A FACTOR AND STRUCTURAL EQUATION ANALYSIS OF THE ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS SUCCESS MEASUREMENT MODEL

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 449-463

  Sedera, Darshana ^a   Gable, Guy ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

confirmatory factor analysis; Enterprise system; ESS; structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; FACTOR ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; ENTERPRISE SYSTEM; ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SUCCESS; MEASUREMENT MODEL; ORGANISATIONAL; STRUCTURAL EQUATION ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; SUCCESS MEASUREMENT; SYSTEM SUCCESS;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 85113694390     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (80)

1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A. “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), 1992, pp. 227-247.
2. Allen, T., and Scott Morton, M. S. Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990’s, Oxford Press, New York, 1992.
3. Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. “The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmation Factor Analysis,” Psychometrika (49:2), 1984, pp. 155-173.
4. Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. “Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement,” Journal of Marketing Research (19), 1982, pp. 453-460.
5. Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin (103:3), 1988, pp. 411-423.
6. Attewell, P., and Rule, J. “Computing in Organizations: What We Know and What We Don’t Know,” Communications of the ACM, December, 1984, pp. 1184-1192.
7. Bagozzi, R. P. Causal Modeling in Marketing, Wiley and Sons, New York,1980.
8. Bagozzi, R. P., and Phillips, L. W. “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Historical Construal,” Administrative Science Quarterly (23:3), 1982, pp. 459-489.
9. Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. “Assessing Method Variance in Multi-Trait Multi-Method Matrices: The Case of Self Reported Affect and Perceptions at Work,” Journal of Applied Psychology (75:5), 1991, pp. 547-560.
10. Bailey, J. E., and Pearson, S. W. “Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction,” Management Science (29:5), 1983, pp. 530-545.
11. Barki, H., and Hartwick, J. “Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement,” MIS Quarterly (13:1), March 1989, pp. 53-63.
12. Barki, H., and Huff, S. L. “Change, Attitude to Change, and Decision Support System Success,” Information & Management (9:5), 1985, pp. 261-268.
13. Barua, A., Kriebel, C., and Mukhopadhyay, T. “Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation,” Information Systems Research (6:1), 1995, pp. 3-50.
14. Barua, A., and Lee, B. “The Information Technology Productivity Paradox Revisited: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation in the Manufacturing Sector,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems (9:2), 1997, pp. 145-166.
15. Bearden, W. O., Sharma, S., and Teel, J. E. “Sample Size Effects Upon Chi-Square and Other Statistics Used in Evaluating Causal Models,” Journal of Marketing Research (19), 1982, pp. 425-430.
16. Bentler, P. M., and Chou, C. “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling,” Sociological Methods and Research (16), 1987, pp. 78-117.
17. Bollen, K. A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989.
18. Boomsma, A. “The Robustness of LISREL Against Small Sample Sizes in Factor Analysis Models,” in System under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure and Prediction, K. G. Joreskog and H. Wold (Eds.), North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 149-173.
19. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. “Paradox Lost? Firm Level Evidence on the Return of Information Systems Spending,” Management Science (42:4), 1996, pp. 541-558.
20. Brynjolfsson, E., and Yang, S. “Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of Literature,” Advances in Computers (43), 1996, pp. 170-214.
21. Cameron, K. S., and Quinn, R. E. “Organizational Paradox and Transformation,”in Paradox of Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 1988, pp. 1-18.
22. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. “Convergent and Discriminant Validity by the Multi-Trait Multi-Method Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin (56:2), 1959, pp. 81-105.
23. Chandler, J. “A Multiple Criteria Approach for Evaluating Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (6:1), 1982, pp. 61-84.
24. Delone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. “The Delone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten Years Update,” Journal of Management Information System (19:4), 2003, pp. 9-30.
25. Delone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research (3:1), 1992, pp. 60-95.
26. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002.
27. Doll, W. J., and Torkzadeh, G. “The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction,” MIS Quarterly (12:2), June 1988, pp. 259-274.
28. Doll, W. J., Xia, W., and Torkzadeh, G. “A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument,” MIS Quarterly, December 1994, pp. 453-461.
29. Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. “Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems,” Management Science (24:10), 1978, pp. 1064-1077.
30. Fornell, C. “Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research (9), 1983, pp. 443-448.
31. Gable, G. “A Multidimensional Model of Client Success When Engaging External Consultants,” Management Science (42:8), 1996, pp. 1175-1198.
32. th International Conference on Information Systems, S. T. March, A. Massey and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Seattle, WA, 2003
33. Gatian, A. W. “Is User Satisfaction a Valid Measure of System Effectiveness,” Information and Management (26:3), 1994, pp. 119-131.
34. Gelderman, M. “The Relation Between User Satisfaction, Usage of Information Systems and Performance,” Information & Management (34), 1998, pp. 11-18.
35. Ginzberg, M. J. “Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions,” Management Science (27:4), 1981, pp. 459-478.
36. Harman, H. H. Modern Factor Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976.
37. Hawk, S. R., and Aldag, R. J. “Measurement Biasness in User Involvement Research,” Omega International Journal of Management Science (18:6), 1990, pp. 605-613.
38. Heo, J., and Han, I. “Performance Measures of Information Systems (IS) in Evolving Computing Environments: An Empirical Investigation,” Information & Management (1:14), 2002, pp. 1-14
39. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., and Jackson, J. E. Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 1983.
40. Ives, B., Olson, M. H., and Baroudi, J. J. “The Measurement of User Satisfaction,” Communications of the ACM (26:10), 1983, pp. 785-793.
41. Joreskog, K., and Sorbom, D. LISREL 8: Users Reference Guide, Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL, 2001.
42. Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. “The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992.
43. Kerlinger, F. N. Foundation of Behavioral Research, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1988.
44. Kelloway, E. K. Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Research Guide, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA, 1998.
45. King, J. L., and Rodriguez, J. I. “Cost Benefit Analysis in Information Systems Development and Operations,” Computing Surveys (10:1), 1978, pp. 19-34.
46. Lehr, B., and Lichtenberg, F. “Information Technology and its Impact on Productivity: Firm Level Evidence from Government and Private Data Sources, 1977-1993,” Canadian Journal of Economics (32:2), 1999, pp. 335-362.
47. Mackenzie, K. D., and House, R. “Paradigm Development in the Social Sciences,” in Research Organizations: Issues and Controversies, R. T. Mowday and R. M. Steers (Eds.), Goodyear Publishing, Santa Monica, CA, 1979.
48. Martin, G. “What Is the Value of Investment in Information Systems?,” MIS Quarterly (3:3), 1979, pp. 5-34.
49. Mason, R. O. “Measuring Information Output: A Communication Systems Approach,” Information & Management (1:5), 1978, pp. 219-234.
50. McGrath, J. “Toward a ‘Theory of Method’ for Research on Organizations” in Research in Organizations: Issues and Controversies, R. T. Mowday and R. M. Steers (Eds.), Goodyear Publishing, Santa Monica, CA, 1979, pp. 4-21.
51. Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., and Holaham, P. J. “A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Research,” Journal of Management (20), 1994, pp. 439-464.
52. Melone, N. P. “A Theoretical Assessment of User Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research,” Management Science (36:1), 1990, pp. 76-91.
53. Messick, S. “Validity of Psychological Assessment,” American Psychologist (50), 1995, pp. 741-749.
54. Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., and Prybutok, V. R. A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 1997.
55. Mukherjee, K. “Productivity Growth in Large US Commercial Banks: The Initial Post Regulation Experience,” Journal of Banking and Finance (25:5), 2001, pp. 913.
56. Rai, A., Lang, S. S., and Welker, R. B. “Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis,” Information Systems Research (13:1), 2002, pp. 50-69.
57. Robey, D. “User Attitudes and Management Information System Use,” Academy of Management Journal, 1979, pp. 527-538.
58. Rolefson, J. F. “The DP Check-Up,” Journal of System Management (29:11), 1978, 1979, pp. 38-48.
59. Saarinen, T. “An Expanded Instrument for Evaluating Information System Success,” Information & Management (31), 1996, pp. 103-118.
60. Saunders, C. S., and Jones, J. W. “Measuring the Performance of the Information Systems Function,” Journal of Management Information Systems (8:4), 1992, pp. 63-82.
61. Scott Morton, M. S. (Ed.). The Corporations of the 1990’s, Oxford University Press, New York, 1990.
62. th Americas Conference on Information Systems, J. Ross and D. Galletta (Eds.), Tampa, Florida, 2003.
63. Sedera, D., Gable, G., and Chan, T. “Measuring Enterprise Systems Success: The Importance of a Multiple Stakeholder Perspective” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Turku, Finland, July 10-16, 2004
64. Sedera, D., Gable, G., and Palmer, A. “Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Impacts: A Delphi Study of Australian Public Sector Organizations” in Proceedings of the Pacific Asian Conference on Information Systems, Tokyo, Japan, September 3-5, 2002.
65. th European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia, 2001.
66. Seddon, P. B. “A Respecification and Extension of the Delone and McLean Model of IS Success,” Information Systems Research (8), September 1997 pp. 240-253.
67. th International Conference on Information Systems, J. I. DeGross, S. L. Huff, and M. C. Munroe, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1994, pp. 99-110.
68. Segars, A. H., and Grover, V. “Re-examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis,” MIS Quarterly (17:4), 1993, pp. 517-525.
69. Shang, S., and Seddon, P. B. “A Comprehensive Framework for Classifying Benefits of ERP Systems,” in Proceedings of the Sixth Americas Conference on Information Systems, M. Chung (Ed.), Long Beach, CA, August 10-13, 2000, pp. 1005-1014.
70. Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1949.
71. Stinger, J. H. “Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach,” Multivariate Behavioral Research (25), 1990, pp. 173-180 .
72. Straub, D. W. “Validating Instruments in MIS Research,” MIS Quarterly, 1989, pp. 147-169.
73. Tanaka, J. S. “Multifaceted Conceptions of Fit in Structural Equation Models” in Testing Structural Equation Model, K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Sage Publications, Newbury, CA, 1993.
74. Tanaka, J. S., and Huba, G. J. “Confirmatory Hierarchical Factor Analysis of Psychological Distress Measures,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (46:3), 1984, pp. 621-635.
75. Welke, R. J., and Konsynski, B. R. “An Examination of the Interaction between Technology, Methodology and Information Systems: A Tripartite View,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems, E. R. McLean (Ed.), Philadelphia, PA, 1980, pp. 32-48
76. Widaman, K. F. “Hierarchical Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multi-Trait Multi-Method Data,” Applied Psychological Measurement (9:1), 1985, pp. 1-26.
77. Wilson, D. “Assessing the Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Performance,” in Strategic Information Technology Management, Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA, 1993.
78. Woszczynki, A. B., and Whitman, M. E. “The Problems of Common Method Variance in IS Research” in The Handbook of Information Systems Research, M. E. Whitman and A. B. Woszczynki (Eds), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2002.
79. Young, S. T. “Hospitals Materials Management: Systems and Performance,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1989, pp. 31-35.
80. Yuthas, K., and Young, S. T. “Material Matters: Assessing the Effectiveness of Material Management IS,” Information & Management (33), 1998, pp. 115-124.