Bootstrapping statistical parsers from small datasets

10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 331-338

  Steedman, Mark ^a   Osborne, Miles ^a   Sarkar, Anoop ^b   Clark, Stephen ^a   Hwa, Rebecca ^c   Hockenmaier, Julia ^a   Ruhlen, Paul ^d   Baker, Steven ^e   Crim, Jeremiah ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^e Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SYNTACTICS;

CO-TRAINING; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; PERFORMANCE; SMALL DATA SET; STATISTICAL PARSER; TARGET DOMAIN; TESTING MATERIALS; TRAINING MATERIAL; TRAINING METHODS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85118305024     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Steven Abney. 2002. Bootstrapping. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 360-367, Philadelphia, PA.
2. E. Black, S. Abney, D. Flickinger, C. Gdaniec, R. Grishman, P. Harrison, D. Hindle, R. Ingria, F. Jelinek, J. Klavans, M. Liberman, M. Marcus, S. Roukos, B. Santorini, and T. Strzalkowski. 1991. A procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars. In Proceedings of DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, pages 306-311.
3. Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pages 92-100, Madisson, WI.
4. Eugene Charniak. 1997. Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. In Proceedings of the AAAL pages 598-603, Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press/MIT Press.
5. Michael Collins and Yoram Singer. 1999. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in NLP Conference, pages 100-110, University of Maryland, MD.
6. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Sanjoy Dasgupta, Michael Littman, and David McAllester. 2002. PAC generalization bounds for co-training. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, and Z. Ghahramani, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
8. Daniel Gildea. 2001. Corpus variation and parser performance. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in NLP Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
9. Sally Goldman and Yan Zhou. 2000. Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stanford, CA.
10. Mitchell Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2): 313-330.
11. Kamal Nigam and Rayid Ghani. 2000. Analyzing the effectiveness and applicability of co-training. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 86-93.
12. David Pierce and Claire Cardie. 2001. Limitations of co-training for natural language learning from large datasets. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in NLP Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
13. Anoop Sarluu-. 2001. Applying co-training methods to statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the NAACL, pages 95-102, Pittsburgh, PA.
14. David Yarowsky. 1995. Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 189-196, Cambridge, MA.