyers, Lluís Màrquez, and Joakim Nivre. 2008. The CoNLL 2008 shared task on joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies. In CoNLL 2008: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 159-177, Manchester, England, August. Coling 2008 Organizing Committee.